Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking and Frankfort Horizontal Plane Construction: Reproducibility of Conventional and Novel Landmarks.
X-ray computed
anatomic landmarks
cephalometry
orthodontics
orthognathic surgery
reproducibility of results
tomography
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Nov 2021
15 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
16
09
2021
revised:
10
11
2021
accepted:
11
11
2021
entrez:
27
11
2021
pubmed:
28
11
2021
medline:
28
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In some dentofacial deformity patients, especially patients undergoing surgical orthodontic treatments, Computed Tomography (CT) scans are useful to assess complex asymmetry or to plan orthognathic surgery. This assessment would be made easier for orthodontists and surgeons with a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis, which would require the localization of landmarks and the construction of reference planes. The objectives of this study were to assess manual landmarking repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) of a set of 3D landmarks and to evaluate R&R of vertical cephalometric measurements using two Frankfort Horizontal (FH) planes as references for horizontal 3D imaging reorientation. Thirty-three landmarks, divided into "conventional", "foraminal" and "dental", were manually located twice by three experienced operators on 20 randomly-selected CT scans of orthognathic surgery patients. R&R confidence intervals (CI) of each landmark in the -x, -y and -z directions were computed according to the ISO 5725 standard. These landmarks were then used to construct 2 FH planes: a conventional FH plane (orbitale left, porion right and left) and a newly proposed FH plane (midinternal acoustic foramen, orbitale right and left). R&R of vertical cephalometric measurements were computed using these 2 FH planes as horizontal references for CT reorientation. Landmarks showing a 95% CI of repeatability and/or reproducibility > 2 mm were found exclusively in the "conventional" landmarks group. Vertical measurements showed excellent R&R (95% CI < 1 mm) with either FH plane as horizontal reference. However, the 2 FH planes were not found to be parallel (absolute angular difference of 2.41°, SD 1.27°). Overall, "dental" and "foraminal" landmarks were more reliable than the "conventional" landmarks. Despite the poor reliability of the landmarks orbitale and porion, the construction of the conventional FH plane provided a reliable horizontal reference for 3D craniofacial CT scan reorientation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34830583
pii: jcm10225303
doi: 10.3390/jcm10225303
pmc: PMC8624462
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Fondation des gueules cassées
ID : 28-2020
Organisme : Société Française d'Orthopédie Dento-Faciale
ID : 2019 research prize
Références
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jul;144(1):156-61
pubmed: 23810057
Sci Rep. 2017 May 19;7(1):2157
pubmed: 28526831
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014 May;17(2):69-91
pubmed: 24373559
Angle Orthod. 2014 Sep;84(5):762-72
pubmed: 24364751
Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):11-7
pubmed: 24713068
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Jul;38(5):262-73
pubmed: 19474253
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Mar;48(3):347-354
pubmed: 30220486
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Dec;41(12):2598-604
pubmed: 26796439
BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):744
pubmed: 8819450
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Aug;152(2):242-249
pubmed: 28760286
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011 Nov;19(4):683-709, ix
pubmed: 22004861
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Feb;35(1):38-44
pubmed: 21447781
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):315-8
pubmed: 23910214
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):598-604
pubmed: 20451778
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;39(2):71-6
pubmed: 24471021
Prog Orthod. 2018 Dec 3;19(1):47
pubmed: 30506410
Eur J Orthod. 2018 May 25;40(3):239-248
pubmed: 29016738
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;49(10):1367-1378
pubmed: 32169306
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Jun;34(3):276-86
pubmed: 21566086
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;38(3):214-21
pubmed: 19574058
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jun;123(6):781-785
pubmed: 31590978
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Aug;116(2):238-57
pubmed: 23849378
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Feb;107(2):256-65
pubmed: 18718796
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;43(10):1942-7
pubmed: 26439520
Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):317-332
pubmed: 30423256
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 10;10(2):e0117604
pubmed: 25668209
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2020 Sep;43(3):1087-1099
pubmed: 32776319
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Jun;34(3):263-75
pubmed: 21385857
J Dent Res. 2021 Aug;100(9):943-949
pubmed: 33783247
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 01;17(4):e678-88
pubmed: 22322503
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140282
pubmed: 25358833
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 May;149(5):645-56
pubmed: 27131246