Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Lymph Node Yield and Positivity in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Cancers.
anterior resection
colorectal cancer
crm involvement
laparoscopic colorectal surgery
lymph node metastasis
lymph node status
lymph node yield
open colorectal surgery
perineural invasion
vascular invasion
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
accepted:
29
10
2021
entrez:
3
12
2021
pubmed:
4
12
2021
medline:
4
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and is the third most common cause of cancer deaths in the UK. The status of lymph node metastasis is a key factor for predicting the prognosis of a patient's CRC. Aims This study aimed to analyze the demographics of left-sided colonic and rectal cancers at a single institution. We looked closely at the correlation between patient age and various histological factors. We tried to find any significant difference in lymph node yield (LNY) between laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS). We aimed to identify any statistical correlation between LNY and lymph node positivity (LNP) with other patient, surgical and histopathological features. Methodology This is a retrospective, non-interventional review of consecutive patients who underwent left-sided colonic and rectal cancer resections over a three-year period between 01 April 2018 and 31 March 2021. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were used. Chi-squared / Fisher exact test was used on a categorical scale between two or more groups and non-parametric setting for qualitative data analysis. Results A total of 102 patients were included in the study. No statistical correlation was found between the age of the patient with the LNY, LNP, location of the tumor, type, and urgency of the operation. LNY ranged between one and 43 nodes (median (interquartile range (IQR)) 17, 8). There was no statistically significant difference in LNY between laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) (p=0.1449). Significant statistical correlation was identified between LNP and completeness of resection (CoR) (p=0.039), vascular invasion (VI) (p<0.001), perineural invasion (PI) (p<0.001), and circumferential resectional margin involvement (CRMI) (p=0.039). Discussion LNY and LNP are important prognostic indices in colorectal cancer. Patient age, tumor location, the urgency of surgery, and consultant experience did not significantly impact the LNY. Our study showed a positive correlation between LNP and CRMI, VI and PI comparable to literature. Contrary to other studies, we found no statistical significance between LS vs. OS and LNY. Whether 12 nodes per patient is an appropriate level remains controversial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34858756
doi: 10.7759/cureus.19115
pmc: PMC8614181
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e19115Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021, Ballanamada Appaiah et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:406517
pubmed: 22312505
Int J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun 27;2020:6789709
pubmed: 32685211
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009 May;133(5):781-6
pubmed: 19415953
J Surg Oncol. 2011 Nov 1;104(6):667-71
pubmed: 21337344
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;31(9):1577-94
pubmed: 27469525
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Feb;21(1):14-6
pubmed: 21304381
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Mar;401(2):181-8
pubmed: 26879192
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Mar;16(3):585-93
pubmed: 19116751
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jan 27;4(1):9-19
pubmed: 22347537
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Nov;49(11):1673-83
pubmed: 17019656
J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;107(8):828-34
pubmed: 23592545
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Oct 04;55(10):
pubmed: 31590275
Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(10):1257-66
pubmed: 24103076
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 7;21(17):5167-75
pubmed: 25954090
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Aug 04;20:1369-75
pubmed: 25087904
Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 Oct 14;13:968
pubmed: 31921339
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb 28;20(8):1951-60
pubmed: 24587671
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Feb;10(2):157-64
pubmed: 17477849
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2014 Jun;45(2):133-6
pubmed: 24382601
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jul;31(7):1299-305
pubmed: 27220610
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Feb;55(2):197-204
pubmed: 22228164
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct;19(10):888-894
pubmed: 28649796
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4
pubmed: 20180029
Eur J Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;27(3):187-96
pubmed: 22212865
Br J Cancer. 2007 Mar 12;96(5):828-31
pubmed: 17311019
Cancers (Basel). 2011 Jun 23;3(2):2767-810
pubmed: 24212832
Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Oct;33(10):1547-53
pubmed: 19661781
Ann Oncol. 2011 Jan;22(1):110-117
pubmed: 20595447