Platelet-rich plasma for the management of intrauterine adhesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Asherman's syndrome
Intrauterine adhesions
Meta-analysis
PRP
Platelet-rich plasma
Journal
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
ISSN: 2468-7847
Titre abrégé: J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101701588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
16
08
2021
revised:
13
11
2021
accepted:
25
11
2021
pubmed:
3
12
2021
medline:
9
2
2022
entrez:
2
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) infusion after adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) by establishing the evidence from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar databases were screened from inception till June 2021. Risk of bias of included studies was evaluated according to the Cochrane's Collaboration tool. The efficacy endpoints were summarized as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) under the fixed-effects model. Three RCTs met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 260 patients (132 and 128 patients were allocated to PRP and control groups, respectively). The RCTs revealed an overall low risk of bias. Compared with the control group, the PRP group had a statistically significant higher rate of patients with IUAs grade I-II after intervention (n = 3 RCTs, RR=1.23, 95% CI [1.11 to 1.36], p<0.001), higher duration of menstrual menses after intervention (n = 3 RCTs, MD=1.13 days, 95% CI [0.86 to 1.41], p<0.001), and higher amount of menstrual menses after intervention (n = 3 RCTs, MD=2.96 pads, 95% CI [0.31 to 3.61], p<0.001). All pooled analyses were homogeneous. PRP treatment after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is effective in decreasing the IUA grade and improving the duration and amount of menstrual menses. Nonetheless, additional RCTs are warranted to validate these conclusions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34856385
pii: S2468-7847(21)00213-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102276
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102276Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement The authors report no conflict of interest.