Clinical Tailoring of Baricitinib 2 mg in Atopic Dermatitis: Baseline Body Surface Area and Rapid Onset of Action Identifies Response at Week 16.

Atopic dermatitis Baricitinib Body surface area Clinical tailoring Clinical trial Janus kinase inhibitor

Journal

Dermatology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8210
Titre abrégé: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101590450

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 21 06 2021
accepted: 01 11 2021
pubmed: 1 12 2021
medline: 1 12 2021
entrez: 30 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, is indicated in the European Union and Japan for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy. In the ongoing, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial BREEZE-AD5, once-daily oral baricitinib 2-mg monotherapy improved disease in moderate-to-severe AD patients who had an inadequate response or intolerance to topical corticosteroids. This post-hoc analysis aimed to identify responders to baricitinib 2 mg, using a proposed clinical tailoring approach based on baseline body surface area (BSA) affected and early clinical improvement, in BREEZE-AD5. Classification and regression tree method was used to evaluate baseline predictors for the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) at week 16 among baricitinib 2-mg-treated patients. Two-by-two contingency tables evaluated the association between early response, defined as ≥ 50% improvement in BSA or ≥ 3-point improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale from baseline at weeks 4 or 8, and response at week 16 for the proportion of patients achieving EASI75, validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) score of 0 or 1, or ≥ 4-point improvement in Itch (Itch ≥ 4), respectively. Missing data were imputed as non-responder. At week 16, EASI75 and vIGA-AD (0,1) were achieved by 37.5% and 31.7% of baricitinib 2-mg-treated patients with baseline BSA 10-50% compared with 9.5% and 4.8% with BSA > 50%. Early response in skin inflammation or itch at week 4 was associated with corresponding EASI75, vIGA-AD (0,1), and Itch ≥ 4 of 55.4%, 48.2%, and 39.3% at week 16, while early response at week 8 was associated with 66.7%, 56.1%, and 42.1% of patients achieving these endpoints. Baseline BSA of 10-50% and early clinical improvement after 4 or 8 weeks of baricitinib 2-mg treatment may identify patients most likely to benefit from long-term baricitinib 2-mg therapy. NCT03435081. Baricitinib is a medication that helps a dysregulated immune system readjust. This leads to improvements in the inflammatory disease atopic dermatitis (AD). Baricitinib is approved for adults with moderate-to-severe AD in over 40 countries. In the ongoing study BREEZE-AD5, baricitinib 2 mg improved moderate-to-severe AD in patients who previously did not respond to or could not tolerate topical corticosteroids. Understanding which patients are likely to benefit most from a medication can improve patient experience with treatment. It can also ensure that only patients who are likely to benefit from a medication are exposed to it. This analysis aimed to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from baricitinib 2 mg in BREEZE-AD5, using an approach based on baseline body surface area (BSA) affected and early clinical improvement. We showed that patients with moderate-to-severe AD affecting between 10% and 50% of their BSA account for the majority of patients who respond to baricitinib 2 mg after 16 weeks of treatment. Clinical assessment of skin inflammation or itch in patients after 4–8 weeks of initiation of baricitinib 2-mg treatment further improved the ability to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from long-term therapy. This proposed clinical tailoring approach of baseline BSA of 10–50% and early clinical improvement after 4 or 8 weeks of baricitinib 2-mg treatment may allow for the treatment of patients who are most likely to respond to therapy, and rapid decision on discontinuation of treatment for those who are not likely to benefit from baricitinib 2 mg.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Baricitinib is a medication that helps a dysregulated immune system readjust. This leads to improvements in the inflammatory disease atopic dermatitis (AD). Baricitinib is approved for adults with moderate-to-severe AD in over 40 countries. In the ongoing study BREEZE-AD5, baricitinib 2 mg improved moderate-to-severe AD in patients who previously did not respond to or could not tolerate topical corticosteroids. Understanding which patients are likely to benefit most from a medication can improve patient experience with treatment. It can also ensure that only patients who are likely to benefit from a medication are exposed to it. This analysis aimed to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from baricitinib 2 mg in BREEZE-AD5, using an approach based on baseline body surface area (BSA) affected and early clinical improvement. We showed that patients with moderate-to-severe AD affecting between 10% and 50% of their BSA account for the majority of patients who respond to baricitinib 2 mg after 16 weeks of treatment. Clinical assessment of skin inflammation or itch in patients after 4–8 weeks of initiation of baricitinib 2-mg treatment further improved the ability to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from long-term therapy. This proposed clinical tailoring approach of baseline BSA of 10–50% and early clinical improvement after 4 or 8 weeks of baricitinib 2-mg treatment may allow for the treatment of patients who are most likely to respond to therapy, and rapid decision on discontinuation of treatment for those who are not likely to benefit from baricitinib 2 mg.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34846636
doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00640-7
pii: 10.1007/s13555-021-00640-7
pmc: PMC8776967
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03435081']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

