Transcranial magnetic stimulation implementation on stroke prognosis.
Cerebrovascular disease
Motor evoked potentials
Prognosis
Recovery
Stroke
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Journal
Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1590-3478
Titre abrégé: Neurol Sci
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 100959175
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
02
10
2021
accepted:
25
11
2021
pubmed:
1
12
2021
medline:
28
1
2022
entrez:
30
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stroke represents a major cause of functional disability with increasing prevalence. Thus, it is imperative that stroke prognosis be both timely and valid. Up to today, several biomarkers have been investigated in an attempt to forecast stroke survivors' potential for motor recovery, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) being among them. A literature research of two databases (MEDLINE and Scopus) was conducted in order to trace all relevant studies published between 1990 and 2021 that focused on the potential utility of TMS implementation on stroke prognosis. Only full-text articles published in the English language were included. Thirty-nine articles have been traced and included in this review. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recording is indicative of a favorable prognosis concerning the motor recovery of upper and lower extremities' weakness, swallowing and speech difficulties, and the patient's general functional outcome. On the contrary, MEP absence is usually associated with poor prognosis. Relative correlations have also been made among other TMS variants (motor threshold, MEP amplitude, central motor conduction time) and the expected recovery rate. Overall, TMS represents a non-invasive, fast, safe, and reproducible prognostic tool poststroke that could resolve prognostic uncertainties in cases of stroke.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34846585
doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05791-1
pii: 10.1007/s10072-021-05791-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
873-888Informations de copyright
© 2021. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.
Références
Aho K, Harmsen P, Hatano S, Marquardsen J, Smirnov VE, Strasser T (1980) Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ 58(1):113–130
pubmed: 6966542
pmcid: 2395897
Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO et al (2020) Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol 76(25):2982–3021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010
pubmed: 33309175
pmcid: 7755038
Grefkes C, Fink GR (2020) Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives. Neurol Res Pract 2:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00060-6
doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00060-6
pubmed: 33324923
pmcid: 7650109
Katan M, Luft A (2018) Global burden of stroke. Semin Neurol 38(2):208–211. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649503
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1649503
pubmed: 29791947
Life after stroke | World Stroke Organization. https://www.world-stroke.org/world-stroke-day-campaign/why-stroke-matters/life-after-stroke . Accessed 25 Jul 2021
Hoonhorst MHWJ, Kollen BJ, van den Berg PSP, Emmelot CH, Kollen BJ, Kwakkel G (2014) How reproducible are transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced MEPs in subacute stroke? J Clin Neurophysiol 31(6):556–562. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000114
doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000114
pubmed: 25233245
Hendricks HT, Zwarts MJ, Plat EF, van Limbeek J (2002) Systematic review for the early prediction of motor and functional outcome after stroke by using motor-evoked potentials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(9):1303–1308. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.34284
doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.34284
pubmed: 12235613
Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ackerley SJ, Barber PA, Smith MC (2017) Predicting recovery potential for individual stroke patients increases rehabilitation efficiency. Stroke 48(4):1011–1019. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015790
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015790
pubmed: 28280137
Stinear CM (2017) Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: advances in biomarkers. The Lancet Neurol 16(10):826–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30283-1
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30283-1
pubmed: 28920888
Kim B, Winstein C (2017) Can neurological biomarkers of brain impairment be used to predict poststroke motor recovery? A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31(1):3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968316662708
doi: 10.1177/1545968316662708
pubmed: 27503908
Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston I (1985) Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1(8437):1106–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4
pubmed: 2860322
Boniface SJ (2001) Plasticity after acute ischaemic stroke studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71(6):713–715. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.71.6.713
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.6.713
pubmed: 11723187
pmcid: 1737633
Castel-Lacanal E, Tarri M, Loubinoux I, Gasq D, de Boissezon X, Marque P, Simonetta-Moreau M (2014) Transcranial magnetic stimulation in brain injury. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 33(2):83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annfar.2013.11.006
doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2013.11.006
pubmed: 24378049
Kubis N (2016) Non-invasive brain stimulation to enhance post-stroke recovery. Front Neural Circuits 10:56. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2016.00056
doi: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00056
pubmed: 27512367
pmcid: 4961863
van Kuijk AA, Pasman JW, Geurts ACH, Hendricks HT (2005) How salient is the silent period? The role of the silent period in the prognosis of upper extremity motor recovery after severe stroke. J Clin Neurophysiol 22(1):10–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnp.0000150975.83249.71
doi: 10.1097/01.wnp.0000150975.83249.71
pubmed: 15689709
Groppa S, Oliviero A, Eisen A, Quartarone A, Cohen LG, Mall V, Kaelin-Lang A, Mima T, Rossi S, Thickbroom GW, Rossini PM, Ziemann U, Valls-Sole J, Siebner HR (2012) A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 123(5):858–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.010
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.010
pubmed: 22349304
pmcid: 4890546
Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ward SH (2014) An update on predicting motor recovery after stroke. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 57(8):489–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2014.08.006
doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.08.006
pubmed: 25200094
Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ (2002) Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(11):1629–1637. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.35473
doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.35473
pubmed: 12422337
Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD (2007) Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain 130:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl333
doi: 10.1093/brain/awl333
pubmed: 17148468
Smith MC, Stinear CM (2016) Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in stroke: ready for clinical practice? J Clin Neurosci 31:10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.034
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.034
pubmed: 27394378
Takechi U, Matsunaga K, Nakanishi R et al (2014) Longitudinal changes of motor cortical excitability and transcallosal inhibition after subcortical stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 125(10):2055–2069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.01.034
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.01.034
pubmed: 24636830
Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Filippi M, Oliveri M, Palmieri MG, Pasqualetti P, Rossini PM (1999) A method to monitor motor cortical excitability in human stroke through motor evoked potentials. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 4(1):44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1385-299x(98)00063-4
doi: 10.1016/s1385-299x(98)00063-4
pubmed: 10234452
Rossini PM, Pauri F (2005) Chapter 16 - Transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke. Magnetic stimulation in clinical neurophysiology, Butterworth-Heinemann. 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7373-0.50019-5
Manganotti P, Patuzzo S, Cortese F, Palermo A, Smania N, Fiaschi A (2002) Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 113(6):936–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00062-7
doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00062-7
pubmed: 12048054
Talelli P, Greenwood RJ, Rothwell JC (2006) Arm function after stroke: Neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117(8):1641–1659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.016
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.016
pubmed: 16595189
Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, Speizer A, Chong JY, Lazar RM, Marshall RS, Krakauer JW (2008) Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22(1):64–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307305302
doi: 10.1177/1545968307305302
pubmed: 17687024
Veerbeek JM, Winters C, van Wegen EEH, Kwakkel G (2018) Is the proportional recovery rule applicable to the lower limb after a first-ever ischemic stroke? PLoS ONE 13(1):e0189279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189279
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189279
pubmed: 29329286
pmcid: 5766096
Stinear CM, Byblow WD (2014) Predicting and accelerating motor recovery after stroke. Curr Opini Neurol 27(6):624–630. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000153
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000153
Byblow WD, Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe MA, Ackerley SJ (2015) Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity. Ann Neurol 78(6):848–859. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24472
doi: 10.1002/ana.24472
pubmed: 26150318
Winters C, van Wegen EEH, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G (2015) Generalizability of the proportional recovery model for the upper extremity after an ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29(7):614–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314562115
doi: 10.1177/1545968314562115
pubmed: 25505223
Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ackerley SJ, Smith MC, Borges VM, Barber PA (2017) Proportional motor recovery after stroke: implications for trial design. Stroke 48(3):795–798. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016020
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016020
pubmed: 28143920
Smith M-C, Byblow WD, Barber PA, Stinear CM (2017) Proportional recovery from lower limb motor impairment after stroke. Stroke 48(5):1400–1403. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016478
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016478
pubmed: 28341754
Timmerhuis TPJ, Hageman G, Oosterloo SJ, Rozeboom AR (1996) The prognostic value of cortical magnetic stimulation in acute middle cerebral artery infarction compared to other parameters. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 98(3):231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-8467(96)00034-0
doi: 10.1016/0303-8467(96)00034-0
pubmed: 8884095
Vang C, Dunbabin D, Kilpatrick D (1999) Correlation between functional and electrophysiological recovery in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 30(10):2126–2130. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.10.2126
doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2126
pubmed: 10512917
Escudero JV, Sancho J, Bautista D, Escudero M, Lopez-Trigo J (1998) Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 29(9):1854–1859. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.29.9.1854
doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.9.1854
pubmed: 9731608
Trompetto C, Assini A, Buccolieri A, Marchese R, Abbruzzese G (2000) Motor recovery following stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol 111(10):1860–1867. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00419-3
doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00419-3
pubmed: 11018503
Misra UK, Kalita J (1995) Motor evoked potential changes in ischaemic stroke depend on stroke location. J Neurol Sci 134(1–2):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510x(95)00216-4
doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(95)00216-4
pubmed: 8747846
D’Olhaberriague L, EspadalerGamissans JM, Marrugat J, Valls A, Oliveras Ley C, Seoane JL (1997) Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a prognostic tool in stroke. J Neurol Sci 147(1):73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-510x(96)05312-9
doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(96)05312-9
pubmed: 9094063
Jo JY, Lee A, Kim MS, Park e Chang WH, Shin Y, Kim Y (2016) Prediction of motor recovery using quantitative parameters of motor evoked potential in patients with stroke. Ann Rehabil Med 40(5):806–815. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.5.806
doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.5.806
pubmed: 27847710
pmcid: 5108707
Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Bassi A, Rossini PM, Bernardi G (1997) Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke 28(1):110–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.1.110
doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.1.110
pubmed: 8996498
Cicinelli P, Traversa R, Rossini PM (1997) Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2–4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 105(6):438–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00052-0
doi: 10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00052-0
pubmed: 9448645
Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Pasqualetti P, Filippi M, Rossini PM (1998) Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ hemispheres in human stroke. Brain Res 24;803(1–2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00505-8
Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Oliveri M, Giuseppina Palmieri M, Filippi MM, Pasqualetti P, Rossini PM (2000) Neurophysiological follow-up of motor cortical output in stroke patients. Clin Neurophysiol 111(9):1695–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00373-4
doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00373-4
pubmed: 10964084
Arac N, Sagduyu A, Binai S, Ertekin C (1994) Prognostic value of transcranial magnetic stimulation in acute stroke. Stroke 25(11):2183–2186. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.25.11.2183
doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.11.2183
pubmed: 7974543
Rapisarda G, Bastings E, de Noordhout AM, Pennisi G, Delwaide PJ (1996) Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? Stroke 27(12):2191–2196. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.12.2191
doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.12.2191
pubmed: 8969779
Pennisi G, Rapisarda G, Bella R, Calabrese V, Maertens DN, Delwaide PJ (1999) Absence of response to early transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke patients prognostic value for hand motor recovery. Stroke 30(12):2666–2670. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.12.2666
doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.12.2666
pubmed: 10582994
Delvaux V, Alagona G, Gérard P, De Pasqua V, Pennisi G, de Noordhout AM (2003) Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 114(7):1217–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00070-1
doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00070-1
pubmed: 12842718
Pizzi A, Carrai R, Falsini C, Martini M, Verdesca S, Grippo A (2009) Prognostic value of motor evoked potentials in motor function recovery of upper limb after stroke. J Rehabil Med 41(8):654–660. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0389
doi: 10.2340/16501977-0389
pubmed: 19565160
Feys H, van Hees J, Bruyninckx F, Mercelis R, De Weerdt W (2000) Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68(3):323–331. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.68.3.323
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.68.3.323
pubmed: 10675214
pmcid: 1736845
Hoonhorst MHJ, Nijland RHM, van den Berg PJS, Emmelot CH, Kollen BJ, Kwakkel G (2018) Does transcranial magnetic stimulation have an added value to clinical assessment in predicting upper-limb function very early after severe stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 32(8):682–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968318785044
doi: 10.1177/1545968318785044
pubmed: 29972088
pmcid: 6099969
van Kuijk AA, Pasman JW, Hendricks HT, Zwarts MJ, Geurts ACH (2009) Predicting hand motor recovery in severe stroke: the role of motor evoked potentials in relation to early clinical assessment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308317578
doi: 10.1177/1545968308317578
pubmed: 18794218
Bakker CD, Massa M, Daffertshofer A, Pasman JW, van Kuijik AA, Kwakkel G, Stegeman DF (2019) The addition of the MEP amplitude of finger extension muscles to clinical predictors of hand function after stroke: a prospective cohort study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 37(5):445–456. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-180890
doi: 10.3233/RNN-180890
