Harnessing technology to enable all women mobility in labour and birth: feasibility of implementing beltless non-invasive fetal ECG applying the NASSS framework.
Fetal monitoring
Freedom of movement
Intrapartum
Labour and birth
Midwifery
NASSS
Non-invasive fetal ECG (NIFECG)
Obstetrics
Transabdominal fetal monitor
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Dec 2021
07 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
26
03
2021
accepted:
26
11
2021
entrez:
8
12
2021
pubmed:
9
12
2021
medline:
9
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A new wireless and beltless monitoring device utilising fetal and maternal electrocardiography (ECG) and uterine electromyography, known as 'non-invasive fetal ECG' (NIFECG) was registered for clinical use in Australia in 2018. The safety and reliability of NIFECG has been demonstrated in controlled settings for short periods during labour. As far as we are aware, at the time our study commenced, this was globally the first trial of such a device in an authentic clinical setting for the entire duration of a woman's labour. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of using NIFECG fetal monitoring for women undergoing continuous electronic fetal monitoring during labour and birth. Women were eligible to participate in the study if they were at 36 weeks gestation or greater with a singleton pregnancy, planning to give birth vaginally and with obstetric indications as per local protocol (NSW Health Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Guideline GL2018_025. 2018) for continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring. Written informed consent was received from participating women in antenatal clinic prior to the onset of labour. This single site clinical feasibility study took place between January and July 2020 at the Royal Hospital for Women in Sydney, Australia. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected to inform the analysis of results using the NASSS (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale up, Spread and Sustainability) framework, a validated tool for analysing the implementation of new health technologies into clinical settings. Women responded positively about the comfort and freedom of movement afforded by the NIFECG. Midwives reported that when no loss of contact occurred, the device enabled them to focus less on the technology and more on supporting women's physical and emotional needs during labour. Midwives and obstetricians noticed the benefits for women but expressed a need for greater certainty about the reliability of the signal. The NIFECG device enables freedom of movement and positioning for labouring women and was well received by women and the majority of clinicians. Whilst measurement of the uterine activity was reliable, there was uncertainty for clinicians in relation to loss of contact of the fetal heart rate. If this can be ameliorated the device shows potential to be used as routinely as cardiotocography (CTG) for fetal monitoring. This is the first time the NASSS framework has been used to synthesise the implementation needs of a health technology in the care of women during labour and birth. Our findings contribute new knowledge about the determinants for implementation of a complex technology in a maternity care setting. The Universal Trial Number is reU1111-1228-9845 and the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registration Number is 12619000293167p. Trial registration occurred on the 20 February, 2019. The trial protocol may be viewed at http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377027.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A new wireless and beltless monitoring device utilising fetal and maternal electrocardiography (ECG) and uterine electromyography, known as 'non-invasive fetal ECG' (NIFECG) was registered for clinical use in Australia in 2018. The safety and reliability of NIFECG has been demonstrated in controlled settings for short periods during labour. As far as we are aware, at the time our study commenced, this was globally the first trial of such a device in an authentic clinical setting for the entire duration of a woman's labour.
METHODS
METHODS
This study aimed to assess the feasibility of using NIFECG fetal monitoring for women undergoing continuous electronic fetal monitoring during labour and birth. Women were eligible to participate in the study if they were at 36 weeks gestation or greater with a singleton pregnancy, planning to give birth vaginally and with obstetric indications as per local protocol (NSW Health Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Guideline GL2018_025. 2018) for continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring. Written informed consent was received from participating women in antenatal clinic prior to the onset of labour. This single site clinical feasibility study took place between January and July 2020 at the Royal Hospital for Women in Sydney, Australia. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected to inform the analysis of results using the NASSS (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale up, Spread and Sustainability) framework, a validated tool for analysing the implementation of new health technologies into clinical settings.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Women responded positively about the comfort and freedom of movement afforded by the NIFECG. Midwives reported that when no loss of contact occurred, the device enabled them to focus less on the technology and more on supporting women's physical and emotional needs during labour. Midwives and obstetricians noticed the benefits for women but expressed a need for greater certainty about the reliability of the signal.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The NIFECG device enables freedom of movement and positioning for labouring women and was well received by women and the majority of clinicians. Whilst measurement of the uterine activity was reliable, there was uncertainty for clinicians in relation to loss of contact of the fetal heart rate. If this can be ameliorated the device shows potential to be used as routinely as cardiotocography (CTG) for fetal monitoring. This is the first time the NASSS framework has been used to synthesise the implementation needs of a health technology in the care of women during labour and birth. Our findings contribute new knowledge about the determinants for implementation of a complex technology in a maternity care setting.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
The Universal Trial Number is reU1111-1228-9845 and the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registration Number is 12619000293167p. Trial registration occurred on the 20 February, 2019. The trial protocol may be viewed at http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377027.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34876233
doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00953-6
pii: 10.1186/s40814-021-00953-6
pmc: PMC8650358
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
214Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 03;2:CD006066
pubmed: 28157275
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 12;18(1):370
pubmed: 30208861
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;8(10):e020347
pubmed: 30341110
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Jan;23(1):17-22
pubmed: 19672790
Midwifery. 2021 Feb;93:102887
pubmed: 33260005
BMC Med. 2018 May 14;16(1):66
pubmed: 29754584
Women Birth. 2012 Sep;25(3):100-6
pubmed: 21664208
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;131(1):13-24
pubmed: 26433401
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357
pubmed: 30322585
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 09;(10):CD003934
pubmed: 24105444
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Aug;215:197-205
pubmed: 28649034
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Aug;25(8):1517-20
pubmed: 22070793
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jun;93(6):590-5
pubmed: 24684703
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;75(2):101-8
pubmed: 23328351
J Pregnancy. 2017;2017:8529816
pubmed: 28392944
J Perinat Educ. 2005 Winter;14(1):9-21
pubmed: 17273417
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Nov;286(5):1103-7
pubmed: 22714064
PLoS One. 2018 May 17;13(5):e0197791
pubmed: 29772012
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;206(5):412.e1-5
pubmed: 22284960
Birth. 2018 Sep;45(3):222-231
pubmed: 29926965
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Nov;91(11):1306-13
pubmed: 22924738
Midwifery. 2018 Feb;57:18-25
pubmed: 29144977
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):230
pubmed: 31277600
J Nurse Midwifery. 1997 Jan-Feb;42(1):4-8
pubmed: 9037929