Qualitative Study of Health Care Providers' Uptake of the Project Extension for Community Health Outcomes for Chronic Pain.
Journal
The Journal of continuing education in the health professions
ISSN: 1554-558X
Titre abrégé: J Contin Educ Health Prof
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8805847
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2022
01 04 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
5
12
2021
medline:
26
5
2022
entrez:
4
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is an enormous need for pain education among all health care professions before and after licensure. The study goal was to explore generic and chronic pain-specific factors that influenced uptake of a continuous education program for chronic pain, the Project Extension for Community Health Outcomes (ECHO) CHUM Douleur chronique. The study team conducted 20 semistructured virtual interviews among participants of the program. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and two analysts used a reflexive thematic analysis approach to generate study themes. Five aspects facilitating engagement, continued participation, and uptake of the Project ECHO were identified: rapid access to reliable information, appraising one's knowledge, cultivating meaningful relationships, breaking the silos of learning and practice, and exponential possibilities of treatment orchestrations for a complex condition with no cure. Although participants' experiences of the program was positive overall, some obstacles to engagement and continued participation were identified: heterogeneity of participants' profiles, feelings of powerlessness and discouragement in the face of complex incurable pain conditions, challenges in applying recommendations, medical hierarchy, and missed opportunity for advocacy. Many disease-specific and contextual factors contributed to an increased motivation to participate in the ECHO program. Some elements, such as the complexity of diagnosis and treatment, and the multidisciplinary requirements to manage cases were identified as elements motivating one's participation in the program but also acting as a barrier to knowledge uptake. These must be understood in the broader systemic challenges of the current health care system and lack of resources to access allied health care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34862333
doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000409
pii: 00005141-202204220-00006
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
97-104Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Association for Hospital Medical Education, and the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
M.G. Pagé received honoraria from Canopy Growth for work unrelated to this article. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Choiniere M, Dion D, Peng P, et al. The Canadian STOP-PAIN project - Part 1: who are the patients on the waitlists of multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities? Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:539–548.
Sessle B. Unrelieved pain: a crisis. Pain Res Manag. 2011;16(6):416–420.
Campbell F, Hudspith M, Choinière M, et al. Working Together to Better Understand, Prevent, and Manage Chronic Pain: What We Heard. 2020. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/documents/corporate/about-health-canada/public-engagement/external-advisory-bodies/canadian-pain-task-force/report-2020-rapport/report-2020.pdf . Accessed December 1, 2020.
Lalonde L, Leroux-Lapointe V, Choiniere M, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about chronic noncancer pain in primary care: a Canadian survey of physicians and pharmacists. Pain Res Manag. 2014;19:241–250.
Watt-Watson J, McGillion M, Hunter J, et al. A survey of prelicensure pain curricula in health science faculties in Canadian universities. Pain Res Manage. 2009;14:439–444.
Campbell F, Hudspith M, Anderson M, et al. Chronic pain in Canada: laying a foundation for action. Canadian Pain Taskforce Health 2019;1:50.
National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine (NASEM). The role of nonpharmacological approaches to pain management. Proc Workshop. 2019:1–38.
Thompson K, Johnson MI, Milligan J, et al. Twenty-five years of pain education research-what have we learned? Findings from a comprehensive scoping review of research into pre-registration pain education for health professionals. Pain. 2018;159:2146–2158.
Wideman TH, Miller J, Bostick G, et al. The current state of pain education within Canadian physiotherapy programs: a national survey of pain educators. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42:1332–1338.
Arora S, Kalishman S, Dion D, et al. Partnering urban Academic medical centers and rural primary care clinicians to provide complex chronic disease care. Health Aff. 2011;30:1176–1184.
Arora S, Thornton K, Murata G, et al. Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers. NEJM. 2011;364:2199–2207.
Arora S, Geppert CM, Kalishman S, et al. Academic health center management of chronic diseases through knowledge networks: project ECHO. Acad Med. 2007;82:154–160.
Arora S, Kalishman S, Thornton K, et al. Project ECHO (project extension for community Healthcare outcomes): a national and global model for continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016;36(suppl 1):S48–S49.
Arora S, Thornton K, Jenkusky SM, et al. Project ECHO: linking university specialists with rural and prison-based clinicians to improve care for people with chronic hepatitis C in New Mexico. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(suppl 2):74–77.
