Consumer perceptions of antimicrobial use in animal husbandry: A scoping review.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
06
07
2021
accepted:
23
11
2021
entrez:
8
12
2021
pubmed:
9
12
2021
medline:
7
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antimicrobial use in animal agriculture is often perceived to play a role in the emerging threat of antimicrobial resistance. Increased consumer awareness of this issue places pressure on animal husbandry to adopt policies to reduce or eliminate antimicrobial use. We use a scoping review methodology to assess research on consumer perceptions of antimicrobial drugs in meat products in the United States, Canada, or the European Union. Evaluating peer-reviewed and grey literature, we included studies for assessment if they met these topical and geographic requirements, involved primary data collection, and were originally published in English. Our screening process identified 124 relevant studies. Three reviewers jointly developed a data charting form and independently charted the contents of the studies. Of the 105 studies that measured consumer concern, 77.1% found that consumers were concerned about antimicrobial use in meat production. A minority of studies (29.8% of all studies) queried why consumers hold these views. These studies found human health and animal welfare were the main reasons for concern. Antimicrobial resistance rarely registered as an explicit reason for concern. A smaller group of studies (23.3%) measured the personal characteristics of consumers that expressed concern about antimicrobials. Among these studies, the most common and consistent features of these consumers were gender, age, income, and education. Regarding the methodology used, studies tended to be dominated by either willingness-to-pay studies or Likert scale questionnaires (73.64% of all studies). We recommend consideration of qualitative research into consumer views on this topic, which may provide new perspectives that explain consumer decision-making and mentality that are lacking in the literature. In addition, more research into the difference between what consumers claim is of concern and their ultimate purchasing decisions would be especially valuable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34879112
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261010
pii: PONE-D-21-21650
pmc: PMC8654221
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0261010Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Mar;104(3):2807-2821
pubmed: 33455793
Prev Vet Med. 2021 Sep;194:105428
pubmed: 34271474
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Dec 06;6:452
pubmed: 31867349
Public Health Rep. 2012 Jan-Feb;127(1):4-22
pubmed: 22298919
Environ Health. 2013 Jun 05;12:45
pubmed: 23734758
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Jul;110(7):377-80
pubmed: 27475987
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 9;16(8):e0255911
pubmed: 34370781
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jul;99(7):5892-5903
pubmed: 27179876
Adv Nutr. 2015 Nov 13;6(6):842-51
pubmed: 26567205
Poult Sci. 2019 Jan 1;98(1):209-216
pubmed: 29982708
Transl Anim Sci. 2018 Aug 10;2(4):337-348
pubmed: 32704717
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011 Mar;8(3):337-55
pubmed: 21133795
Health Commun. 2017 Aug;32(8):945-953
pubmed: 27436180
Public Underst Sci. 2016 May;25(4):400-14
pubmed: 27117768
Environ Int. 2016 Sep;94:1-7
pubmed: 27182666
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:141-157
pubmed: 31910712