Self-evaluation as an active ingredient in the experience and treatment of adolescent depression; an integrated scoping review with expert advisory input.
Adolescence
Depression
Self
Youth involvement
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 12 2021
03 12 2021
Historique:
received:
02
03
2021
accepted:
02
11
2021
entrez:
4
12
2021
pubmed:
5
12
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Negative self-perceptions is one of the most common symptoms of depression in young people, and has been found to be strongly associated with severity of depression symptoms. Psychological treatments for adolescent depression are only moderately effective. Understanding the role and importance of these self-perceptions may help to inform and improve treatments. The aim of this review was to examine self-evaluation as a characteristic of adolescent depression, and as an active ingredient in treatment for adolescent depression. We conducted a scoping review which included quantitative and qualitative studies of any design that reported on self-evaluation as a characteristic of, or focus of treatment for, adolescent depression. Participants were required to be 11-24 years and experiencing elevated symptoms of depression or a diagnosis. We also met with 14 expert advisory groups of young people with lived experience, clinicians, and researchers, for their input. Findings from 46 peer-reviewed research studies are presented alongside views of 64 expert advisors, to identify what is known and what is missing in the literature. Three overarching topics were identified following the review and reflections from advisors: 1) What does it look like? 2) Where does it come from? and 3) How can we change it? The literature identified that young people view themselves more negatively and less positively when depressed, however expert advisors explained that view of self is complex and varies for each individual. Literature identified preliminary evidence of a bidirectional relationship between self-evaluation and depression, however, advisors raised questions regarding the influences and mechanisms involved, such as being influenced by the social environment, and by the cognitive capacity of the individual. Finally, there was a consensus from the literature and expert advisors that self-evaluation can improve across treatment. However, research literature was limited, with only 11 identified studies covering a diverse range of interventions and self-evaluation measures. Various barriers and facilitators to working on self-evaluation in treatment were highlighted by advisors, as well as suggestions for treatment approaches. Findings indicate the importance of self-evaluation in adolescent depression, but highlight the need for more research on which treatments and treatment components are most effective in changing self-evaluation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Negative self-perceptions is one of the most common symptoms of depression in young people, and has been found to be strongly associated with severity of depression symptoms. Psychological treatments for adolescent depression are only moderately effective. Understanding the role and importance of these self-perceptions may help to inform and improve treatments. The aim of this review was to examine self-evaluation as a characteristic of adolescent depression, and as an active ingredient in treatment for adolescent depression.
METHODS
We conducted a scoping review which included quantitative and qualitative studies of any design that reported on self-evaluation as a characteristic of, or focus of treatment for, adolescent depression. Participants were required to be 11-24 years and experiencing elevated symptoms of depression or a diagnosis. We also met with 14 expert advisory groups of young people with lived experience, clinicians, and researchers, for their input. Findings from 46 peer-reviewed research studies are presented alongside views of 64 expert advisors, to identify what is known and what is missing in the literature.
RESULTS
Three overarching topics were identified following the review and reflections from advisors: 1) What does it look like? 2) Where does it come from? and 3) How can we change it? The literature identified that young people view themselves more negatively and less positively when depressed, however expert advisors explained that view of self is complex and varies for each individual. Literature identified preliminary evidence of a bidirectional relationship between self-evaluation and depression, however, advisors raised questions regarding the influences and mechanisms involved, such as being influenced by the social environment, and by the cognitive capacity of the individual. Finally, there was a consensus from the literature and expert advisors that self-evaluation can improve across treatment. However, research literature was limited, with only 11 identified studies covering a diverse range of interventions and self-evaluation measures. Various barriers and facilitators to working on self-evaluation in treatment were highlighted by advisors, as well as suggestions for treatment approaches.
CONCLUSIONS
Findings indicate the importance of self-evaluation in adolescent depression, but highlight the need for more research on which treatments and treatment components are most effective in changing self-evaluation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34861833
doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03585-5
pii: 10.1186/s12888-021-03585-5
pmc: PMC8641228
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
603Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(1):7-20
pubmed: 19432384
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):345-65
pubmed: 25649325
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):45-63
pubmed: 31004739
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993 Nov;32(6):1172-7
pubmed: 8282661
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991 Jan;30(1):79-85
pubmed: 2005068
J Affect Disord. 2018 Nov;240:121-129
pubmed: 30064077
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2322-7
pubmed: 26378840
BMJ. 2015 Sep 16;351:h4320
pubmed: 26376805
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jun;19:87-97
pubmed: 26943454
J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 Aug;109(3):504-11
pubmed: 11016119
Br J Clin Psychol. 2018 Nov;57(4):420-435
pubmed: 29799126
Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Fall;21(4):1155-80
pubmed: 19825262
Int J Pediatr. 2018 Nov 8;2018:1396216
pubmed: 30532790
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;32(4):745-52
pubmed: 8340294
Health Psychol. 2005 Nov;24(6):586-93
pubmed: 16287404
Lancet. 2012 Mar 17;379(9820):1056-67
pubmed: 22305766
Compr Psychiatry. 1999 Nov-Dec;40(6):422-8
pubmed: 10579373
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;191:335-42
pubmed: 17906244
Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Aug;25(3):587-98
pubmed: 23880378
Dev Psychopathol. 2017 Aug;29(3):1057-1073
pubmed: 27760585
Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;58(3):260-273
pubmed: 30556150
J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 1;262:143-148
pubmed: 31733458
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2003 Apr;73(2):212-22
pubmed: 12769242
Dev Psychol. 2014 Jan;50(1):247-57
pubmed: 23566082
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1993 Nov;34(8):1399-407
pubmed: 8294526
Psychol Health Med. 2014;19(2):136-45
pubmed: 23651450
J Affect Disord. 1997 Feb;42(2-3):187-97
pubmed: 9105960
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):329-39
pubmed: 19115452
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2009 May;37(3):267-91
pubmed: 19368751
J Affect Disord. 1997 Sep;45(3):127-34
pubmed: 9298425
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;59(3):225-31
pubmed: 11879160
Int J Eat Disord. 2005 Jul;38(1):60-4
pubmed: 15971249
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Nov;12(11):441-6
pubmed: 18805040
J Adolesc. 2004 Dec;27(6):677-89
pubmed: 15561310
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):233-45
pubmed: 25643205
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1990 Jun;18(3):255-70
pubmed: 2376653
Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;188:216-22
pubmed: 16507961
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1985 Nov;26(6):917-27
pubmed: 4066816
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2008 Jul;14(3):234-45
pubmed: 18624588
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2017 May;22(2):61-68
pubmed: 32680323
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1988 Feb;16(1):111-26
pubmed: 3361027
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):209
pubmed: 31272419
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;3(5):400-24
pubmed: 26158958
J Affect Disord. 2019 Dec 1;259:413-423
pubmed: 31610998
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;35(10):1338-43
pubmed: 8885588
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):223-228
pubmed: 30169257
Exp Aging Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;35(1):20-44
pubmed: 19173100
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(12):1-94
pubmed: 28394249
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;40(6):959-68
pubmed: 10509890
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011 May-Jun;17(3):226-36
pubmed: 21653495
Psychiatry Res. 2018 May;263:61-68
pubmed: 29502039
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Mar-Apr;47(3-4):372-94
pubmed: 16492264
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2016 May 16;3:2333393616649548
pubmed: 28462338
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 Dec 24;15:450
pubmed: 26702639