Lymphovascular invasion has a significant prognostic impact in patients with early breast cancer, results from a large, national, multicenter, retrospective cohort study.


Journal

ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 07 09 2021
revised: 28 10 2021
accepted: 31 10 2021
pubmed: 6 12 2021
medline: 25 3 2022
entrez: 5 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We determined the prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in a large, national, multicenter, retrospective cohort of patients with early breast cancer (BC) according to numerous factors. We collected data on 17 322 early BC patients treated in 13 French cancer centers from 1991 to 2013. Survival functions were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate survival analyses were carried out using the Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for significant variables associated with LVI or not. Two propensity score-based matching approaches were used to balance differences in known prognostic variables associated with LVI status and to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in LVI-positive luminal A-like patients. LVI was present in 24.3% (4205) of patients. LVI was significantly and independently associated with all clinical and pathological characteristics analyzed in the entire population and according to endocrine receptor (ER) status except for the time period in binary logistic regression. According to multivariate analyses including ER status, AC, grade, and tumor subtypes, the presence of LVI was significantly associated with a negative prognostic impact on overall (OS), disease-free (DFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in all patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.345, HR = 1.312, and HR = 1.415, respectively; P < 0.0001], which was also observed in the propensity score-based analysis in addition to the association of AC with a significant increase in both OS and DFS in LVI-positive luminal A-like patients. LVI did not have a significant impact in either patients with ER-positive grade 3 tumors or those with AC-treated luminal A-like tumors. The presence of LVI has an independent negative prognostic impact on OS, DFS, and MFS in early BC patients, except in ER-positive grade 3 tumors and in those with luminal A-like tumors treated with AC. Therefore, LVI may indicate the existence of a subset of luminal A-like patients who may still benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
We determined the prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in a large, national, multicenter, retrospective cohort of patients with early breast cancer (BC) according to numerous factors.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We collected data on 17 322 early BC patients treated in 13 French cancer centers from 1991 to 2013. Survival functions were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate survival analyses were carried out using the Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for significant variables associated with LVI or not. Two propensity score-based matching approaches were used to balance differences in known prognostic variables associated with LVI status and to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in LVI-positive luminal A-like patients.
RESULTS
LVI was present in 24.3% (4205) of patients. LVI was significantly and independently associated with all clinical and pathological characteristics analyzed in the entire population and according to endocrine receptor (ER) status except for the time period in binary logistic regression. According to multivariate analyses including ER status, AC, grade, and tumor subtypes, the presence of LVI was significantly associated with a negative prognostic impact on overall (OS), disease-free (DFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in all patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.345, HR = 1.312, and HR = 1.415, respectively; P < 0.0001], which was also observed in the propensity score-based analysis in addition to the association of AC with a significant increase in both OS and DFS in LVI-positive luminal A-like patients. LVI did not have a significant impact in either patients with ER-positive grade 3 tumors or those with AC-treated luminal A-like tumors.
CONCLUSION
The presence of LVI has an independent negative prognostic impact on OS, DFS, and MFS in early BC patients, except in ER-positive grade 3 tumors and in those with luminal A-like tumors treated with AC. Therefore, LVI may indicate the existence of a subset of luminal A-like patients who may still benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34864349
pii: S2059-7029(21)00278-7
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100316
pmc: PMC8645922
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100316

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

G Houvenaeghel (G)

Department of Surgical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France. Electronic address: houvenaeghelg@ipc.unicancer.fr.

M Cohen (M)

Department of Surgical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France.

J M Classe (JM)

Institut René Gauducheau, Site Hospitalier Nord, St Herblain, France.

F Reyal (F)

Institut Curie, Paris, France.

C Mazouni (C)

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

N Chopin (N)

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

A Martinez (A)

Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.

E Daraï (E)

Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.

C Coutant (C)

Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.

P E Colombo (PE)

Centre Val d'Aurelles, Montpellier, France.

P Gimbergues (P)

Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France.

M P Chauvet (MP)

Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

A S Azuar (AS)

Hôpital de Grasse, Chemin de Clavary, Grasse, France.

R Rouzier (R)

Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.

C Tunon de Lara (C)

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.

X Muracciole (X)

Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France.

A Agostini (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynocology, Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France.

M Bannier (M)

Department of Surgical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France.

E Charaffe Jauffret (E)

Department of Pathology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

A De Nonneville (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France.

A Goncalves (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH