Real-world use of mycophenolate mofetil in inflammatory bowel disease: Results from the ENEIDA registry.
Crohn's disease
Inflammatory bowel disease
Mycophenolate mofetil
Ulcerative colitis
Journal
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver
ISSN: 1878-3562
Titre abrégé: Dig Liver Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100958385
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
11
05
2021
revised:
22
09
2021
accepted:
07
10
2021
pubmed:
5
12
2021
medline:
3
5
2022
entrez:
4
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Studies to evaluate the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited after the appearance of biological treatments. Our primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of MMF in IBD. IBD patients who had received MMF were retrieved from the ENEIDA registry. Clinical activity as per the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI), partial Mayo score (pMS), physician global assessment (PGA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were reviewed at baseline, at 3 and 6 months, and at final follow-up. Adverse events and causes of treatment discontinuation were documented. A total of 83 patients were included (66 Crohn's disease, 17 ulcerative colitis), 90% of whom had previously received other immunosuppressants. In 61% of patients systemic steroids were used at initiation of MMF, and in 27.3% biological agents were co-administered with MMF. Overall clinical effectiveness was observed in 64.7% of the population. At the end of treatment, 45.6% and 19.1% of subjects showed remission and clinical response, respectively. MMF treatment was maintained for a median of 28.9 months (IQR: 20.4-37.5). Our study suggests, in the largest cohort to date, that MMF may be an effective alternative to thiopurines and methotrexate in IBD.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Studies to evaluate the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited after the appearance of biological treatments.
AIMS
Our primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of MMF in IBD.
METHODS
IBD patients who had received MMF were retrieved from the ENEIDA registry. Clinical activity as per the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI), partial Mayo score (pMS), physician global assessment (PGA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were reviewed at baseline, at 3 and 6 months, and at final follow-up. Adverse events and causes of treatment discontinuation were documented.
RESULTS
A total of 83 patients were included (66 Crohn's disease, 17 ulcerative colitis), 90% of whom had previously received other immunosuppressants. In 61% of patients systemic steroids were used at initiation of MMF, and in 27.3% biological agents were co-administered with MMF. Overall clinical effectiveness was observed in 64.7% of the population. At the end of treatment, 45.6% and 19.1% of subjects showed remission and clinical response, respectively. MMF treatment was maintained for a median of 28.9 months (IQR: 20.4-37.5).
CONCLUSION
Our study suggests, in the largest cohort to date, that MMF may be an effective alternative to thiopurines and methotrexate in IBD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34862115
pii: S1590-8658(21)00807-0
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.10.002
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Mycophenolic Acid
HU9DX48N0T
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
635-641Investigateurs
O Merino
(O)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.