An overview of systematic reviews to determine the impact of socio-environmental factors on health outcomes of people with disabilities.
attitudinal
environment
health outcome
physical
social
Journal
Health & social care in the community
ISSN: 1365-2524
Titre abrégé: Health Soc Care Community
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306359
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
revised:
05
10
2021
received:
09
08
2021
accepted:
18
11
2021
pubmed:
2
12
2021
medline:
9
6
2022
entrez:
1
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
People with disabilities are often subject to intersecting layers of social and economic disadvantage and other barriers that drive health inequity. As a result, they frequently experience worse health than people without disabilities, beyond the direct effects of their health condition or impairment. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews was to summarise the evidence on the impact of socio-environmental factors (i.e. social, physical or attitudinal) on the health outcomes of disabled people. A systematic search of five databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus) for English-language articles from January 2000 to April 2021 was conducted. Abstracts were screened by two reviewers and reviews were critically appraised. Key data were extracted by topic, population, disability type, critical appraisal method, socio-environmental themes and health outcomes. There were 23 systematic reviews identified examining adult (60.9%) or child and young (8.7%) disabled people, with 30.4% not specifying an age range. Reviews examined people with neurological or physical (39.1%), intellectual (17.4%), sensory (8.7%) or a range of (34.8%) disabilities. Three key health outcomes (i.e. access to healthcare, health-promoting behaviour and care quality) and several recurring socio-environmental themes related to the health outcomes of disabled people were identified. Disabled people encounter common social, physical and attitudinal factors that hinder their health outcomes in terms of access to services and quality healthcare. Many preventive health services were identified as either inaccessible or not meeting the needs of disabled people. Greater involvement of disabled people in service design and awareness raising is essential.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1254-1274Informations de copyright
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Andresen, E. M., Peterson-Besse, J. J., Krahn, G. L., Walsh, E. S., Horner-Johnson, W., & Iezzoni, L. I. (2013). Pap, mammography, and clinical breast examination screening among women with disabilities: A systematic review. Womens Health Issues, 23, e205-e214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2013.04.002
Attree, P. (2004). Growing up in disadvantage: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Child: Care, Health and Development, 30, 679-689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00480.x
Attree, P., & Milton, B. (2006). Critically appraising qualitative research for systematic reviews: Defusing the methodological cluster bombs. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2, 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426406775249688
Ayorinde, A. A., Williams, I., Mannion, R., Song, F., Skrybant, M., Lilford, R. J., & Chen, Y.-F. (2020). Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study. PLoS One, 15, e0227580. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227580
Banks, L. M., Mearkle, R., Mactaggart, I., Walsham, M., Kuper, H., & Blanchet, K. (2017). Disability and social protection programmes in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Oxford Development Studies, 45, 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1142960
Barr, M., Duncan, J., & Dally, K. (2018). A systematic review of services to DHH children in rural and remote regions. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 23, 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enx059
Beverley, C. A., Bath, P. A., & Booth, A. (2004). Health information needs of visually impaired people: A systematic review of the literature. Health and Social Care in the Community, 12, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00460.x
Bloemen, M. A. T., Backx, F. J. G., Takken, T., Wittink, H., Benner, J., Mollema, J., & Groot, J. F. (2015). Factors associated with physical activity in children and adolescents with a physical disability: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 57, 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12624
Bodde, A. E., & Seo, D. C. (2009). A review of social and environmental barriers to physical activity for adults with intellectual disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 2, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.11.004
Booth, A., & Brice, A. (2001). Research Column: The CRItical Skills Training in Appraisal for Librarians (CriSTAL) project. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 18, 175-177.
Bowen, C. N., Havercamp, S. M., Karpiak Bowen, S., & Nye, G. (2020). A call to action: Preparing a disability-competent health care workforce. Disability and Health Journal, 13, 100941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100941
Bradbury-Jones, C., Rattray, J., Jones, M., & MacGillivray, S. (2013). Promoting the health, safety and welfare of adults with learning disabilities in acute care settings: A structured literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22, 1497-1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12109
Breckenridge, J. P., Devaney, J., Kroll, T., Lazenbatt, A., Taylor, J., & Bradbury-Jones, C. (2014). Access and utilisation of maternity care for disabled women who experience domestic abuse: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 14, 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-234
Calder, A., Sole, G., & Mulligan, H. (2018). The accessibility of fitness centers for people with disabilities: A systematic review. Disability and Health Journal, 11, 525-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.04.002
Caldwell, K., Henshaw, L., & Taylor, G. (2011). Developing a framework for critiquing health research: An early evaluation. Nurse Education Today, 31, e1-e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.11.025
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Common barriers to participation experienced by people with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-barriers.html
Cho, H., MacLachlan, M., Clarke, M., & Mannan, H. (2016). Accessible home environments for people with functional limitations: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(8), 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080826
Craig Hospital Research Department. (2001). Craig hospital inventory of environmental factors (CHIEF). Version 3.0., 33.
