Dosimetry in Clinical Radiopharmaceutical Therapy of Cancer: Practicality Versus Perfection in Current Practice.

RPT dosimetry radionuclide radiopharmaceutical therapy theranostics

Journal

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
ISSN: 1535-5667
Titre abrégé: J Nucl Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0217410

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 14 10 2021
revised: 22 10 2021
entrez: 3 12 2021
pubmed: 4 12 2021
medline: 6 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The use of radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) in the treatment of cancers is growing rapidly, with more agents becoming available for clinical use in last few years and many new RPTs being in development. Dosimetry assessment is critical for personalized RPT, insofar as administered activity should be assessed and optimized in order to maximize tumor-absorbed dose while keeping normal organs within defined safe dosages. However, many current clinical RPTs do not require patient-specific dosimetry based on current Food and Drug Administration-labeled approvals, and overall, dosimetry for RPT in clinical practice and trials is highly varied and underutilized. Several factors impede rigorous use of dosimetry, as compared with the more convenient and less resource-intensive practice of empiric dosing. We review various approaches to applying dosimetry for the assessment of activity in RPT and key clinical trials, the extent of dosimetry use, the relative pros and cons of dosimetry-based versus fixed activity, and practical limiting factors pertaining to current clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34857623
pii: jnumed.121.262977
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262977
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

60S-72S

Informations de copyright

© 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Auteurs

Neeta Pandit-Taskar (N)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; pandit-n@mskcc.org.

Amir Iravani (A)

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Dan Lee (D)

Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Heather Jacene (H)

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Dan Pryma (D)

Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Thomas Hope (T)

University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and.

Babak Saboury (B)

National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Jacek Capala (J)

National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Richard L Wahl (RL)

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH