A Bayesian Belief Network learning tool integrates multi-scale effects of riparian buffers on stream invertebrates.

Catchment management Forest riparian buffers Learning environment Nature-based solution Restoration Social learning Stakeholders engagement Water resource management

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 14 07 2021
revised: 26 11 2021
accepted: 29 11 2021
pubmed: 6 12 2021
medline: 21 1 2022
entrez: 5 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Riparian forest buffers have multiple benefits for biodiversity and ecosystem services in both freshwater and terrestrial habitats but are rarely implemented in water ecosystem management, partly reflecting the lack of information on the effectiveness of this measure. In this context, social learning is valuable to inform stakeholders of the efficacy of riparian vegetation in mitigating stream degradation. We aim to develop a Bayesian belief network (BBN) model for application as a learning tool to simulate and assess the reach- and segment-scale effects of riparian vegetation properties and land use on instream invertebrates. We surveyed reach-scale riparian conditions, extracted segment-scale riparian and subcatchment land use information from geographic information system data, and collected macroinvertebrate samples from four catchments in Europe (Belgium, Norway, Romania, and Sweden). We modelled the ecological condition based on the Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT) index, a macroinvertebrate-based index widely used in European bioassessment, as a function of different riparian variables using the BBN modelling approach. The results of the model simulations provided insights into the usefulness of riparian vegetation attributes in enhancing the ecological condition, with reach-scale riparian vegetation quality associated with the strongest improvements in ecological status. Specifically, reach-scale buffer vegetation of score 3 (i.e. moderate quality) generally results in the highest probability of a good ASPT score (99-100%). In contrast, a site with a narrow width of riparian trees and a small area of trees with reach-scale buffer vegetation of score 1 (i.e. low quality) predicts a high probability of a bad ASPT score (74%). The strengths of the BBN model are the ease of interpretation, fast simulation, ability to explicitly indicate uncertainty in model outcomes, and interactivity. These merits point to the potential use of the BBN model in workshop activities to stimulate key learning processes that help inform the management of riparian zones.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34864036
pii: S0048-9697(21)07222-3
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152146
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

152146

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Marie Anne Eurie Forio (MAE)

Aquatic Ecology Research Unit, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: marie.forio@ugent.be.

Francis J Burdon (FJ)

Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden; Te Aka Mātuatua - School of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Electronic address: francis.burdon@waikato.ac.nz.

Niels De Troyer (N)

Aquatic Ecology Research Unit, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: niels.detroyer@ugent.be.

Koen Lock (K)

Aquatic Ecology Research Unit, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Felix Witing (F)

Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: felix.witing@ufz.de.

Lotte Baert (L)

Aquatic Ecology Research Unit, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: lotte.baert@ugent.be.

Nancy De Saeyer (N)

Aquatic Ecology Research Unit, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: nancy.desaeyer@ugent.be.

Geta Rîșnoveanu (G)

Department of Systems Ecology and Sustainability, University of Bucharest, 050095 Bucharest, Romania; Research Institute of the University of Bucharest, 050663 Bucharest, Romania. Electronic address: geta.risnoveanu@g.unibuc.ro.

Cristina Popescu (C)

Department of Systems Ecology and Sustainability, University of Bucharest, 050095 Bucharest, Romania. Electronic address: cristina.popescu@g.unibuc.ro.

Benjamin Kupilas (B)

Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), 0349 Oslo, Norway; Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany. Electronic address: benjamin.kupilas@niva.no.

Nikolai Friberg (N)

Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), 0349 Oslo, Norway; Freshwater Biological Section, Department of Biology, Universitetsparken 4, 3rd floor, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; water@leeds, School of Geography, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Electronic address: nikolai.friberg@niva.no.

Pieter Boets (P)

Aquatic Ecology Research Unit, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Provincial Centre of Environmental Research, Godshuizenlaan 95, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: pieter.boets@oost-vlaanderen.be.

Richard K Johnson (RK)

Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.

Martin Volk (M)

Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: martin.volk@ufz.de.

Brendan G McKie (BG)

Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: brendan.mckie@slu.se.

Peter L M Goethals (PLM)

Aquatic Ecology Research Unit, Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: peter.goethals@ugent.be.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH