Handheld chromatic pupillometry can accurately and rapidly reveal functional loss in glaucoma.
glaucoma
optic nerve
pupil
Journal
The British journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1468-2079
Titre abrégé: Br J Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0421041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
received:
23
06
2021
accepted:
06
11
2021
medline:
24
4
2023
pubmed:
3
12
2021
entrez:
2
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Early detection and treatment of glaucoma can delay vision loss. In this study, we evaluate the performance of handheld chromatic pupillometry (HCP) for the objective and rapid detection of functional loss in glaucoma. In this clinic-based, prospective study, we enrolled 149 patients (median (IQR) years: 68.5 (13.6) years) with confirmed glaucoma and 173 healthy controls (55.2 (26.7) years). Changes in pupil size in response to 9 s of exponentially increasing blue (469 nm) and red (640 nm) light-stimuli were assessed monocularly using a custom-built handheld pupillometer. Pupillometric features were extracted from individual traces and compared between groups. Features with the highest classification potential, selected using a gradient boosting machine technique, were incorporated into a generalised linear model for glaucoma classification. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses (ROC) were used to compare the performance of HCP, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Humphrey Visual Field (HVF). Pupillary light responses were altered in glaucoma compared with controls. For glaucoma classification, HCP yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.96), a sensitivity of 87.9% and specificity of 88.4%. The classification performance of HCP in early-moderate glaucoma (visual field mean deviation (VFMD) > -12 dB; AUC=0.91 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.95)) was similar to HVF (AUC=0.91) and reduced compared with OCT (AUC=0.97; p=0.01). For severe glaucoma (VFMD ≤ -12 dB), HCP had an excellent classification performance (AUC=0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 1) that was similar to HVF and OCT. HCP allows for an accurate, objective and rapid detection of functional loss in glaucomatous eyes of different severities.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Early detection and treatment of glaucoma can delay vision loss. In this study, we evaluate the performance of handheld chromatic pupillometry (HCP) for the objective and rapid detection of functional loss in glaucoma.
METHODS
In this clinic-based, prospective study, we enrolled 149 patients (median (IQR) years: 68.5 (13.6) years) with confirmed glaucoma and 173 healthy controls (55.2 (26.7) years). Changes in pupil size in response to 9 s of exponentially increasing blue (469 nm) and red (640 nm) light-stimuli were assessed monocularly using a custom-built handheld pupillometer. Pupillometric features were extracted from individual traces and compared between groups. Features with the highest classification potential, selected using a gradient boosting machine technique, were incorporated into a generalised linear model for glaucoma classification. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses (ROC) were used to compare the performance of HCP, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Humphrey Visual Field (HVF).
RESULTS
Pupillary light responses were altered in glaucoma compared with controls. For glaucoma classification, HCP yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.96), a sensitivity of 87.9% and specificity of 88.4%. The classification performance of HCP in early-moderate glaucoma (visual field mean deviation (VFMD) > -12 dB; AUC=0.91 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.95)) was similar to HVF (AUC=0.91) and reduced compared with OCT (AUC=0.97; p=0.01). For severe glaucoma (VFMD ≤ -12 dB), HCP had an excellent classification performance (AUC=0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 1) that was similar to HVF and OCT.
CONCLUSION
HCP allows for an accurate, objective and rapid detection of functional loss in glaucomatous eyes of different severities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34853018
pii: bjophthalmol-2021-319938
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319938
pmc: PMC10176376
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
663-670Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: DM has a patent application based on the pupillometry protocol used in the present study (PCT/SG2015/050494): A method and system for monitoring and/or assessing pupillary responses. RPN, TA and DM have a patent application based on the handheld pupillometer used in this study (PCT/SG2018/050204): Handheld ophthalmic and neurological screening device. The rest of the authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Vision Res. 2010 Jan;50(1):72-87
pubmed: 19850061
J Glaucoma. 2009 Feb;18(2):124-8
pubmed: 19225348
Ophthalmology. 2015 Sep;122(9):1777-85
pubmed: 26299721
Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:123-8
pubmed: 19668555
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Jun;126(6):849-56
pubmed: 18541852
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 22;11(8):e0161175
pubmed: 27548480
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;42(9):815-24
pubmed: 24725214
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;156(6):1285-1296.e2
pubmed: 24011523
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Jun 5;121(11):1015-9
pubmed: 18706250
Ophthalmology. 2013 Nov;120(11):2217-25
pubmed: 23809274
Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):759-64
pubmed: 22305097
Ophthalmology. 2011 Aug;118(8):1551-7
pubmed: 21529958
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 13;6:33373
pubmed: 27622679
Ophthalmology. 1982 Sep;89(9):991-8
pubmed: 7177577
Front Neurol. 2019 Apr 12;10:360
pubmed: 31031692
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Oct;56(11):6394-403
pubmed: 26444720
Ophthalmology. 2018 Sep;125(9):1362-1371
pubmed: 29573814
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Jan;124(1):12-9
pubmed: 16401779
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;27(1):10-18
pubmed: 31517561
Front Neurol. 2019 Feb 12;10:76
pubmed: 30809186
Ophthalmology. 2009 Aug;116(8):1564-73
pubmed: 19501408
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jun;121(6):1185-93
pubmed: 24485921
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 10;4(1):e003996
pubmed: 24413347
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Aug;85(5):519-25
pubmed: 17573859
J Optom. 2017 Oct - Dec;10(4):226-232
pubmed: 27543383
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 10;32(41):14242-53
pubmed: 23055493
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 21;52(7):4362-7
pubmed: 21498620
Eye (Lond). 2020 Jan;34(1):116-128
pubmed: 31740802
BMC Neurol. 2021 May 26;21(1):211
pubmed: 34039302
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 20;9(1):4945
pubmed: 30894608
Doc Ophthalmol. 1986 Jun 16;63(1):45-54
pubmed: 3732012
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Apr 08;52(5):2287-92
pubmed: 21212172
Curr Eye Res. 2017 May;42(5):743-747
pubmed: 27897448
Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90
pubmed: 24974815
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;133(8):938-46
pubmed: 26043441
Vision Res. 2007 Mar;47(7):946-54
pubmed: 17320141
Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Feb;118(2):235-45
pubmed: 10676789
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;254(7):1361-70
pubmed: 27099948
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 07;7:43832
pubmed: 28266650