Tree mortality submodels drive simulated long-term forest dynamics: assessing 15 models from the stand to global scale.
climate change impacts
forest dynamics
model comparison
mortality modeling
succession
Journal
Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)
ISSN: 2150-8925
Titre abrégé: Ecosphere
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596096
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
16
12
2018
accepted:
28
12
2018
entrez:
2
12
2021
pubmed:
20
2
2019
medline:
20
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Models are pivotal for assessing future forest dynamics under the impacts of changing climate and management practices, incorporating representations of tree growth, mortality, and regeneration. Quantitative studies on the importance of mortality submodels are scarce. We evaluated 15 dynamic vegetation models (DVMs) regarding their sensitivity to different formulations of tree mortality under different degrees of climate change. The set of models comprised eight DVMs at the stand scale, three at the landscape scale, and four typically applied at the continental to global scale. Some incorporate empirically derived mortality models, and others are based on experimental data, whereas still others are based on theoretical reasoning. Each DVM was run with at least two alternative mortality submodels. Model behavior was evaluated against empirical time series data, and then, the models were subjected to different scenarios of climate change. Most DVMs matched empirical data quite well, irrespective of the mortality submodel that was used. However, mortality submodels that performed in a very similar manner against past data often led to sharply different trajectories of forest dynamics under future climate change. Most DVMs featured high sensitivity to the mortality submodel, with deviations of basal area and stem numbers on the order of 10-40% per century under current climate and 20-170% under climate change. The sensitivity of a given DVM to scenarios of climate change, however, was typically lower by a factor of two to three. We conclude that (1) mortality is one of the most uncertain processes when it comes to assessing forest response to climate change, and (2) more data and a better process understanding of tree mortality are needed to improve the robustness of simulated future forest dynamics. Our study highlights that comparing several alternative mortality formulations in DVMs provides valuable insights into the effects of process uncertainties on simulated future forest dynamics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34853712
doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2616
pii: ECS22616
pmc: PMC8609442
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e02616Subventions
Organisme : Austrian Science Fund FWF
ID : Y 895
Pays : Austria
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors.
Références
Oecologia. 2011 Feb;165(2):533-44
pubmed: 21104278
Ecol Appl. 2018 Mar;28(2):522-540
pubmed: 29266516
Oecologia. 1986 Mar;68(4):567-579
pubmed: 28311714
Ecol Appl. 2015 Jul;25(5):1303-18
pubmed: 26485957
Landsc Ecol. 2017 Jul;32(7):1485-1498
pubmed: 28684889
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 28;106(17):7063-6
pubmed: 19365070
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Oct;26(10):523-32
pubmed: 21802765
Science. 2005 Nov 11;310(5750):987-91
pubmed: 16284171
Nat Clim Chang. 2014 Sep 1;4(9):806-810
pubmed: 25737744
Nature. 2001 Oct 11;413(6856):591-6
pubmed: 11595939
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Jun;19(6):1827-40
pubmed: 23505061
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 4;111(9):3280-5
pubmed: 24344265
Nature. 2010 Sep 23;467(7314):411-2
pubmed: 20864992
New Phytol. 2013 Oct;200(2):304-321
pubmed: 24004027
Am J Bot. 1999 Jan;86(1):1-16
pubmed: 21680341
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 4;111(9):3228-32
pubmed: 24344316
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Jul;19(7):2117-32
pubmed: 23504870
Nature. 2015 Mar 19;519(7543):344-8
pubmed: 25788097
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Nov;23(11):4788-4797
pubmed: 28417562
Nat Clim Chang. 2017 Jun;7:395-402
pubmed: 28861124