Self-management of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions: What is most useful to patients? Protocol for a mixed methods systematic review.
MSK
acceptability
acceptance
musculoskeletal
self-care
self-management
Journal
Musculoskeletal care
ISSN: 1557-0681
Titre abrégé: Musculoskeletal Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101181344
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
04
11
2021
accepted:
13
11
2021
pubmed:
4
12
2021
medline:
15
6
2022
entrez:
3
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are the leading cause of disability in the United Kingdom, leading to ever-growing waiting lists. Clinical guidelines highlight that most musculoskeletal conditions resolve in time and with little clinical input, and so supporting people to self-manage is recommended to optimise healthcare resources. Despite this, the term self-management remains ambiguous and to date no systematic review has evaluated if self-management is a suitable, acceptable, and effective intervention/strategy for managing all MSK conditions. This protocol is informed and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). An advanced convergent qualitative meta-integration mixed-studies design will be used. Using a comprehensive predetermined search strategy, databases, key journals and grey literature will be searched independently by two reviewers. The reviewers will independently assess eligibility, complete data extraction, and evaluate for risk of bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The overall quality of included studies will be evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. Data from mixed-methods studies will be transformed using a process of fractionation and analysed alongside the data extracted from the quantitative and qualitative studies, using descriptive analysis and thematic analysis, respectively. No research ethics are required for this systematic review since patient data will not be collected. The review will help to inform healthcare professionals and researchers on the most suitable, acceptable, and effective intervention/strategy for self-managing MSK conditions. Results of this review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
271-278Informations de copyright
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Arthritis and Musculoskleletal Alliance. (2018). Policy Position Paper: Supported self-management for people with arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions (pp. 1-6).
Babatunde, O. O., Jordan, J. L., Van Der Windt, D. A., Hill, J. C., Foster, N. E., & Protheroe, J. (2017). Effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: A systematic overview of current evidence. PLoS One, 12(6).
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2010). Choosing a mixed methods design. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 53-106.
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2019). CASP (systematic review) checklist Accessed: 24/06/2021. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10(1), 45-53.
Frantzen, K. K., & Fetters, M. D. (2016). Meta-integration for synthesizing data in a systematic mixed studies review: Insights from research on autism spectrum disorder. Quality and Quantity, 50(5), 2251-2277.
Goodwin, N., & Naylor, C. (2010). Managing people with long-term conditions. An inquiry into the quality of general practice in England long-term conditions. Inquiry, 98.
Gough, D., James, T., & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs\\rand methods art. Systematic Reviews, 1, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
Grady, P. A., & Gough, L. L. (2018). Self-management: A comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. American Journal of Public Health, 108(8), S430-S436.
Greenhough, C. (2017). National back pain pathway. Trauma programme of care. NHS England.
Heyvaert, M., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2013). Mixed methods research synthesis: Definition, framework, and potential. Quality and Quantity, 47(2), 659-676.
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., Welch, V. A. (editors). 2021. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.2 (Updated February 2021).
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., Sarah, E., Kadoorie, L., Dixon-Woods, M., McCulloch, P., Wyatt, J. C., Phelan, A. W. C., & Michie, S. (2014). Better reporting of interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ, 348(March), 1-12.
Hong, Q., P. Pluye, S. Fàbregues, G. Bartlett, et al. (2018). Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. User guide. McGill 1-11.
Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Bujold, M., & Wassef, M. (2017). Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: Implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 61.
Jordan, K. P., Kadam, U. T., Hayward, R., Porcheret, M., Young, C., & Croft, P. (2010). Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: An observational study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11.
Lill A. R., Copeland, S., & Rocca, E. (Eds.), (2020). Rethinking causality, complexity and evidence for the unique patient.
Lin, I., Wiles, L., Waller, R., Goucke, R., Nagree, Y., Gibberd, M., Straker, L., Maher, C. G., & O’Sullivan, P. P. B. (2020). What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: Systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(2), 79-86.
Lorig, K. R., & Holman, H. R. (2003). Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26(1), 1-7.
Martinez-Calderon, J., Flores-Cortes, M., Morales-Asencio, J. M., Fernandez-Sanchez, M., & Luque-Suarez, A. (2020). Which interventions enhance pain self-efficacy in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, including over 12 000 participants. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 50(8), 418-430.
Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1).
National Institute for Care and Excellence. (2014). Osteoarthritis: Care and management | guidance and guidelines. NICE.
National Institute for Care and Excellence. (2015). Osteoarthritis: Quality Standard [QS87]. NICE.
National Institute for Care and Excellence. (2017). Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: Assessment and management NICE guideline [NG59]. NICE, 63(2), 120.
National Voices. (2014). Supporting self-management. A summary of the evidence. Key themes from 228 Sytematic reviews. National Voices.
NHS England. (2017). Transforming musculoskeletal and orthopaedic elective care services: A handbook for local health and care systems.
NHS England. (2019). The NHS long term plan.
Nicholl, B. I., L. F. Sandal, M. J. Stochkendahl, M. McCallum, N. Suresh, et al. Digital support interventions for the self-management of low back pain: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19(5):1-21.
Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: Mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 29-45.
PROSPERO. (2021). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/
Public Health England. (2019). Musculoskeletal health: A 5 year strategic framework for prevention across the lifecourse department of health and social care working with public health England and Department for work and Pensions. PHE Publications Gateway.
Ring, N., Ruth, J., & Ritchie, K. (2011). Methods of synthesizing qualitative research studies for health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 27(4), 384-390.
Rodham, K. (2020). Self-management for persistent pain: The blame, shame and inflame game. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Barroso, J. (2006). Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 29.
H. Schünemann, J. Brożek, G. Guyatt, & A. Oxman (Eds.), (2013). GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. The GRADE Working.
Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017). Acceptability of healthcare interventions: An overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 1-13.
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Paul, S., Stewart, L. A., Altman, D. G., Booth, A., Chan, A. W., Chang, S., Clifford, T., Kay, D., Egger, M., Gøtzsche, P. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Groves, T., Helfand, M., … Whitlock, E. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349.
Shepperd, S., Lewin, S., Straus, S., Clarke, M., Eccles, M. P., Fitzpatrick, R., Wong, G., & Aziz, S. (2009). Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLoS Medicine, 6(8).
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 1-10.
TIDieR-Checklist. (2014). Equator-network. https://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/TIDieR-Checklist-PDF.pdf
Tricco, A. C., Soobiah, C., Antony, J., Cogo, E., Macdonald, H., Lillie, E., Tran, J., D’Souza, J., Hui, W., Perrier, L., Welch, V., Horsley, T., Straus, S. E., & Kastner, M. (2016). A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 19-28.
Versus Arthritis. (2020). Musculoskeletal decision support tools. https://www.versusarthritis.org/about-arthritis/healthcare-professionals/musculoskeletal-decision-support-tools/
Vos, T., Abajobir, A. A., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K., Abate, K. H., Abd-Allah, F., Abdulle, A. M., Abebo, T. A., Abera, S. F., Aboyans, V., Abu-Raddad, L. J., Ackerman, I. N., Adamu, A. A., Adetokunboh, O., Afarideh, M., Afshin, A., Agarwal, S. K., Aggarwal, R., Agrawal, A., … Murray, C. J. L., et al. (2016). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of disease study 2016. The Lancet, 390(10100), 1211-1259.