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018a). CASP cohort study checklist. Retreived from https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018.pdf
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018b). CASP qualitative checklist. Retrieved from https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018.pdf
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018c). CASP systematic review checklist. Retrieved from https://casp-uk.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CASP-Systematic-Review-Checklist-2018_fillable-form.pdf
da Rosa, S. V., Moysés, S. J., Theis, L. C., Soares, R. C., Moysés, S. T., Werneck, R. I., & Rocha, J. S. (2020). Barriers in access to dental services hindering the treatment of people with disabilities: A systematic review. International Journal of Dentistry, 2020, 9074618. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9074618
Daly, J., Willis, K., Small, R., Green, J., Welch, N., Kealy, M., & Hughes, E. (2007). A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.014
Department of Health Long-Term Conditions NSF Team. (2005). The national service framework for long-term conditions. Department of Health.
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 52, 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.52.6.377
Drainoni, M.-L., Lee-Hood, E., Tobias, C., Bachman, S. S., Andrew, J., & Maisels, L. (2006). Cross-disability experiences of barriers to health-care access. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 17, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073060170020101
Edwards, D. J., Sakellariou, D., & Anstey, S. (2020). Barriers to, and facilitators of, access to cancer services and experiences of cancer care for adults with a physical disability: A mixed methods systematic review. Disability and Health Journal, 13, 100844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100844
Effective Public Health Practice Project. (2018). Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Retreived from https://merst.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/quality-assessment-tool_2010.pdf
Eisenberg, Y., Vanderbom, K. A., & Vasudevan, V. (2017). Does the built environment moderate the relationship between having a disability and lower levels of physical activity? A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 95S, S75-S84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.019
Gibson, J. C., & O’Connor, R. J. (2010). Access to health care for disabled people: A systematic review. Social Care and Neurodisability, 1(3), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.5042/scn.2010.0599
Halcomb, E. J., Peters, K., & Smyth, E. (2019). Health screening for women with physical disability in Australian general practice: A survey. Collegian, 26, 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2018.07.008
Hashemi, G., Wickenden, M., Bright, T., & Kuper, H. (2020). Barriers to accessing primary healthcare services for people with disabilities in low and middle-income countries, a Meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1817984
Heideveld-Gerritsen, M., van Vulpen, M., Hollander, M., Oude Maatman, S., Ockhuijsen, H., & van den Hoogen, A. (2021). Maternity care experiences of women with physical disabilities: A systematic review. Midwifery, 96, 102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.102938
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 343, d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
Homeyard, C., Montgomery, E., Chinn, D., & Patelarou, E. (2016). Current evidence on antenatal care provision for women with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Midwifery, 32, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.10.002
Horner-Johnson, W., Moe, E. L., Stoner, R. C., Klein, K. A., Edelman, A. B., Eden, K. B., Andresen, E. M., Caughey, A. B., & Guise, J.-M. (2019). Contraceptive knowledge and use among women with intellectual, physical, or sensory disabilities: A systematic review. Disability and Health Journal, 12, 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.11.006
Iacono, T., Bigby, C., Unsworth, C., Douglas, J., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2014). A systematic review of hospital experiences of people with intellectual disability. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0505-5
Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). (2020). Critical appraisal tools. Retrieved from https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
Kavanagh, A. (2020). Disability and public health research in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 44, 262-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13003
Law, M. D., Stewart, D., Pollock, N., Letts, L., Bosch, J., & Westmorland, M. (1998). Critical review form-Quantitative studies. Retrieved from https://healthsci.mcmaster.ca/docs/librariesprovider130/default-document-library/critical-review-form-quantitative-studies-english6b5cae38a17849c8abad24efed28e4a8.pdf?sfvrsn=952932a2_2
Lawler, D., Lalor, J., & Begley, C. (2013). Access to maternity services for women with a physical disability: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Childbirth, 3, 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1891/2156-5287.3.4.203
Letts, L., Wilkins, S., Law, M., Stewart, D., Bosch, J., & Westmorland, M. (2007). Critical review form-Qualitative studies. Version 2.0. Retrieved from https://healthsci.mcmaster.ca/docs/librariesprovider130/default-document-library/critical-review-form-qualitative-studies-version-2-1.pdf?sfvrsn=6723c450_2
Lindsay, S. (2016). Child and youth experiences and perspectives of cerebral palsy: A qualitative systematic review. Child: Care, Health and Development, 42, 153-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12309
Malli, M. A., Sams, L., Forrester-Jones, R., Murphy, G., & Henwood, M. (2018). Austerity and the lives of people with learning disabilities. A thematic synthesis of current literature. Disability & Society, 33, 1412-1435. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1497950
Marrocco, A., & Krouse, H. J. (2017). Obstacles to preventive care for individuals with disability: Implications for nurse practitioners. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 29(5), 282-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12449
Martin Ginis, K. A., Ma, J. K., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., & Rimmer, J. H. (2016). A systematic review of review articles addressing factors related to physical activity participation among children and adults with physical disabilities. Health Psychology Review, 10(4), 478-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2016.1198240
Matin, B. K., Williamson, H. J., Karyani, A. K., Rezaei, S., Soofi, M., & Soltani, S. (2021). Barriers in access to healthcare for women with disabilities: A systematic review in qualitative studies. BMC Womens Health, 21, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01189-5
Merten, J. W., Pomeranz, J. L., King, J. L., Moorhouse, M., & Wynn, R. D. (2015). Barriers to cancer screening for people with disabilities: A literature review. Disability and Health Journal, 8(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.06.004
Mithen, J., Aitken, Z., Ziersch, A., & Kavanagh, A. M. (2015). Inequalities in social capital and health between people with and without disabilities. Social Science and Medicine, 126, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.009
Mulligan, H. F., Hale, L. A., Whitehead, L., & Baxter, G. D. (2012). Barriers to physical activity for people with long-term neurological conditions: A review study. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 29(3), 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.29.3.243
National People with Disabilities and Carer Council. (2009). SHUT OUT: The experience of people with disabilities and their families in Australia. Australian Government.
Newhouse, R. P., Dearholt, S. L., Poe, S. S., Pugh, L. C., & White, K. M. (2007). Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice model and guidelines.
Newitt, R., Barnett, F., & Crowe, M. (2016). Understanding factors that influence participation in physical activity among people with a neuromusculoskeletal condition: A review of qualitative studies. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.996676
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89, 1245-1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
Olaussen, S. J., & Renzaho, A. M. N. (2016). Establishing components of cultural competence healthcare models to better cater for the needs of migrants with disability: A systematic review. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 22, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY14114
Pace, R., Pluye, P., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., & Seller, R. (2012). Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002
Pelleboer-Gunnink, H. A., Van Oorsouw, W. M. W. J., Van Weeghel, J., & Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2017). Mainstream health professionals' stigmatising attitudes towards people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 61, 411-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12353
Pollock, M., Fernandes, R. M., Becker, L. A., Pieper, D., & Hartling, L. (2021) Overviews of reviews. In J. P. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, & V. A. Welch (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Training. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
Reichard, A., Stolzle, H., & Fox, M. H. (2011). Health disparities among adults with physical disabilities or cognitive limitations compared to individuals with no disabilities in the United States. Disability and Health Journal, 4, 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.05.003
Robertson, J., Raghavan, R., Emerson, E., Baines, S., & Hatton, C. (2019). What do we know about the health and health care of people with intellectual disabilities from minority ethnic groups in the United Kingdom? A systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32, 1310-1334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12630
Russell, C. K., & Gregory, D. M. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 6, 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.6.2.36
Satchidanand, N., Gunukula, S. K., Lam, W. Y., McGuigan, D., New, I., Symons, A. B., Withiam-Leitch, M., & Akl, E. A. (2012). Attitudes of healthcare students and professionals toward patients with physical disability: A systematic review. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 533-545. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182555ea4
Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., Henry, D. A., & Boers, M. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
The Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). Checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses. Retrieved from http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Trounson, J. S., Gibbs, J., Kostrz, K., McDonald, R., & Peters, A. (2020). A systematic literature review of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander engagement with disability services. Disability & Society, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1862640
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Population Division. (2020). World Population Ageing 2020. United Nations.
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147, 573-577. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
Wade, D. T., & Halligan, P. W. (2004). Do biomedical models of illness make for good health care systems? BMJ, 329, 1398-1401. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1398
Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2006). Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery, 22, 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2005.05.004
Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O’Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Oxford.
Wilbur, J., Torondel, B., Hameed, S., Mahon, T., & Kuper, H. (2019). Systematic review of menstrual hygiene management requirements, its barriers and strategies for disabled people. PLoS One, 14, e0210974. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210974
Wilson, N. J., Macdonald, J., Hayman, B., Bright, A. M., Frawley, P., & Gallego, G. (2018). A narrative review of the literature about people with intellectual disability who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex or questioning. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 171-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629516682681
World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. WHO.
World Health Organization. (2021). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
Yang, E., Kim, H. J., Ryu, H., & Chang, S. J. (2020). Diabetes self-care behaviors in adults with disabilities: A systematic review. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 17, e12289. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12289
Zaza, S., Wright-De Agüero, L. K., Briss, P. A., Truman, B. I., Hopkins, D. P., Hennessy, M. H., Sosin, D. M., Anderson, L., Carande-Kulis, V. G., Teutsch, S. M., & Pappaioanou, M. (2000). Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18, 44-74.