Impact of Multimodality Imaging on the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Apical Thrombus in Patients After Anterior Myocardial Infarction.
Apical thrombus
Magnetic resonance imaging
Myocardial infarction
Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography
Two-dimensional echocardiography
Journal
The American journal of the medical sciences
ISSN: 1538-2990
Titre abrégé: Am J Med Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370506
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
received:
22
07
2020
revised:
12
03
2021
accepted:
17
06
2021
pubmed:
2
12
2021
medline:
23
4
2022
entrez:
1
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The presence of the left ventricle (LV) apical thrombus is one of the most critical complications of anterior myocardial infarction (MI). Due to the high risk of systemic embolization, the determination of LV apical thrombus (LVAT) is essential. We aimed to compare the two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), contrast-2DE and real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DE) in the diagnosis of LVAT and determine which imaging modality is superior. The study was designed as a prospective cohort study, and 161 patients were included. Patients with low ejection fraction (< 40%) and LV apical wall motion abnormality (severe hypokinetic, akinetic or dyskinetic) were included. 2DE, contrast-2DE, RT-3DE, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed on all patients within one month after anterior MI. Transthoracic 2DE detected thrombi in 29 patients, contrast-2DE detected thrombi in 33 patients, RT-3DE detected thrombi in 32 patients, and MRI detected thrombi in 28 patients. While MRI is accepted as the gold standard for non-invasive imaging, the specificity of detecting thrombus with 2DE is 90%, and the sensitivity is 57%, contrast-2DE had 82% sensitivity and 92% specificity for the detection of LVAT. The specificity for detecting thrombus with RT-3DE is 93%, and the sensitivity is 85%. Accuracy was 84%, 90% and 92% with 2DE, contrast-2DE and RT-3DE, respectively. We found that RT-3DE was more sensitive and more specific than 2DE and contrast-2DE in the diagnosis of LVAT. The diagnostic accuracy of RT-3DE was higher than 2DE and contrast-2DE for LVAT.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The presence of the left ventricle (LV) apical thrombus is one of the most critical complications of anterior myocardial infarction (MI). Due to the high risk of systemic embolization, the determination of LV apical thrombus (LVAT) is essential. We aimed to compare the two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), contrast-2DE and real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DE) in the diagnosis of LVAT and determine which imaging modality is superior.
METHODS
The study was designed as a prospective cohort study, and 161 patients were included. Patients with low ejection fraction (< 40%) and LV apical wall motion abnormality (severe hypokinetic, akinetic or dyskinetic) were included. 2DE, contrast-2DE, RT-3DE, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed on all patients within one month after anterior MI.
RESULTS
Transthoracic 2DE detected thrombi in 29 patients, contrast-2DE detected thrombi in 33 patients, RT-3DE detected thrombi in 32 patients, and MRI detected thrombi in 28 patients. While MRI is accepted as the gold standard for non-invasive imaging, the specificity of detecting thrombus with 2DE is 90%, and the sensitivity is 57%, contrast-2DE had 82% sensitivity and 92% specificity for the detection of LVAT. The specificity for detecting thrombus with RT-3DE is 93%, and the sensitivity is 85%. Accuracy was 84%, 90% and 92% with 2DE, contrast-2DE and RT-3DE, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
We found that RT-3DE was more sensitive and more specific than 2DE and contrast-2DE in the diagnosis of LVAT. The diagnostic accuracy of RT-3DE was higher than 2DE and contrast-2DE for LVAT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34848187
pii: S0002-9629(21)00411-0
doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2021.06.028
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
130-139Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.