Post Hoc Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Antihyperglycemic Background Therapies on Attainment of A1C Targets Without Hypoglycemia in the ACHIEVE Control Pragmatic, Real-Life Study.
Journal
Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association
ISSN: 1040-9165
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Spectr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8913432
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
entrez:
6
12
2021
pubmed:
7
12
2021
medline:
7
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
ACHIEVE Control, a prospective, open-label, randomized, pragmatic, real-life study in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes (A1C 8.0-11.0%), demonstrated superiority of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) versus first-generation standard-of-care basal insulin (SOC-BI; glargine 100 units/mL or insulin detemir) in achieving individualized A1C targets without documented symptomatic (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL] or <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycemia (American Diabetes Association level 3) at 6 months. Noninsulin antihyperglycemic background therapies are commonly used; however, sulfonylureas may increase hypoglycemia risk. This post hoc analysis assessed outcomes according to background therapy. Subgroup analyses were performed per concomitant use/nonuse of sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, or sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. End points (6 and 12 months) included A1C target attainment without documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia, A1C target attainment, and absence of documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia. Odds ratios (ORs) at 12 months mostly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI across subgroups except in analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors, in which ORs were similar. Among sulfonylurea users, ORs at 12 months strongly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI for all end points, particularly A1C target achievement without documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53) or severe hypoglycemia and achievement of no documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.52) or severe hypoglycemia. The results suggest that, in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes, Gla-300 is effective with a risk of hypoglycemia that is lower than or similar to that of SOC-BI regardless of background medication. Individuals receiving concomitant sulfonylureas were more likely to remain without symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia with Gla-300.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
ACHIEVE Control, a prospective, open-label, randomized, pragmatic, real-life study in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes (A1C 8.0-11.0%), demonstrated superiority of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) versus first-generation standard-of-care basal insulin (SOC-BI; glargine 100 units/mL or insulin detemir) in achieving individualized A1C targets without documented symptomatic (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL] or <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycemia (American Diabetes Association level 3) at 6 months. Noninsulin antihyperglycemic background therapies are commonly used; however, sulfonylureas may increase hypoglycemia risk. This post hoc analysis assessed outcomes according to background therapy.
METHODS
METHODS
Subgroup analyses were performed per concomitant use/nonuse of sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, or sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. End points (6 and 12 months) included A1C target attainment without documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia, A1C target attainment, and absence of documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Odds ratios (ORs) at 12 months mostly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI across subgroups except in analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors, in which ORs were similar. Among sulfonylurea users, ORs at 12 months strongly favored Gla-300 versus SOC-BI for all end points, particularly A1C target achievement without documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53) or severe hypoglycemia and achievement of no documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (glucose <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.52) or severe hypoglycemia.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The results suggest that, in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes, Gla-300 is effective with a risk of hypoglycemia that is lower than or similar to that of SOC-BI regardless of background medication. Individuals receiving concomitant sulfonylureas were more likely to remain without symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia with Gla-300.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34866875
doi: 10.2337/ds20-0079
pii: DS200079
pmc: PMC8603128
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
407-418Informations de copyright
© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association.
Références
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015 Aug;109(2):378-88
pubmed: 26059071
Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701
pubmed: 30291106
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1596-1605
pubmed: 30843339
Diabetes Metab. 2018 Nov;44(5):402-409
pubmed: 29548798
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S98-S110
pubmed: 31862752
Diabetes Care. 2013 May;36(5):1384-95
pubmed: 23589542
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S73-S84
pubmed: 33298417
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Apr;10(2):617-633
pubmed: 30767173
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):1347-1358
pubmed: 29600507
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Sep;14(9):859-64
pubmed: 22594461
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Apr;17(4):386-94
pubmed: 25641260
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun;32(3):431-447
pubmed: 31068410
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Nov;22(11):2004-2012
pubmed: 32729217
Diabetes Metab. 2017 Sep;43(4):351-358
pubmed: 28622950
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Nov;22(11):1995-2003
pubmed: 32538550
BMJ. 2018 Jul 18;362:k2693
pubmed: 30021781
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016 Aug;12(8):977-87
pubmed: 27453980
Am J Med. 2017 Jun;130(6S):S4-S17
pubmed: 28526182
Prim Care Diabetes. 2018 Apr;12(2):155-162
pubmed: 29100717
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016 Oct;12(10):566-92
pubmed: 27339889
Diabetes Care. 2015 Apr;38(4):637-43
pubmed: 25150159
Postgrad Med. 2016 Nov;128(8):731-739
pubmed: 27690710