Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Combination with Acalabrutinib in Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Phase 2 Proof-of-Concept Study.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Benzamides
/ therapeutic use
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Humans
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
Proteomics
Pyrazines
/ therapeutic use
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
/ drug therapy
Journal
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2022
01 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
12
07
2021
revised:
12
10
2021
accepted:
30
11
2021
pubmed:
5
12
2021
medline:
16
4
2022
entrez:
4
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor inhibitors have shown efficacy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but treatment failure or secondary resistance occurs in most patients. In preclinical murine carcinoma models, inhibition of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) induces myeloid cell reprogramming that subsequently bolsters CD8+ T cell responses, resulting in enhanced antitumor activity. This phase 2, multicenter, open-label, randomized study evaluated pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) plus acalabrutinib (BTK inhibitor) in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks, alone or in combination with acalabrutinib 100 mg orally twice daily. Safety and overall response rate (ORR) were co-primary objectives. The secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Seventy-six patients were evaluated (pembrolizumab, n = 39; pembrolizumab + acalabrutinib, n = 37). Higher frequencies of grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AE; 65% vs. 39%) and serious AEs (68% vs. 31%) were observed with combination therapy versus monotherapy. ORR was 18% with monotherapy versus 14% with combination therapy. Median PFS was 2.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-6.8] months in the combination arm and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.4-4.0) months in the monotherapy arm. The study was terminated due to lack of clinical benefit with combination treatment. To assess how tumor immune contexture was affected by therapy in patients with pre- and post-treatment biopsies, spatial proteomic analyses were conducted that revealed a trend toward increased CD45+ leukocyte infiltration of tumors from baseline at day 43 with pembrolizumab (monotherapy, n = 5; combination, n = 2), which appeared to be higher in combination-treated patients; however, definitive conclusions could not be drawn due to limited sample size. Despite lack of clinical efficacy, immune subset analyses suggest that there are additive effects of this combination; however, the associated toxicity limits the feasibility of combination treatment with pembrolizumab and acalabrutinib in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34862248
pii: 1078-0432.CCR-21-2547
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2547
pmc: PMC9311322
mid: NIHMS1822934
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Benzamides
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Pyrazines
0
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
acalabrutinib
I42748ELQW
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
903-914Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R21 HD099367
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA224012
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : R01 DE027325
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA223150
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U2C CA233280
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1U01 CA224012
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA226909
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.
Références
Blood Cancer J. 2018 Nov 5;8(11):100
pubmed: 30397191
Ann Oncol. 2010 Oct;21 Suppl 7:vii252-61
pubmed: 20943624
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2019 Jun;33(2):289-309
pubmed: 30935703
Ann Oncol. 2002 Jul;13(7):995-1006
pubmed: 12176777
Methods Enzymol. 2020;635:1-20
pubmed: 32122539
PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(6):e1003446
pubmed: 23825946
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 10;109(15):5791-6
pubmed: 22454496
Cancer Immunol Res. 2017 Apr;5(4):312-318
pubmed: 28246107
Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan 5;102(1):115-23
pubmed: 19997099
Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 1;75(23):5034-45
pubmed: 26573793
J Immunother Cancer. 2017 Jul 18;5(1):53
pubmed: 28716061
Cancer Discov. 2016 Mar;6(3):270-85
pubmed: 26715645
Cancer Res. 2016 Apr 15;76(8):2125-36
pubmed: 26880800
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Apr 09;7:52
pubmed: 31024913
J Clin Invest. 2017 Aug 1;127(8):3052-3064
pubmed: 28714866
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):24-35
pubmed: 20530316
Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1915-1928
pubmed: 31679945
Liver Int. 2018 Jun;38(6):976-987
pubmed: 29603856
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Feb 20;100(4):261-9
pubmed: 18270337
Cancer Res. 2015 Apr 15;75(8):1675-81
pubmed: 25878147
Neoplasia. 2011 Nov;13(11):1093-100
pubmed: 22131884
Oncogenesis. 2021 Feb 27;10(2):20
pubmed: 33640903
Cell Rep. 2017 Apr 4;19(1):203-217
pubmed: 28380359
Front Oncol. 2020 Feb 28;10:268
pubmed: 32185135