Superiority of craniotomy over supportive care for octogenarians and nonagenarians in operable acute traumatic subdural hematoma.
Geriatric surgery
Neurosurgery
Subdural hematoma
Subgroup analysis
Traumatic brain injury
Journal
Clinical neurology and neurosurgery
ISSN: 1872-6968
Titre abrégé: Clin Neurol Neurosurg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7502039
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
received:
28
08
2021
revised:
14
11
2021
accepted:
15
11
2021
pubmed:
30
11
2021
medline:
29
3
2022
entrez:
29
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Neurosurgical evacuation in elderly trauma patients is controversial. We analyzed impact of craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma on survival in octogenarians and nonagenarians. Methods The study population included all patients aged ≥ 80 years who presented with acute traumatic SDHs 09/01/15 - 01/01/20, with radiography indicating operative eligibility (i.e. MLS >5 mm and/or overall thickness >10 mm). Of 1054 TBIs aged ≥ 80 years, 104 (9.87%) were surgically indicated. Of these, 35 received craniotomy and 69 received supportive measures due to family/patient wishes or surgeon's professional decision. We analyzed these data using a Poisson regression adjusted for influence of covariates. Of 35 craniotomies, 21 (60.00%) were deceased at 2 years of follow-up, compared to 48 (69.57%) deceased of 69 non-surgical patients. No significant demographic differences existed between these groups, other than age (craniotomy patients were younger; median age 84 vs 86; p < 0.001). In outcomes, the craniotomy cohort survived longer and in higher proportions (p = 0.028; Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon). When adjusting for covariates, this effect became more pronounced: craniotomy patients died at 41.1% the rate of non-surgical ones. Of all the covariates, only initial GCS significantly impacted the protective effect of craniotomy. In a logarithmic relationship, each point on initial GCS was associated with less benefit from surgery. We also found that patients with GCS< 3 were overall less likely to benefit from surgery. Our conclusions are limited by the impact of patient/surgeon choice on whether or not to operate. It is possible healthier subjects elected for craniotomies. We have attempted to correct for this by including comorbidities as covariates in our regression analyses. Our results indicate a surgical benefit for this elderly cohort, consistent with prior findings of benefit in the setting of severe traumatic aSDH. Patients with worse neurologic impairment, i.e. low GCS, had the greatest survival benefit from surgical intervention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34844161
pii: S0303-8467(21)00598-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107069
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107069Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.