Are There Any Ethnic Differences in the Response to Baricitinib for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis?
baricitinib
drug response
ethnicity
jak inhibitors
rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
accepted:
29
11
2021
entrez:
7
12
2021
pubmed:
8
12
2021
medline:
8
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction Baricitinib is an oral synthetic Janus Kinase inhibitor that inhibits JAK1 and JAK2, and the new kid on the block in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To date, there are no studies comparing the clinical benefit of baricitinib in RA between different ethnicities. Ethnicity plays a role in the effectiveness of therapeutic agents. Given the large multi-ethnic population of Leicestershire in the United Kingdom and the range of new therapeutics in RA, we reviewed our cohort of patients with RA to see whether there is any difference in baricitinib Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) response between the Asian and White cohorts. Methods This was a retrospective study. The patients included were those under the care of rheumatology at University Hospitals of Leicester (UHL) with a diagnosis of RA and either receiving baricitinib or had received it in the past. Data was collected using the UHL information technology systems, clinic letters and pharmacy records. In addition to ethnicity, we reviewed patient age, gender, concurrent disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) used, previous biologics used, baseline and post-treatment DAS28, dropout from therapy, baseline biochemical assays (anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) and rheumatoid factor (RF) status) and radiographic findings. An independent t-test was used to compare continuous data, and Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare categorical data. Results A total of 120 patients were included in the analysis, and data were analysed with Portable Format for Analytics (PFA). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean DAS28 at baseline (Asian: 5.17 versus White: 4.65; p-value = 0.107) and post-treatment (Asian: 2.8 versus White: 3.3; p-value = 0.404). Comparing both ethnicities, there was no statistically significant difference in previous biologics used, anti-CCP and RF titres, and radiographic findings of erosions. Conclusion This is the first study of its kind, and it found no significant difference in baricitinib response between the Asian and White cohorts. Our study had certain limitations, and future studies will be needed to evaluate this subject further. Such data is important as it can contribute to a body of evidence that may in the future help inform clinical decision-making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34873553
doi: 10.7759/cureus.20024
pmc: PMC8636192
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e20024Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021, Zahir Hussain et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Rheumatol. 2005 Dec;32(12):2317-25
pubmed: 16331756
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jan 4;23(1):3
pubmed: 33397481
J Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;35(4):550-2
pubmed: 18398948
J Rheumatol. 2005 Apr;32(4):602-8
pubmed: 15801013
J Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;46(1):7-18
pubmed: 30219772
J Rheumatol. 2007 Jul;34(7):1480-4
pubmed: 17552044
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Feb;50(2):400-12
pubmed: 14872482
Autoimmun Rev. 2010 May;9(7):507-10
pubmed: 20146942
Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Jan;27(1):97-100
pubmed: 17932617
Biologicals. 2018 Jul;54:28-32
pubmed: 29753590
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Apr;65(4):666
pubmed: 23212944
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):652-662
pubmed: 28199814
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Apr;45(5):519-32
pubmed: 26607440
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 May;49(5):1005-12
pubmed: 20189950
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2021 Mar 1;33(2):117-121
pubmed: 33394602
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Oct;42(10):1197-201
pubmed: 12810940
J Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;36(3):539-45
pubmed: 19208607
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed). 2020 Jun 3;:
pubmed: 32505641
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;69(3):506-517
pubmed: 27723271
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1955-1957
pubmed: 32539937
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr 15;49(2):200-8
pubmed: 12687511