Identification of drought tolerant Chickpea genotypes through multi trait stability index.
Best Non-Impartial Linear Forecast
Chickpea
Drought
Multi-environment trials
Multi-trait stability index
Journal
Saudi journal of biological sciences
ISSN: 1319-562X
Titre abrégé: Saudi J Biol Sci
Pays: Saudi Arabia
ID NLM: 101543796
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
16
04
2021
revised:
15
07
2021
accepted:
18
07
2021
entrez:
6
12
2021
pubmed:
7
12
2021
medline:
7
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Drought is a major and constantly increasing abiotic stress factor, thus limiting chickpea production. Like other crops, Kabuli Chickpea genotypes are screened for drought stress through Multi-environment trials (METs). Although, METs analysis is generally executed taking into account only one trait, which provides less significant reliability for the recommendation of genotypes as compared to multi trait-based analysis. Multi trait-based analysis could be used to recommend genotypes across diverse environments. Hence, current research was conducted for selection of superior genotypes through multi-trait stability index (MTSI) by using mixed and fixed effect models under six diverse environments. The genotypic stability was computed for all traits individually using the weighted average of absolute scores from the singular value decomposition of the matrix of best linear unbiased predictions for the genotype vs environment interaction (GEI) effects produced by a linear mixed-effect model index. A superiority index, WAASBY was measured to reflect the MPS (Mean performance and stability). The selection differential for the WAASBY index was 11.2%, 18.49% and 23.30% for grain yield (GY), primary branches per plant (PBP) and Stomatal Conductance (STOMA) respectively. Positive selection differential (0.80% ≤ selection differential ≤ 13.00%) were examined for traits averaged desired to be increased and negative (-0.57% ≤ selection differential ≤ -0.23%) for those traits desired to be reduced. The MTSI may be valuable to the plant breeders for the selection of genotypes based on many characters as being strong and simple selection process. Analysis of MTSI for multiple environments revealed that, the genotypes G20, G86, G31, G28, G116, G12, G105, G45, G50, G10, G30, G117, G81, G48, G85, G17, G32, G4, and G37 were the most stable and high yielding out of 120 chickpea genotypes, probably due to high MPS of selected traits under various environments. It is concluded that identified traits can be utilized as genitors in hybridization programs for the development of drought tolerant Kabuli Chickpea breeding material.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34866982
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.056
pii: S1319-562X(21)00639-2
pmc: PMC8626221
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
6818-6828Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005 Apr;16(2):123-32
pubmed: 15831376
Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Jan;31(1):11-38
pubmed: 17971069
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 10;729:139082
pubmed: 32371202
Plants (Basel). 2017 Feb 10;6(1):
pubmed: 28208605
Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7781):109-118
pubmed: 31695205
Funct Plant Biol. 2017 Feb;44(2):219-234
pubmed: 32480559
Science. 2021 Jan 22;371(6527):334-335
pubmed: 33479133
Microbiol Res. 2016 Mar;184:13-24
pubmed: 26856449
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 15;735:139378
pubmed: 32480148
PLoS One. 2014 May 06;9(5):e96758
pubmed: 24801366
J Environ Manage. 2021 Mar 1;281:111881
pubmed: 33401121
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127401
pubmed: 26061704
J Food Sci. 2008 Jun;73(5):C299-305
pubmed: 18576973
Food Sci Nutr. 2021 Jan 28;9(3):1761-1779
pubmed: 33747487
Ann Bot. 2002 Jun;89 Spec No:925-40
pubmed: 12102518
Front Genet. 2020 Dec 14;11:584527
pubmed: 33381148
Physiol Plant. 2021 Jan;171(1):66-76
pubmed: 32880977
Genet Mol Res. 2017 Mar 22;16(1):
pubmed: 28340272
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 22;10(1):18013
pubmed: 33093541
Plants (Basel). 2021 Feb 04;10(2):
pubmed: 33557079
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 15;11:607869
pubmed: 33679816
PeerJ. 2021 Jun 14;9:e11592
pubmed: 34178464
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Feb 25;10:1759
pubmed: 32161601
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):171
pubmed: 32303179