Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.
breast surgery
breast tumours
plastic & reconstructive surgery
qualitative research
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 11 2021
30 11 2021
Historique:
entrez:
1
12
2021
pubmed:
2
12
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure following mastectomy. IBBR techniques are evolving rapidly, with mesh-assisted subpectoral reconstruction becoming the standard of care and more recently, prepectoral techniques being introduced. These muscle-sparing techniques may reduce postoperative pain, avoid implant animation and improve cosmetic outcomes and have been widely adopted into practice. Although small observational studies have failed to demonstrate any differences in the clinical or patient-reported outcomes of prepectoral or subpectoral reconstruction, high-quality comparative evidence of clinical or cost-effectiveness is lacking. A well-designed, adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to compare the techniques, but breast reconstruction RCTs are challenging. We, therefore, aim to undertake an external pilot RCT (Best-BRA) with an embedded QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) to determine the feasibility of undertaking a trial comparing prepectoral and subpectoral techniques. Best-BRA is a pragmatic, two-arm, external pilot RCT with an embedded QRI and economic scoping for resource use. Women who require a mastectomy for either breast cancer or risk reduction, elect to have an IBBR and are considered suitable for both prepectoral and subpectoral reconstruction will be recruited and randomised 1:1 between the techniques.The QRI will be implemented in two phases: phase 1, in which sources of recruitment difficulties are rapidly investigated to inform the delivery in phase 2 of tailored interventions to optimise recruitment of patients.Primary outcomes will be (1) recruitment of patients, (2) adherence to trial allocation and (3) outcome completion rates. Outcomes will be reviewed at 12 months to determine the feasibility of a definitive trial. The study has been approved by the National Health Service (NHS) Wales REC 6 (20/WA/0338). Findings will be presented at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. ISRCTN10081873.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure following mastectomy. IBBR techniques are evolving rapidly, with mesh-assisted subpectoral reconstruction becoming the standard of care and more recently, prepectoral techniques being introduced. These muscle-sparing techniques may reduce postoperative pain, avoid implant animation and improve cosmetic outcomes and have been widely adopted into practice. Although small observational studies have failed to demonstrate any differences in the clinical or patient-reported outcomes of prepectoral or subpectoral reconstruction, high-quality comparative evidence of clinical or cost-effectiveness is lacking. A well-designed, adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to compare the techniques, but breast reconstruction RCTs are challenging. We, therefore, aim to undertake an external pilot RCT (Best-BRA) with an embedded QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) to determine the feasibility of undertaking a trial comparing prepectoral and subpectoral techniques.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
Best-BRA is a pragmatic, two-arm, external pilot RCT with an embedded QRI and economic scoping for resource use. Women who require a mastectomy for either breast cancer or risk reduction, elect to have an IBBR and are considered suitable for both prepectoral and subpectoral reconstruction will be recruited and randomised 1:1 between the techniques.The QRI will be implemented in two phases: phase 1, in which sources of recruitment difficulties are rapidly investigated to inform the delivery in phase 2 of tailored interventions to optimise recruitment of patients.Primary outcomes will be (1) recruitment of patients, (2) adherence to trial allocation and (3) outcome completion rates. Outcomes will be reviewed at 12 months to determine the feasibility of a definitive trial.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
The study has been approved by the National Health Service (NHS) Wales REC 6 (20/WA/0338). Findings will be presented at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
ISRCTN10081873.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34848516
pii: bmjopen-2021-050886
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050886
pmc: PMC8634330
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e050886Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : CS-2016-16-019
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K025643/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):167-76
pubmed: 21598064
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Mar 13;7(3):e2119
pubmed: 31044105
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Sep;59(3):250-5
pubmed: 17721209
Br J Surg. 2016 Sep;103(10):1377-84
pubmed: 27462835
BMJ. 2013 Jan 08;346:e7586
pubmed: 23303884
Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Jul;57(1):1-5
pubmed: 16799299
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jun;109(7):2265-74
pubmed: 12045548
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 20;10(1):e035505
pubmed: 31964677
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Jul;72(7):1051-1059
pubmed: 31076195
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):251-258
pubmed: 28012977
Trials. 2018 Jan 19;19(1):50
pubmed: 29351790
Trials. 2014 Mar 14;15:80
pubmed: 24628821
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jan 07;3(12):e574
pubmed: 26893999
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;67(8):912-20
pubmed: 24811157
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jul 26;5(7):e1433
pubmed: 28831365
Breast J. 2017 Nov;23(6):670-676
pubmed: 28481477
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):387-394
pubmed: 19644253
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 1;113(4):1146-52
pubmed: 15083014
Br J Surg. 2000 Nov;87(11):1455-72
pubmed: 11091232
BJS Open. 2020 Feb;4(1):71-77
pubmed: 32011819
BJS Open. 2020 Oct;4(5):811-820
pubmed: 32762012
Breast Care (Basel). 2019 Dec;14(6):382-387
pubmed: 31933584
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jun 11;6(6):e1797
pubmed: 30276046
Ann Surg. 2008 Jun;247(6):1019-28
pubmed: 18520230
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971 Jun;47(6):565-7
pubmed: 5088650
BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1):
pubmed: 33609398
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 May;42(5):591-603
pubmed: 27005885
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981 Mar;67(3):312-7
pubmed: 7232564
Ann Surg. 2019 May;269(5):836-841
pubmed: 30308615
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Mar;111(3):1060-8
pubmed: 12621175
Br J Surg. 2015 Oct;102(11):1360-71
pubmed: 26179938
Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Sep;55(3):232-9
pubmed: 16106158
Gland Surg. 2018 Aug;7(Suppl 1):S64-S69
pubmed: 30175066
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Aug;120(2):373-381
pubmed: 17632337
Eur J Plast Surg. 2014;37(11):599-604
pubmed: 25339795
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 May;141(5):1077-1084
pubmed: 29697602
PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002147
pubmed: 27755555
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Aug 4;2:41
pubmed: 27965859
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;106:108-120
pubmed: 30339938
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(5):503-8
pubmed: 17399659
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;43(9):1636-1646
pubmed: 28528191
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Feb;68(2):162-7
pubmed: 25455288
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(4):e703-e711
pubmed: 29275104
Breast Cancer. 2008;15(3):185-91
pubmed: 18575951
Br J Surg. 2015 Jan;102(1):45-56
pubmed: 25451179
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Jul 08;3(6):e412
pubmed: 26180713
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan;43(1):52-61
pubmed: 27776942
Qual Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(5):672-679
pubmed: 30791819
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Jan 29;10(1):3
pubmed: 31997021
Breast. 2017 Oct;35:182-190
pubmed: 28768227
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):254-266
pubmed: 30639093
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;44(5):708-716
pubmed: 29472041
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov;130(5 Suppl 2):57S-66S
pubmed: 23096987
Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Jan;56(1):22-5
pubmed: 16374090
Trials. 2016 Jun 08;17(1):283
pubmed: 27278130
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Jun;73(6):1043-1049
pubmed: 32008945
Trials. 2020 Apr 6;21(1):316
pubmed: 32252788
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;47(11):2807-2813
pubmed: 34088587
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 26;10(1):e033641
pubmed: 31988232
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Aug;69(2):134-8
pubmed: 21734545
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jun;87(6):493-498
pubmed: 25266930
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):345-353
pubmed: 19644246
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jan 07;3(12):e577
pubmed: 26894002