137-148

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Brunner PM, Guttman-Yassky E, Leung DY. The immunology of atopic dermatitis and its reversibility with broad-spectrum and targeted therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(4s):S65-s76.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.011
Boguniewicz M, Fonacier L, Guttman-Yassky E, Ong PY, Silverberg J, Farrar JR. Atopic dermatitis yardstick: practical recommendations for an evolving therapeutic landscape. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;120(1):10-22.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.10.039
Czarnowicki T, He H, Krueger JG, Guttman-Yassky E. Atopic dermatitis endotypes and implications for targeted therapeutics. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(1):1–11.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.10.032
Silverberg JI, Gelfand JM, Margolis DJ, Boguniewicz M, Fonacier L, Grayson MH, et al. Patient burden and quality of life in atopic dermatitis in US adults: a population-based cross-sectional study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;121(3):340–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.07.006
Vakharia PP, Chopra R, Sacotte R, Patel KR, Singam V, Patel N, et al. Burden of skin pain in atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017;119(6):548-52.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.09.076
Andersen L, Nyeland ME, Nyberg F. Increasing severity of atopic dermatitis is associated with a negative impact on work productivity among adults with atopic dermatitis in France, Germany, the U.K. and the U.S.A. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(4):1007–16.
doi: 10.1111/bjd.18296
Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG, Krol A, Paller AS, Schwarzenberger K, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(1):116–32.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.023
Ring J, Alomar A, Bieber T, Deleuran M, Fink-Wagner A, Gelmetti C, et al. Guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(8):1045–60.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04635.x
Katayama I, Aihara M, Ohya Y, Saeki H, Shimojo N, Shoji S, et al. Japanese guidelines for atopic dermatitis 2017. Allergol Int. 2017;66(2):230–47.
doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2016.12.003
Sidbury R, Davis DM, Cohen DE, Cordoro KM, Berger TG, Bergman JN, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(2):327–49.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.030
Ring J, Alomar A, Bieber T, Deleuran M, Fink-Wagner A, Gelmetti C, et al. Guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) Part II. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(9):1176–93.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04636.x
Renert-Yuval Y, Guttman-Yassky E. New treatments for atopic dermatitis targeting beyond IL-4/IL-13 cytokines. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020;124(1):28–35.
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.10.005
Fridman JS, Scherle PA, Collins R, Burn TC, Li Y, Li J, et al. Selective inhibition of JAK1 and JAK2 is efficacious in rodent models of arthritis: preclinical characterization of INCB028050. J Immunol. 2010;184(9):5298–307.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902819
Olumiant. Australian Product Information. Eli Lilly Australia Pty Ltd. OLUMIANT vA6 Feb_2021. ARTG ID 277905. 2021. https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2018-PI-01225-1 . Accessed 25 Mar 2021.
Olumiant. European Union Summary of Product Characteristics. Eli Lilly and Company. 2021. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/olumiant-epar-product-information_en.pdf . Accessed 23 Mar 2021.
Olumiant. Japan Product Information. Eli Lilly and Company. 2021. https://www.info.pmda.go.jp/go/pdf/530471_3999043F1020_1_0 8. Accessed 21 Sept 2021.
Simpson EL, Forman S, Silverberg JI, Zirwas M, Maverakis E, Han G, et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopicdermatitis: results from a randomized monotherapy phase 3 trial in the United States and Canada (BREEZE-AD5). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(1):62–70.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.02.028
King B, Maari C, Lain E, Silverberg JI, Issa M, Holzwarth K, et al. Extended safety analysis of baricitinib 2 mg in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: an integrated analysis from eight randomized clinical trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021;22(3):395–405.
doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00602-x
Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Chamlin SL, Feldman SR, Hanifin JM, Simpson EL, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(2):338–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.10.010
Yosipovitch G, Reaney M, Mastey V, Eckert L, Abbé A, Nelson L, et al. Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: psychometric validation and responder definition for assessing itch in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(4):761–9.
doi: 10.1111/bjd.17744
Bieber T, D’Erme AM, Akdis CA, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Lauener R, Schappi G, et al. Clinical phenotypes and endophenotypes of atopic dermatitis: where are we, and where should we go? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(4s):S58-s64.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.008
Renert-Yuval Y, Thyssen JP, Bissonnette R, Bieber T, Kabashima K, Hijnen D, et al. Biomarkers in atopic dermatitis-a review on behalf of the International Eczema Council. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(4):1174-90.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.013
Curran-Everett D, Milgrom H. Post-hoc data analysis: benefits and limitations. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;13(3):223–4.
doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283609831
Chopra R, Silverberg JI. Assessing the severity of atopic dermatitis in clinical trials and practice. Clin Dermatol. 2018;36(5):606–15.
doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2018.05.012

Auteurs

Jonathan I Silverberg (JI)

Department of Dermatology, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA. jonathanisilverberg@gmail.com.

Mark Boguniewicz (M)

Division of Allergy-Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.

Jill Waibel (J)

Miami Dermatology and Laser Institute, Miami, FL, USA.

Jamie Weisman (J)

Medical Dermatology Specialists, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Lindsay Strowd (L)

Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Luna Sun (L)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Yuxin Ding (Y)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Meghan Feely (M)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Fabio P Nunes (FP)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Eric L Simpson (EL)

Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Classifications MeSH