Users' Perceptions Toward mHealth Technologies for Health and Well-being Monitoring in Pregnancy Care: Qualitative Interview Study.
acceptance
design
mHealth service
mobile health
mobile phone
pregnancy care
wearable sensors
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Dec 2021
02 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
09
03
2021
accepted:
15
10
2021
revised:
23
09
2021
entrez:
3
12
2021
pubmed:
4
12
2021
medline:
4
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, such as wearable sensors, smart health devices, and mobile apps, that are capable of supporting pregnancy care are emerging. Although mHealth could be used to facilitate the tracking of health changes during pregnancy, challenges remain in data collection compliance and technology engagement among pregnant women. Understanding the interests, preferences, and requirements of pregnant women and those of clinicians is needed when designing and introducing mHealth solutions for supporting pregnant women's monitoring of health and risk factors throughout their pregnancy journey. This study aims to understand clinicians' and pregnant women's perceptions on the potential use of mHealth, including factors that may influence their engagement with mHealth technologies and the implications for technology design and implementation. A qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted with 4 pregnant women, 4 postnatal women, and 13 clinicians working in perinatal care. Clinicians perceived the potential benefit of mHealth in supporting different levels of health and well-being monitoring, risk assessment, and care provision in pregnancy care. Most pregnant and postnatal female participants were open to the use of wearables and health monitoring devices and were more likely to use these technologies if they knew that clinicians were monitoring their data. Although it was acknowledged that some pregnancy-related medical conditions are suitable for an mHealth model of remote monitoring, the clinical and technical challenges in the introduction of mHealth for pregnancy care were also identified. Incorporating appropriate health and well-being measures, intelligently detecting any abnormalities, and providing tailored information for pregnant women were the critical aspects, whereas usability and data privacy were among the main concerns of the participants. Moreover, this study highlighted the challenges of engaging pregnant women in longitudinal mHealth monitoring, the additional work required for clinicians to monitor the data, and the need for an evidence-based technical solution. Clinical, technical, and practical factors associated with the use of mHealth to monitor health and well-being in pregnant women need to be considered during the design and feasibility evaluation stages. Technical solutions and appropriate strategies for motivating pregnant women are critical to supporting their long-term data collection compliance and engagement with mHealth technology during pregnancy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, such as wearable sensors, smart health devices, and mobile apps, that are capable of supporting pregnancy care are emerging. Although mHealth could be used to facilitate the tracking of health changes during pregnancy, challenges remain in data collection compliance and technology engagement among pregnant women. Understanding the interests, preferences, and requirements of pregnant women and those of clinicians is needed when designing and introducing mHealth solutions for supporting pregnant women's monitoring of health and risk factors throughout their pregnancy journey.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to understand clinicians' and pregnant women's perceptions on the potential use of mHealth, including factors that may influence their engagement with mHealth technologies and the implications for technology design and implementation.
METHODS
METHODS
A qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted with 4 pregnant women, 4 postnatal women, and 13 clinicians working in perinatal care.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Clinicians perceived the potential benefit of mHealth in supporting different levels of health and well-being monitoring, risk assessment, and care provision in pregnancy care. Most pregnant and postnatal female participants were open to the use of wearables and health monitoring devices and were more likely to use these technologies if they knew that clinicians were monitoring their data. Although it was acknowledged that some pregnancy-related medical conditions are suitable for an mHealth model of remote monitoring, the clinical and technical challenges in the introduction of mHealth for pregnancy care were also identified. Incorporating appropriate health and well-being measures, intelligently detecting any abnormalities, and providing tailored information for pregnant women were the critical aspects, whereas usability and data privacy were among the main concerns of the participants. Moreover, this study highlighted the challenges of engaging pregnant women in longitudinal mHealth monitoring, the additional work required for clinicians to monitor the data, and the need for an evidence-based technical solution.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Clinical, technical, and practical factors associated with the use of mHealth to monitor health and well-being in pregnant women need to be considered during the design and feasibility evaluation stages. Technical solutions and appropriate strategies for motivating pregnant women are critical to supporting their long-term data collection compliance and engagement with mHealth technology during pregnancy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34860665
pii: v5i12e28628
doi: 10.2196/28628
pmc: PMC8686472
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e28628Informations de copyright
©Jane Li, David Silvera-Tawil, Marlien Varnfield, M Sazzad Hussain, Vanitha Math. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 02.12.2021.
Références
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 17;6(1):e23
pubmed: 29343463
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 12;7(4):e11819
pubmed: 30977740
JMIR Cardio. 2018 Oct 31;2(2):e10183
pubmed: 31758781
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Apr 10;5(4):e42
pubmed: 28396302
Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(4):313-8
pubmed: 23899373
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 20;20(3):e95
pubmed: 29559424
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 9;8(11):e18907
pubmed: 33164904
Digit Health. 2019 Feb 06;5:2055207619828220
pubmed: 30792878
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 26;5(5):e73
pubmed: 28550005
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017 Apr;19(4):16
pubmed: 28243807
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;149(3):339-346
pubmed: 32119129
Heart. 2014 Nov;100(22):1770-9
pubmed: 24973083
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 19;20(4):e119
pubmed: 29674314
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jul;127:1-8
pubmed: 31128820
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Feb 28;10(430):
pubmed: 29491186
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 10;7(7):e13817
pubmed: 31293246
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 24;8(1):12799
pubmed: 30143660
Acta Med Austriaca. 2004;31(5):182-4
pubmed: 15747996
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Oct;23(10):833-841
pubmed: 28475431
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Sep 2;22(5):
pubmed: 33406530
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb;18 Suppl 2:S3-S13
pubmed: 26784127
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 May 30;6(5):e130
pubmed: 29848473
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;59(2):251-257
pubmed: 29900538
Diabetologia. 2019 Jun;62(6):877-887
pubmed: 30963188
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 24;6(4):e109
pubmed: 29691216
BMC Med. 2012 May 10;10:47
pubmed: 22574949
J Pregnancy. 2013;2013:537526
pubmed: 23781339
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 30;7(1):e11836
pubmed: 30698533
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 01;7(5):e10520
pubmed: 31042154
BJOG. 2004 Apr;111(4):298-302
pubmed: 15008762
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;251:11-14
pubmed: 29968589
Front Physiol. 2018 Jun 28;9:743
pubmed: 30002629
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Oct 28;3(4):e99
pubmed: 26510886