Arthroplasty

Arthroplasty Elderly Intertrochanteric femoral fracture Meta-analysis Proximal femoral nail Systematic review

Journal

World journal of clinical cases
ISSN: 2307-8960
Titre abrégé: World J Clin Cases
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101618806

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Nov 2021
Historique:
received: 18 06 2021
revised: 27 08 2021
accepted: 19 09 2021
entrez: 8 12 2021
pubmed: 9 12 2021
medline: 9 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Proximal femoral nails (PFNs) are the most common method for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFFs), but postoperative bed rest is required. There is a large amount of blood loss during the operation. Osteoporosis in elderly patients may cause nonunion of fractures and other complications. Arthroplasty can give patients early weight bearing and reduce financial burden, but whether it can replace PFNs remains controversial. To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroplasty and PFNs in the treatment of unstable IFFs in elderly patients. A search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and included relevant articles comparing arthroplasty and PFN. The search time was limited from January 1, 2005 to November 1, 2020. Two investigators independently screened studies, extracted data and evaluated the quality according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. According to the research results, the fixed effect model or random effect model were selected for analysis. The following outcomes were analyzed: Harris Hip score, mortality, complications, operation time, blood loos, hospital stay, weight-bearing time, fracture classification and type of anesthesia. We analyzed four randomized controlled trials that met the requirements. A total of 298 patients were included in these studies. According to the AO/OTA classification, there are 20 A1 types, 136 A2 types, 42 A3 types and 100 unrecorded types. Primary outcome: The Harris Hip Score at the final follow-up of the PFN group was higher [mean difference (MD): 9.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 16.57 to 1.45), Compared with PFN, arthroplasty can achieve weight bearing earlier and shorten hospital stay, but it cannot achieve a better clinical outcome. Arthroplasty cannot replace PFNs in the treatment of unstable IFFs in elderly individuals.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Proximal femoral nails (PFNs) are the most common method for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFFs), but postoperative bed rest is required. There is a large amount of blood loss during the operation. Osteoporosis in elderly patients may cause nonunion of fractures and other complications. Arthroplasty can give patients early weight bearing and reduce financial burden, but whether it can replace PFNs remains controversial.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroplasty and PFNs in the treatment of unstable IFFs in elderly patients.
METHODS METHODS
A search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and included relevant articles comparing arthroplasty and PFN. The search time was limited from January 1, 2005 to November 1, 2020. Two investigators independently screened studies, extracted data and evaluated the quality according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. According to the research results, the fixed effect model or random effect model were selected for analysis. The following outcomes were analyzed: Harris Hip score, mortality, complications, operation time, blood loos, hospital stay, weight-bearing time, fracture classification and type of anesthesia.
RESULTS RESULTS
We analyzed four randomized controlled trials that met the requirements. A total of 298 patients were included in these studies. According to the AO/OTA classification, there are 20 A1 types, 136 A2 types, 42 A3 types and 100 unrecorded types. Primary outcome: The Harris Hip Score at the final follow-up of the PFN group was higher [mean difference (MD): 9.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 16.57 to 1.45),
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Compared with PFN, arthroplasty can achieve weight bearing earlier and shorten hospital stay, but it cannot achieve a better clinical outcome. Arthroplasty cannot replace PFNs in the treatment of unstable IFFs in elderly individuals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34877326
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9878
pmc: PMC8610898
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

9878-9888

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

J Arthroplasty. 2005 Apr;20(3):337-43
pubmed: 15809952
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2008 Aug;16(2):146-9
pubmed: 18725661
J Invest Surg. 2018 Oct;31(5):431-437
pubmed: 28722498
Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug;12(4):1053-1064
pubmed: 32691520
J Orthop Sci. 2016 Jan;21(1):48-52
pubmed: 26755386
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Mar-Apr;10(2):296-301
pubmed: 30828197
Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Dec;72(6):1529-34
pubmed: 11101482
Clin Invest Med. 2015 Apr 08;38(2):E63-72
pubmed: 25864998
J Clin Densitom. 2018 Jan - Mar;21(1):91-97
pubmed: 28233710
Injury. 2015 Jul;46 Suppl 2:S3-8
pubmed: 26052057
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Sep;85(9):1673-81
pubmed: 12954824
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007 Apr;36(4 Suppl):4-7
pubmed: 17547351
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3038-3043
pubmed: 28550964
Int Orthop. 2020 Apr;44(4):623-633
pubmed: 31201487
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2005;39(4):287-94
pubmed: 16269874
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(2):107-12
pubmed: 22491435
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jul;96(27):e7446
pubmed: 28682912
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Oct;87(10):2186-92
pubmed: 16203881
Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct;11(5):745-754
pubmed: 31663280
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jul 1;102(13):1137-1141
pubmed: 32618920
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535
pubmed: 19622551
Hip Int. 2013 May-Jun;23(3):316-22
pubmed: 23760747
J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Feb;32(2):200-8
pubmed: 17275595
Acta Orthop. 2018 Oct;89(5):496-502
pubmed: 29860911
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Nov 19;50(1):117-125
pubmed: 31742370
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Jun;16(6):754-61
pubmed: 26178923
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019 Jul 03;10:2151459319859139
pubmed: 31321116
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Jun;31:274-7
pubmed: 27185726

Auteurs

Wen-Huan Chen (WH)

The Third Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China.

Wen-Xuan Guo (WX)

The First Clinical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China.

Shi-Hua Gao (SH)

The First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China.

Qiu-Shi Wei (QS)

Department of Joint Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China.

Zi-Qi Li (ZQ)

Department of Joint Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China.

Wei He (W)

Department of Joint Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, China. hw13802516062@126.com.

Classifications MeSH