pubmed: 31322583
Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Archer SA, Mastaglia FL (2002) Motor outcome after subcortical stroke: MEPs correlate with hand strength but not dexterity. Clin Neurophysiol 113(12):2025–2029. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00318-8
doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00318-8
pubmed: 12464343
Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe M, Anwar S, Byblow WD (2012) The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain 135(8):2527–2535. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws146
doi: 10.1093/brain/aws146
pubmed: 22689909
Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ackerley SJ, Smith MC, Borges VM, Barber PA (2017) PREP2: a biomarker-based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke. Ann Clin Trans Neurol 4(11):811–820. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.488
doi: 10.1002/acn3.488
Smith MC, Ackerley SJ, Barber PA, Byblow WD, Stinear CM (2019) PREP2 algorithm predictions are correct at 2 years poststroke for most patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 33(8):635–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968319860481
doi: 10.1177/1545968319860481
pubmed: 31268414
Lundquist CB, Nielsen JF, Arguissain FG, Brunner IC (2021) Accuracy of the upper limb prediction algorithm PREP2 applied 2 weeks poststroke: a prospective longitudinal study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 35(1):68–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968320971763
doi: 10.1177/1545968320971763
pubmed: 33218284
Hendricks HT, Pasman JW, van Limbeek J, Zwarts MJ (2003) Motor evoked potentials of the lower extremity in predicting motor recovery and ambulation after stroke: a cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(9):1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00237-5
doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00237-5
pubmed: 13680577
Steube D, Wietholter S, Correll C (2001) Prognostic value of lower limb motor evoked potentials for motor impairment and disability after 8 weeks of stroke rehabilitation- a prospective investigation of 100 patients. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 41(8):463–469
pubmed: 11776659
Piron L, Piccione F, Tonin P, Dam M (2005) Clinical correlation between motor evoked potentials and gait recovery in poststroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86(9):1874–1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.007
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.007
pubmed: 16181957
Hwang P, Sohn MK, Jee S, Lee H (2016) Transcranial motor evoked potentials of lower limbs can prognosticate ambulation in hemiplegic stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med 40(3):383–391. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.3.383
doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.3.383
pubmed: 27446774
pmcid: 4951356
Chang MC, Do KH, Chun MH (2015) Prediction of lower limb motor outcomes based on transcranial magnetic stimulation findings in patients with an infarct of the anterior cerebral artery. Somatosens Mot Res 32(4):249–253. https://doi.org/10.3109/08990220.2015.1091769
doi: 10.3109/08990220.2015.1091769
pubmed: 26445327
Smith MC, Barber PA, Stinear CM (2017) The TWIST algorithm predicts time to walking independently after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31(10–11):955–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968317736820
doi: 10.1177/1545968317736820
pubmed: 29090654
Khedr EM, Abo-Elfetoh N, Ahmed MA, Kamel NF, Farook M, El Karn MF (2008) Dysphagia and hemispheric stroke: a transcranial magnetic study. Neurophysiol Clin 38(4):235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2008.04.004
doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.04.004
pubmed: 18662620
Lee KM, Joo MC, Yu YM, Kim M-S (2018) Mylohyoid motor evoked potentials can effectively predict persistent dysphagia 3 months poststroke. Neurogastroenterol Motil 30(7):e13323. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13323
doi: 10.1111/nmo.13323
pubmed: 29532576
Glize B, Villain M, Laganaro M, Guehl D, Dehail P, Joseph PA, Sibon I (2018) Motor evoked potentials of upper-limbs predict aphasia recovery. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 61:e48–e49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.05.106
doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.05.106
Glize B, Bigourdan A, Villain M et al (2019) Motor evoked potential of upper-limbs is predictive of aphasia recovery. Aphasiology 33(1):105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1444137
doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1444137
McDonnell MN, Stinear CM (2017) TMS measures of motor cortex function after stroke: a meta-analysis. Brain Stimul 10(4):721–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.03.008
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.03.008
pubmed: 28385535
Stinear C (2010) Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol 9(12):1228–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474
doi: 10.1016/S1474
pubmed: 21035399
Harvey RL (2015) Predictors of functional outcome following stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 26(4):583–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2015.07.002
doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.07.002
pubmed: 26522899
Bembenek JP, Kurczych K, Karli Nski M, Czlonkowska A (2012) The prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials in motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke − a systematic review of the literature. Funct Neurol 27(2):79–84
pubmed: 23158578
pmcid: 3812773
Rosso C, Lamy C-J (2020) Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: being pragmatic or innovative? Curr Opin Neurol 33(4):482–487. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000843
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000843
pubmed: 32657889