Developmental trajectories of spatial-sequential and spatial-simultaneous working memory in Down syndrome.


Journal

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR
ISSN: 1365-2788
Titre abrégé: J Intellect Disabil Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9206090

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2022
Historique:
revised: 01 10 2021
received: 30 11 2020
accepted: 26 10 2021
pubmed: 4 12 2021
medline: 27 1 2022
entrez: 3 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Working memory (WM) is generally considered an area of weakness in the cognitive profile associated with Down syndrome (DS). The great majority of studies explored WM in this population through a comparison with typical development (TD) on the basis of mental age or developmental level. However, it is also relevant to understand how these skills develop and whether such development could be more related to chronological or developmental level. In the present study, we explored cross-sectional developmental trajectories of spatial-sequential and spatial-simultaneous WM in individuals with DS across chronological age and developmental level. Typically developing children (TD) of similar mental age were also included as a comparison group. Eighty-four individuals with DS (aged between 7 and 30 years) and 327 children with TD (aged between 4 and 8 years) were administered with tasks to assess spatial-sequential and spatial-simultaneous WM, together with tasks to assess both general verbal and spatial developmental levels. Performance in spatial-simultaneous WM task was lower compared with spatial-sequential WM task in both groups. In the case of individuals with DS, the developmental trajectories of chronological age are better described through a segmented model showing increased performance until approximately 13 years of age, followed by a rather flat progress. In the case of TD children, developmental trajectories are better described through a linear model in the spatial-simultaneous WM task when chronological age is considered; in the spatial-sequential WM, the increase in performance with age was however characterised by a discontinuity at age 6. The increase in performance followed a linear pattern in both groups (DS and TD) without substantial differences between the types of measure used (verbal vs. spatial) when the developmental level is considered.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Working memory (WM) is generally considered an area of weakness in the cognitive profile associated with Down syndrome (DS). The great majority of studies explored WM in this population through a comparison with typical development (TD) on the basis of mental age or developmental level. However, it is also relevant to understand how these skills develop and whether such development could be more related to chronological or developmental level. In the present study, we explored cross-sectional developmental trajectories of spatial-sequential and spatial-simultaneous WM in individuals with DS across chronological age and developmental level. Typically developing children (TD) of similar mental age were also included as a comparison group.
METHODS
Eighty-four individuals with DS (aged between 7 and 30 years) and 327 children with TD (aged between 4 and 8 years) were administered with tasks to assess spatial-sequential and spatial-simultaneous WM, together with tasks to assess both general verbal and spatial developmental levels.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION
Performance in spatial-simultaneous WM task was lower compared with spatial-sequential WM task in both groups. In the case of individuals with DS, the developmental trajectories of chronological age are better described through a segmented model showing increased performance until approximately 13 years of age, followed by a rather flat progress. In the case of TD children, developmental trajectories are better described through a linear model in the spatial-simultaneous WM task when chronological age is considered; in the spatial-sequential WM, the increase in performance with age was however characterised by a discontinuity at age 6. The increase in performance followed a linear pattern in both groups (DS and TD) without substantial differences between the types of measure used (verbal vs. spatial) when the developmental level is considered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34859907
doi: 10.1111/jir.12904
pmc: PMC9299792
doi:

Banques de données

figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.17032628']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

81-93

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disibilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Apr;16(2):317-22
pubmed: 8021317
Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):556-9
pubmed: 1736359
Dev Psychol. 2022 Jun 06;:
pubmed: 35666924
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Jan;72:33-41
pubmed: 29080484
Am J Ment Retard. 2008 Mar;113(2):117-32
pubmed: 18240873
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 1997 May 1;2(2):101-22
pubmed: 25420199
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Jan;39(1):84-96
pubmed: 18581223
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):669-75
pubmed: 23123880
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;43(3):353-64
pubmed: 11944877
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Apr;52(2):336-58
pubmed: 19252129
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;54(7):754-62
pubmed: 23718731
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 May;53(5):474-83
pubmed: 19396941
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2015 Jun;169(2):135-49
pubmed: 25989505
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Jun;45(3):531-44
pubmed: 12069005
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2001 Apr;45(Pt 2):157-68
pubmed: 11298256
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994 Jul;36(7):586-93
pubmed: 8034120
J Ment Defic Res. 1988 Apr;32 ( Pt 2):153-62
pubmed: 2969418
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2000;6(2):84-95
pubmed: 10899801
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 May;54(2):397-420
pubmed: 11394054
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015 May;120(3):193-202
pubmed: 25928432
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 Dec;54(12):1058-66
pubmed: 21029233
J Ment Defic Res. 1990 Feb;34 ( Pt 1):49-57
pubmed: 2139131
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2022 Jan;66(1-2):81-93
pubmed: 34859907
Child Neuropsychol. 2015;21(4):481-9
pubmed: 24814650
Am J Ment Retard. 1989 Mar;93(5):521-6
pubmed: 2523225
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Jun;37(6):637-51
pubmed: 10390025
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Jul;35(7):1473-500
pubmed: 24755229
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3421-32
pubmed: 23920025
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Sep;62(9):759-774
pubmed: 29984471
Am J Ment Retard. 2004 Nov;109(6):456-66
pubmed: 15471512
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109 Suppl 2:17261-5
pubmed: 23045661
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Jan;62(1):30-40
pubmed: 29124810
Am J Ment Retard. 2004 Nov;109(6):467-80
pubmed: 15471513

Auteurs

B Carretti (B)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

C Meneghetti (C)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

E Doerr (E)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

E Toffalini (E)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

S Lanfranchi (S)

Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH