Implementation of automatic plan optimization in Italy: Status and perspectives.

Automated radiotherapy treatment planning Survey

Journal

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)
ISSN: 1724-191X
Titre abrégé: Phys Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9302888

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 01 09 2021
revised: 20 11 2021
accepted: 24 11 2021
pubmed: 8 12 2021
medline: 8 12 2021
entrez: 7 12 2021
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To investigate and report on the diffusion and clinical use of automated radiotherapy planning systems in Italy and to assess the perspectives of the community of Italian medical physicists involved in radiotherapy on the use of these tools. A survey of medical physicists (one per Institute) of 175 radiotherapy centers in Italy was conducted between February 21st and April 1st, 2021. The information collected included the institute's characteristics, plan activity, availability/use of automatic tools and related issues regarding satisfaction, criticisms, expectations, and perceived professional modifications. Responses were analysed, including the impact of a few variables such as the institute type and experience. 125 of the centers (71%) answered the survey, with regional variability (range: 47%-100%); among these, 49% have a TPS with some automatic option. Clinical use of automatic planning is present in 33% of the centers, with 13% applying it in >50% of their plans. Among the 125 responding centres the most used systems are Pinnacle (16%), Raystation (9%) and Eclipse (4%). The majority of participants consider the use of automated techniques to be beneficial, while only 1% do not see any advantage; 83% of respondents see the possibility of enriching their professional role as a potential benefit, while 3% see potential threats. Our survey shows that 49% of the responding centres have an automatic planning solution although clinically used in only 33% of the cases. Most physicists consider the use of automated techniques to be beneficial and show a prevalently positive attitude.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34875426
pii: S1120-1797(21)00351-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.11.013
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

86-94

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Stefania Pallotta (S)

University of Florence, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Florence, Italy; Medical Physics Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy. Electronic address: stefania.pallotta@unifi.it.

Livia Marrazzo (L)

Medical Physics Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.

Silvia Calusi (S)

University of Florence, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Florence, Italy.

Roberta Castriconi (R)

Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.

Claudio Fiorino (C)

Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.

Gianfranco Loi (G)

Medical Physics, AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.

Christian Fiandra (C)

University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Turin, Italy.

Classifications MeSH