Civilian-military malaria outbreak response in Thailand: an example of multi-stakeholder engagement for malaria elimination.
Disease Eradication
/ organization & administration
Disease Outbreaks
Malaria, Falciparum
/ epidemiology
Malaria, Vivax
/ epidemiology
Military Personnel
/ statistics & numerical data
Plasmodium falciparum
/ isolation & purification
Plasmodium vivax
/ isolation & purification
Prevalence
Risk Factors
Stakeholder Participation
Thailand
/ epidemiology
Civilian
Civilian-military cooperation
Greater Mekong Subregion
Malaria
Malaria elimination
Malaria outbreak investigation
Military
Southeast Asia
Thailand
Journal
Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Dec 2021
07 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
08
09
2021
accepted:
25
11
2021
entrez:
8
12
2021
pubmed:
9
12
2021
medline:
24
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In April 2017, the Thai Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) was alerted to a potential malaria outbreak among civilians and military personnel in Sisaket Province, a highly forested area bordering Cambodia. The objective of this study was to present findings from the joint civilian-military outbreak response. A mixed-methods approach was used to assess risk factors among cases reported during the 2017 Sisaket malaria outbreak. Routine malaria surveillance data from January 2013 to March 2018 obtained from public and military medical reporting systems and key informant interviews (KIIs) (n = 72) were used to develop hypotheses about potential factors contributing to the outbreak. Joint civilian-military response activities included entomological surveys, mass screen and treat (MSAT) and vector control campaigns, and scale-up of the "1-3-7" reactive case detection approach among civilians alongside a pilot "1-3-7" study conducted by the Royal Thai Army (RTA). Between May-July 2017, the monthly number of MoPH-reported cases surpassed the epidemic threshold. Outbreak cases detected through the MoPH mainly consisted of Thai males (87%), working as rubber tappers (62%) or military/border police (15%), and Plasmodium vivax infections (73%). Compared to cases from the previous year (May-July 2016), outbreak cases were more likely to be rubber tappers (OR = 14.89 [95% CI: 5.79-38.29]; p < 0.001) and infected with P. vivax (OR=2.32 [1.27-4.22]; p = 0.006). Themes from KIIs were congruent with findings from routine surveillance data. Though limited risk factor information was available from military cases, findings from RTA's "1-3-7" study indicated transmission was likely occurring outside military bases. Data from entomological surveys and MSAT campaigns support this hypothesis, as vectors were mostly exophagic and parasite prevalence from MSAT campaigns was very low (range: 0-0.7% by PCR/microscopy). In 2017, an outbreak of mainly P. vivax occurred in Sisaket Province, affecting mainly military and rubber tappers. Vector control use was limited to the home/military barracks, indicating that additional interventions were needed during high-risk forest travel periods. Importantly, this outbreak catalyzed joint civilian-military collaborations and integration of the RTA into the national malaria elimination strategy (NMES). The Sisaket outbreak response serves as an example of how civilian and military public health systems can collaborate to advance national malaria elimination goals in Southeast Asia and beyond.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In April 2017, the Thai Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) was alerted to a potential malaria outbreak among civilians and military personnel in Sisaket Province, a highly forested area bordering Cambodia. The objective of this study was to present findings from the joint civilian-military outbreak response.
METHODS
METHODS
A mixed-methods approach was used to assess risk factors among cases reported during the 2017 Sisaket malaria outbreak. Routine malaria surveillance data from January 2013 to March 2018 obtained from public and military medical reporting systems and key informant interviews (KIIs) (n = 72) were used to develop hypotheses about potential factors contributing to the outbreak. Joint civilian-military response activities included entomological surveys, mass screen and treat (MSAT) and vector control campaigns, and scale-up of the "1-3-7" reactive case detection approach among civilians alongside a pilot "1-3-7" study conducted by the Royal Thai Army (RTA).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Between May-July 2017, the monthly number of MoPH-reported cases surpassed the epidemic threshold. Outbreak cases detected through the MoPH mainly consisted of Thai males (87%), working as rubber tappers (62%) or military/border police (15%), and Plasmodium vivax infections (73%). Compared to cases from the previous year (May-July 2016), outbreak cases were more likely to be rubber tappers (OR = 14.89 [95% CI: 5.79-38.29]; p < 0.001) and infected with P. vivax (OR=2.32 [1.27-4.22]; p = 0.006). Themes from KIIs were congruent with findings from routine surveillance data. Though limited risk factor information was available from military cases, findings from RTA's "1-3-7" study indicated transmission was likely occurring outside military bases. Data from entomological surveys and MSAT campaigns support this hypothesis, as vectors were mostly exophagic and parasite prevalence from MSAT campaigns was very low (range: 0-0.7% by PCR/microscopy).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In 2017, an outbreak of mainly P. vivax occurred in Sisaket Province, affecting mainly military and rubber tappers. Vector control use was limited to the home/military barracks, indicating that additional interventions were needed during high-risk forest travel periods. Importantly, this outbreak catalyzed joint civilian-military collaborations and integration of the RTA into the national malaria elimination strategy (NMES). The Sisaket outbreak response serves as an example of how civilian and military public health systems can collaborate to advance national malaria elimination goals in Southeast Asia and beyond.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34876133
doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03995-6
pii: 10.1186/s12936-021-03995-6
pmc: PMC8650387
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
458Subventions
Organisme : U.S. Department of Defense
ID : U.S. Department of Defense
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS Med. 2013;10(6):e1001467
pubmed: 23853551
PLoS Med. 2014 May 13;11(5):e1001642
pubmed: 24824170
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 28;11(1):13419
pubmed: 34183715
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 5;14(10):e1002401
pubmed: 28981506
J Health Popul Nutr. 2009 Feb;27(1):4-13
pubmed: 19248643
Parasit Vectors. 2012 Feb 15;5:39
pubmed: 22336191
Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 Apr 25;6(1):81
pubmed: 28438218
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 May;17(5):491-497
pubmed: 28161569
Trends Parasitol. 2019 Jun;35(6):388-398
pubmed: 31076353
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 30;5:17412
pubmed: 26616851
Trends Parasitol. 2014 Dec;30(12):571-81
pubmed: 25455566
Malar J. 2017 Jul 25;16(1):299
pubmed: 28743278
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Sep 1;6(3):e15409
pubmed: 32663141
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;19(9):952-961
pubmed: 31345710
Malar J. 2019 Jul 1;18(1):221
pubmed: 31262309
Parasitol Res. 2017 Dec;116(12):3349-3359
pubmed: 29082435
Malar J. 2021 Feb 27;20(1):118
pubmed: 33639951
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;17(12):1233
pubmed: 29173875
Malar J. 2010 Sep 16;9:259
pubmed: 20846447
Epidemiol Rev. 1994;16(1):109-23
pubmed: 7925720
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2006;37 Suppl 2:1-128
pubmed: 17262930
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(2):296-298
pubmed: 29020325
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:363417
pubmed: 23865048
Acta Trop. 2012 Mar;121(3):227-39
pubmed: 21382335
Malar J. 2021 Feb 22;20(1):108
pubmed: 33618718