A Response-Time-Based Latent Response Mixture Model for Identifying and Modeling Careless and Insufficient Effort Responding in Survey Data.
careless responses
data screening
item response theory
mixture modeling
response times
Journal
Psychometrika
ISSN: 1860-0980
Titre abrégé: Psychometrika
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376503
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
25
08
2020
revised:
11
10
2021
pubmed:
3
12
2021
medline:
9
6
2022
entrez:
2
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Careless and insufficient effort responding (C/IER) can pose a major threat to data quality and, as such, to validity of inferences drawn from questionnaire data. A rich body of methods aiming at its detection has been developed. Most of these methods can detect only specific types of C/IER patterns. However, typically different types of C/IER patterns occur within one data set and need to be accounted for. We present a model-based approach for detecting manifold manifestations of C/IER at once. This is achieved by leveraging response time (RT) information available from computer-administered questionnaires and integrating theoretical considerations on C/IER with recent psychometric modeling approaches. The approach a) takes the specifics of attentive response behavior on questionnaires into account by incorporating the distance-difficulty hypothesis, b) allows for attentiveness to vary on the screen-by-respondent level, c) allows for respondents with different trait and speed levels to differ in their attentiveness, and d) at once deals with various response patterns arising from C/IER. The approach makes use of item-level RTs. An adapted version for aggregated RTs is presented that supports screening for C/IER behavior on the respondent level. Parameter recovery is investigated in a simulation study. The approach is illustrated in an empirical example, comparing different RT measures and contrasting the proposed model-based procedure against indicator-based multiple-hurdle approaches.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34855118
doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09817-7
pii: 10.1007/s11336-021-09817-7
pmc: PMC9166878
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
593-619Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;10(4):419-33
pubmed: 26177945
Psychol Bull. 2010 May;136(3):450-70
pubmed: 20438146
Assessment. 2021 Jul;28(5):1301-1319
pubmed: 31976748
Science. 2021 Apr 23;372(6540):338-340
pubmed: 33888624
J Pers Assess. 1997 Feb;68(1):139-51
pubmed: 16370774
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(1):56-74
pubmed: 26609743
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2013 Aug;35(8):1958-71
pubmed: 23787346
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):400-7
pubmed: 25761395
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2015 Nov;68(3):456-77
pubmed: 25873487
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Aug;111(2):218-29
pubmed: 26927958
Psychol Methods. 2014 Dec;19(4):528-41
pubmed: 24773355
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Jul-Aug;51(4):540-53
pubmed: 27269482
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Nov;73 Suppl 1:83-112
pubmed: 31709521
J Appl Psychol. 2015 May;100(3):828-45
pubmed: 25495093
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 May;71(2):205-228
pubmed: 29044460
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 Feb;70(1):159-181
pubmed: 28130934
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2019 Nov;72(3):401-425
pubmed: 31049942
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2019 Nov;72(3):393-400
pubmed: 31721155
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Feb;82(1):29-56
pubmed: 34992306
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2019 Nov;72(3):466-485
pubmed: 30919943
Dev Sci. 2007 May;10(3):307-21
pubmed: 17444972
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):437-55
pubmed: 22506584