Capturing the nature of events and event context using hierarchical event descriptors (HED).


Journal

NeuroImage
ISSN: 1095-9572
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9215515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 12 2021
Historique:
received: 21 05 2021
revised: 27 10 2021
accepted: 26 11 2021
pubmed: 2 12 2021
medline: 22 2 2022
entrez: 1 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Event-related data analysis plays a central role in EEG and MEG (MEEG) and other neuroimaging modalities including fMRI. Choices about which events to report and how to annotate their full natures significantly influence the value, reliability, and reproducibility of neuroimaging datasets for further analysis and meta- or mega-analysis. A powerful annotation strategy using the new third-generation formulation of the Hierarchical Event Descriptors (HED) framework and tools (hedtags.org) combines robust event description with details of experiment design and metadata in a human-readable as well as machine-actionable form, making event annotation relevant to the full range of neuroimaging and other time series data. This paper considers the event design and annotation process using as a case study the well-known multi-subject, multimodal dataset of Wakeman and Henson made available by its authors as a Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) dataset (bids.neuroimaging.io). We propose a set of best practices and guidelines for event annotation integrated in a natural way into the BIDS metadata file architecture, examine the impact of event design decisions, and provide a working example of organizing events in MEEG and other neuroimaging data. We demonstrate how annotations using HED can document events occurring during neuroimaging experiments as well as their interrelationships, providing machine-actionable annotation enabling automated within- and across-experiment analysis and comparisons. We discuss the evolution of HED software tools and have made available an accompanying HED-annotated BIDS-formated edition of the MEEG data of the Wakeman and Henson dataset (openneuro.org, ds003645).

Identifiants

pubmed: 34848298
pii: S1053-8119(21)01038-7
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118766
pmc: PMC8925904
mid: NIHMS1770954
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

118766

Subventions

Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB023297
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS047293
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R24 MH120037
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : RF1 MH125934
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors do not have any conflicts of interest.

Références

Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;9(1):17884
pubmed: 31784547
Biomed Eng Lett. 2019 Jan 4;9(1):53-71
pubmed: 30956880
J Neurosci. 2019 May 22;39(21):4113-4123
pubmed: 30867260
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Jun;130(6):986-996
pubmed: 31003117
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116054
pubmed: 31491523
Sci Data. 2016 Jun 21;3:160044
pubmed: 27326542
Front Neuroinform. 2019 Jan 08;12:102
pubmed: 30670959
Sci Data. 2019 Jun 25;6(1):102
pubmed: 31239438
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Aug;73(2):95-100
pubmed: 19414039
Sci Data. 2015 Jan 20;2:150001
pubmed: 25977808
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1441-50
pubmed: 21906689
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Aug 24;5:76
pubmed: 21904527
Front Neuroinform. 2016 Oct 17;10:42
pubmed: 27799907
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1975 Aug;39(2):131-43
pubmed: 50210
Trends Neurosci. 2021 Jul;44(7):510-512
pubmed: 33965213
Sci Data. 2018 Jun 19;5:180110
pubmed: 29917016
Neuroinformatics. 2021 Dec 30;:
pubmed: 34970709
Front Neurosci. 2019 Apr 24;13:300
pubmed: 31068770
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Nov;128(11):2334-2346
pubmed: 28838815
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Mar;22(3):309-21
pubmed: 15722203
J Biomech. 2020 Jun 9;106:109832
pubmed: 32517995
Sci Data. 2019 Jun 25;6(1):103
pubmed: 31239435
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 27;108(52):21270-5
pubmed: 22160686
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:116778
pubmed: 32289453

Auteurs

Kay Robbins (K)

Department of Computer Science, University of Texas San Antonio San Antonio, TX, United States. Electronic address: Kay.Robbins@utsa.edu.

Dung Truong (D)

Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92903-0559, United States.

Stefan Appelhoff (S)

Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Arnaud Delorme (A)

Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92903-0559, United States; Paul Sabatier University in Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Scott Makeig (S)

Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92903-0559, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH