Living systematic reviews in rehabilitation science can improve evidence-based healthcare.
Chronic pain
Living systematic review
Meta-analysis
Methods
Rehabilitation
Systematic review
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 12 2021
07 12 2021
Historique:
received:
10
04
2021
accepted:
17
11
2021
entrez:
8
12
2021
pubmed:
9
12
2021
medline:
3
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although systematic reviews are considered as central components in evidence-based practice, they currently face an important challenge to keep up with the exponential publication rate of clinical trials. After initial publication, only a minority of the systematic reviews are updated, and it often takes multiple years before these results become accessible. Consequently, many systematic reviews are not up to date, thereby increasing the time-gap between research findings and clinical practice. A potential solution is offered by a living systematic reviews approach. These types of studies are characterized by a workflow of continuous updates which decreases the time it takes to disseminate new findings. Although living systematic reviews are specifically designed to continuously synthesize new evidence in rapidly emerging topics, they have also considerable potential in slower developing domains, such as rehabilitation science. In this commentary, we outline the rationale and required steps to transition a regular systematic review into a living systematic review. We also propose a workflow that is designed for rehabilitation science.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34876231
doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01857-5
pii: 10.1186/s13643-021-01857-5
pmc: PMC8650945
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
309Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 14;8(1):325
pubmed: 31837703
BMJ. 2020 Sep 15;370:m2864
pubmed: 32933948
Pain. 2013 May;154(5):643-646
pubmed: 23541132
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Apr;107(2):210-221
pubmed: 31019390
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Jun;55(3):395-410
pubmed: 30938138
AACN Clin Issues. 2001 Nov;12(4):529-38
pubmed: 11759425
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3
pubmed: 27366130
F1000Res. 2020 Mar 25;9:210
pubmed: 32724560
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 18;8(11):e022920
pubmed: 30455387
Med Image Anal. 2017 Jan;35:1-17
pubmed: 27294558
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:143-152
pubmed: 32145369
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:38-46
pubmed: 28912004
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:23-30
pubmed: 28912002
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):699-704
pubmed: 19788953
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210
pubmed: 27919275
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 17;7(1):195
pubmed: 30447694
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jul;58(7):741-2
pubmed: 15939227
BMJ. 2009 Oct 19;339:b4012
pubmed: 19841007
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;63(3):289-98
pubmed: 19683413
PLoS Med. 2010 Sep 21;7(9):e1000326
pubmed: 20877712
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:31-37
pubmed: 28912003
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Mar;99(3):210-215
pubmed: 31851008
Pain. 2013 Oct;154(10):1929-1931
pubmed: 23742793
Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 20;2:76
pubmed: 24050381
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:135-142
pubmed: 32145367
F1000Res. 2018 Feb 15;7:196
pubmed: 30631437
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Aug 21;147(4):224-33
pubmed: 17638714
Eur J Pain. 2021 Oct 8;:
pubmed: 34624159
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Aug 30;13:106
pubmed: 24004523
Res Synth Methods. 2020 May;11(3):471-483
pubmed: 32281271
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 30;9(9):e032353
pubmed: 31575583