Katzman JG, Comerci G Jr, Boyle JF, et al. Innovative telementoring for pain management: project ECHO pain. J Contin Educ Health Prof Winter 2014;34:68–75.
ECHO P. ECHO Hubs and Superhubs: Global. 2020. Available at: https://hsc.unm.edu/echo/data-marketplace/interactive-dashboards/ . Accessed January 20, 2021.
Zhou C, Crawford A, Serhal E, et al. The impact of project ECHO on participant and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2016;91:1439–1461.
McBain RK, Sousa JL, Rose AJ, et al. Impact of project ECHO models of medical tele-education: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:2842–2857.
Holmes CM, Keyser-Marcus L, Dave B, et al. Project ECHO and opioid education: a systematic review. Curr Treat Opin Psychiatry. 2020;7:1–14.
Anderson D, Zlateva I, Davis B, et al. Improving pain care with project ECHO in community health centers. Pain medicine. 2017;18(10):1882–1889.
Eaton LH, Langford DJ, Meins AR, et al. Use of self-management interventions for chronic pain management: a comparison between rural and nonrural residents. Pain. 2018;19:8–13.
Furlan AD, Pajer KA, Gardner W, et al. Project ECHO: building capacity to manage complex conditions in rural, remote and underserved areas. Can J Rural Med. 2019;24:115–120.
Furlan AD, Zhao J, Voth J, et al. Evaluation of an innovative tele-education intervention in chronic pain management for primary care clinicians practicing in underserved areas. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25:484–492.
Ball S, Wilson B, Ober S, et al. SCAN-ECHO for pain management: implementing a regional telementoring training for primary care providers. Pain Med. 2018;19(2):262–268.
Meins AR, Doorenbos AZ, Eaton L, et al. TelePain: a community of practice for pain management. J Pain Relief. 2015;4(2):177–184.
Ball S, Stryczek K, Stevenson L, et al. A qualitative evaluation of the pain management VA-ECHO program using the RE-AIM framework: the participant's perspective. Front Public Health. 2020;8:169.
Carlin L, Zhao J, Dubin R, et al. Project ECHO telementoring intervention for managing chronic pain in primary care: insights from a qualitative study. Pain Med. 2018;19(6):1140–1146.
Moore DE Jr, Green JS, Gallis HA. Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. J Contin Educ Health Prof Winter. 2009;29:1–15.
Projet ECHO CHUM Douleur Chronique. Available at: http://www.ruis.umontreal.ca/le-projet-echo-chum-douleur-chronique . Accessed June 1, 2021.
Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, 3rd ed: Sage Publications; 2013. New York, USA.
O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89:1245–1251.
Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24:120–124.
Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL. Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11:522–537.
Berends L. Using multiple coders to enhance qualitative analysis: the case of interviews with consumers of drug treatment. Addict Res Theor. 2005;13:373–381.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
Braun V, Clarke V. What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2014;9:26152.
Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, et al. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, ed. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore; 2019:843–860.
Clarke V, Braun V. Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: a critical reflection. Counselling Psychotherapy Res. 2018;18:107–110.
Corbin JM, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. New York, NY: SAGE; 2015:456.
Version 12. QSR International Pty Ltd. Burlington, MA; 2018.
Web Application for Managing, Analyzing, and Presenting Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research Daa. 7.0.23 DV. 2016. Available at: www.dedoose.com . Accessed May 27, 2021.
Hassan S, Carlin L, Zhao J, et al. Promoting an interprofessional approach to chronic pain management in primary care using Project ECHO. J Interprof Care. 2020;9:1–4.
Zhao J, Salemohamed N, Stinson J, et al. Health care providers' experiences and perceptions participating in a chronic pain telementoring education program: a qualitative study. Can J Pain. 2020;4:111–121.
Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS). Portrait de l'usage des opioïdes chez les personnes couvertes par le régime public d'assurance médicaments du Québec. 2018:79.
Special Advisory Committee on the Epidemic of Opioid Overdoses. Opioid-related Harms in Canada. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada. 2020. Available at: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/substance-related-harms/opioids . Accessed December 1, 2021.
Moeckli J, Stewart KR, Ono S, et al. Mixed-methods study of uptake of the extension for community health outcomes (ECHO) telemedicine model for rural Veterans with HIV. J Rural Health. 2017;33:323–331.
Society TED. Advocacy ECHO. Available at: https://www.ehlers-danlos.com/eds-echo-advocacy/#1597924848522-32b3195f-7f37 . Accessed March 10, 2021.