Sequential first-line treatment with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: GABRINOX phase Ib-II controlled clinical trial.


Journal

ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 27 07 2021
revised: 27 10 2021
accepted: 29 10 2021
pubmed: 28 11 2021
medline: 25 3 2022
entrez: 27 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (AG) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are promising drugs in metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). This study evaluated a new first-line sequential treatment (AG followed by FFX) in MPC that might overcome resistance to primary therapy and delay tumor progression. Patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed MPC were included in a multicentric trial receiving AG (day 1, 8 and 15) followed by FFX (day 29 and 43). In phase Ib, three dose-levels were tested for maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose. In phase II, the main outcome was the objective response rate (ORR) and secondarily safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In phase Ib, we included 33 patients (31 assessable) of median age 61.0 years (range 42-75 years) and represented by 54.8% males. Five dose-limiting toxicities were reported without any death. The main grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia with spontaneous resolution (35.5%/32.3%), venous thromboembolism (grade 3: 22.6%) and thrombopenia (grade 3: 29.0%), while the MTD was not reached. In phase II, we included 58 patients of median age 60 years (range 34-72 years), 50% males and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group stage score 0 and 1 of 37.9% and 62.1%, respectively. They received a median of 4 (1-9) cycles in 8.5 months (0.5-19.8 months). The ORR was 64.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.1% to 77.1%], and neurotoxicity was remarkably low. The main grade 3-4 toxicities were venous thromboembolism, thrombopenia, neutropenia/febrile neutropenia, nausea, diarrhea, weight loss and asthenia without any death. Tumor response was complete in 3.5% and partial in 61.4%, while disease was stable in 19.3% and progressive in 15.8% of patients. The median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI 6.0-12.5 months) and median OS was 15.1 months (95% CI 10.6-20.1 months). Sequential AG and FFX showed acceptable toxicity as first-line treatment with no limiting neurotoxicity, while high response rate and survival justify randomized trials.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (AG) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are promising drugs in metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). This study evaluated a new first-line sequential treatment (AG followed by FFX) in MPC that might overcome resistance to primary therapy and delay tumor progression.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed MPC were included in a multicentric trial receiving AG (day 1, 8 and 15) followed by FFX (day 29 and 43). In phase Ib, three dose-levels were tested for maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose. In phase II, the main outcome was the objective response rate (ORR) and secondarily safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS
In phase Ib, we included 33 patients (31 assessable) of median age 61.0 years (range 42-75 years) and represented by 54.8% males. Five dose-limiting toxicities were reported without any death. The main grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia with spontaneous resolution (35.5%/32.3%), venous thromboembolism (grade 3: 22.6%) and thrombopenia (grade 3: 29.0%), while the MTD was not reached. In phase II, we included 58 patients of median age 60 years (range 34-72 years), 50% males and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group stage score 0 and 1 of 37.9% and 62.1%, respectively. They received a median of 4 (1-9) cycles in 8.5 months (0.5-19.8 months). The ORR was 64.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.1% to 77.1%], and neurotoxicity was remarkably low. The main grade 3-4 toxicities were venous thromboembolism, thrombopenia, neutropenia/febrile neutropenia, nausea, diarrhea, weight loss and asthenia without any death. Tumor response was complete in 3.5% and partial in 61.4%, while disease was stable in 19.3% and progressive in 15.8% of patients. The median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI 6.0-12.5 months) and median OS was 15.1 months (95% CI 10.6-20.1 months).
CONCLUSION
Sequential AG and FFX showed acceptable toxicity as first-line treatment with no limiting neurotoxicity, while high response rate and survival justify randomized trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34837745
pii: S2059-7029(21)00280-5
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100318
pmc: PMC8637474
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxel 0
Albumins 0
folfirinox 0
Oxaliplatin 04ZR38536J
Deoxycytidine 0W860991D6
Irinotecan 7673326042
Paclitaxel P88XT4IS4D
Leucovorin Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT
Gemcitabine 0

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase I Clinical Trial, Phase II Controlled Clinical Trial Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100318

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Institut régional du Cancer de Montepllier (ICM). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

E Assenat (E)

Medical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. Electronic address: e-assenat@chu-montpellier.fr.

C de la Fouchardière (C)

Medical Oncology Department, Léon Bérard Centre, Lyon, France.

F Portales (F)

Medical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

M Ychou (M)

Medical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

A Debourdeau (A)

CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

F Desseigne (F)

Medical Oncology Department, Léon Bérard Centre, Lyon, France.

S Iltache (S)

CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

C Fiess (C)

Medical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Clinical Research and Innovation Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

C Mollevi (C)

Biometrics Unit, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Desbrest d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IDESP), INSERM UMR UA 11, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

T Mazard (T)

Medical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH