CT-Guided Percutaneous Vertebroplasty of the Cervico-Thoracic Junction for the Management of Pathologic Fracture or Symptomatic Lytic Lesion in Cancer Patients.
Cementoplasty
Fractures
Interventional radiology
Pain management
Spinal neoplasms
Journal
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
ISSN: 1432-086X
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003538
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
28
04
2021
accepted:
29
09
2021
pubmed:
3
12
2021
medline:
4
2
2022
entrez:
2
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this retrospective observational study is to report author's experience in computed-tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) of the cervicothoracic junction. The records of all consecutive patients treated by PV at levels C7, T1, T2, and T3 in a tertiary cancer center during year 2020 were extracted from the Institutional electronic archive. Following data were collected: demographics, indication for PV, procedure features, outcomes, and complications. Technical success was defined as when the trocar was placed into the vertebral body, allowing the injection of polymethyl-metacrylate (PMMA). Eleven patients were identified who received PV on 14 levels. Mean procedure duration was 57 ± 22 min (range [31-142]). A "trans-pedicular approach at the targeted level" was used in 1 vertebra (7%), a "costotransverse approach, at the targeted level" was used in 1 vertebra (7%), a "transpedicular approach via the level below" was used in 3 vertebrae (22%), and a "costotransverse approach via the level below" was used in 9 vertebrae (64%). Meantime to deploy each trocar was 20 ± 5 min (range [12-32]). Technical success was achieved in 14/14 (100%) of vertebrae. Mean postoperative hospitalization duration was 1.9 ± 1.7 days (range [1-11]). According to CIRSE classification, no adverse event occurred. PMMA leakage occurred in two patients; both remained asymptomatic. This study provides arguments in favor of safety and efficiency of CT-guided vertebroplasty of levels C7, T1, T2, and T3, for both trocar deployment and monitoring of the vertebral body filling during the PMMA injection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34853875
doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-03018-6
pii: 10.1007/s00270-021-03018-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Cements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
244-248Informations de copyright
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).
Références
Cazzato RL, de Marini P, Auloge P, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty of the cervical spine performed via a posterior trans-pedicular approach. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:591–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07198-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07198-6
pubmed: 32851445
Clarençon F, Fahed R, Cormier E, et al. Safety and effectiveness of cervical vertebroplasty: report of a large cohort and systematic review. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:1571–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06525-w .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06525-w
pubmed: 31748859
Bayley E, Clamp J, Boszczyk BM. Percutaneous approach to the upper thoracic spine: optimal patient positioning. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2009;18:1986–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1075-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1075-9
Tsoumakidou G, Too CW, Koch G, et al. CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40:331–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1574-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1574-8
pubmed: 28105496
Seong J-Y, Kim J-S, Jung B, et al. CT-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of an upper thoracic compression fracture. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10:185. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.185 .
doi: 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.185
pubmed: 19270865
pmcid: 2651434
Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC, et al. A novel classification System for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the spine oncology study group. Spine. 2010;35:E1221–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e16ae2 .
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e16ae2
pubmed: 20562730
Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, et al. Cirse quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: the cirse classification system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40:1141–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1703-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1703-4
pubmed: 28584945
Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244 .
doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244
pubmed: 23208313
Moulin B, Tselikas L, De Baere T, et al. CT guidance assisted by electromagnetic navigation system for percutaneous fixation by internal cemented screws (FICS). Eur Radiol. 2020;30:943–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06408-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06408-0
pubmed: 31478088
Lal H, Neyaz Z, Nath A, Borah S. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of intrathoracic lesions. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13:210–26. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.210 .
doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.210
pubmed: 22438689
pmcid: 3303905
Boulter DJ, Rumboldt Z, Bonaldi G, et al. Tilting the gantry for CT-guided spine procedures. Radiol Med (Torino). 2014;119:750–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0344-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s11547-013-0344-1