Remote, proactive, telephone based management of toxicity in outpatients during adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer: pragmatic, cluster randomised trial.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
COVID-19
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
/ adverse effects
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Ambulatory
/ methods
Ontario
Outpatients
Pandemics
Quality of Life
SARS-CoV-2
Surveys and Questionnaires
Telemedicine
Telephone
Treatment Outcome
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 12 2021
08 12 2021
Historique:
entrez:
9
12
2021
pubmed:
10
12
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the effectiveness of remote proactive management of toxicities during chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer. Pragmatic, cluster randomised trial. 20 cancer centres in Ontario, Canada, allocated by covariate constrained randomisation to remote management of toxicities or routine care. All patients starting adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer at each centre. 25 patients from each centre completed patient reported outcome questionnaires. Proactive, standardised, nurse led telephone management of common toxicities at two time points after each chemotherapy cycle. The primary outcome, cluster level mean number of visits to the emergency department or admissions to hospital per patient during the whole course of chemotherapy treatment, was evaluated with routinely available administrative healthcare data. Secondary patient reported outcomes included toxicity, self-efficacy, and quality of life. Baseline characteristics of participants were similar in the intervention (n=944) and control arms (n=1214); 22% were older than 65 years. Penetration (that is, the percentage of patients who received the intervention at each centre) was 50-86%. Mean number of visits to the emergency department or admissions to hospital per patient was 0.91 (standard deviation 0.28) in the intervention arm and 0.94 (0.40) in the control arm (P=0.94); 47% (1014 of 2158 patients) had at least one visit to the emergency department or a hospital admission during chemotherapy. Among 580 participants who completed the patient reported outcome questionnaires, at least one grade 3 toxicity was reported by 48% (134 of 278 patients) in the intervention arm and by 58% (163 of 283) in the control arm. No differences in self-efficacy, anxiety, or depression were found. Compared with baseline, the functional assessment of cancer therapy trial outcome index decreased by 6.1 and 9.0 points in the intervention and control participants, respectively. Proactive, telephone based management of toxicities during chemotherapy did not result in fewer visits to the emergency department or hospital admissions. With the rapid rise in remote care because of the covid-19 pandemic, identifying scalable strategies for remote management of patients during cancer treatment is particularly relevant. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02485678.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34880055
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066588
pmc: PMC8652580
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02485678']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e066588Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR) for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; CCE and EG hold appointments at the OICR Health Services Research Programme; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 9;383(2):129-140
pubmed: 32640131
BMJ. 2021 Mar 3;372:n450
pubmed: 33658187
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 29;106(9):
pubmed: 25265940
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):974-86
pubmed: 9060536
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):769-72
pubmed: 24552326
Support Care Cancer. 2013 May;21(5):1351-8
pubmed: 23274923
IARC Sci Publ. 1991;(95):246-57
pubmed: 1894327
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Mar 8;5:39
pubmed: 30891308
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S80-S84
pubmed: 30985600
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jan;28(1):e12909
pubmed: 30238542
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Nov;67(11):1265-73
pubmed: 25091546
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Sep;22(9):2343-50
pubmed: 24687538
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Oct;35(10):520-529
pubmed: 28570285
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Feb 19;14:24
pubmed: 26892667
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):126-32
pubmed: 25604597
Oral Oncol. 2018 Aug;83:107-114
pubmed: 30098764
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e015016
pubmed: 28592577
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Apr;17(4):437-44
pubmed: 18953579
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):557-65
pubmed: 26644527
Implement Sci. 2007 Nov 30;2:40
pubmed: 18053122
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):120-5
pubmed: 25585617
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:188-198
pubmed: 28676426
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):734-747
pubmed: 33417506
Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74
pubmed: 18388841
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Feb;12(2):140-1
pubmed: 26869654
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):597-602
pubmed: 33410867
BMC Cancer. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):884
pubmed: 31488084
Clin Trials. 2021 Feb;18(1):104-114
pubmed: 33258687
Psychooncology. 2009 Feb;18(2):195-9
pubmed: 18677714
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912823
pubmed: 31596490
Cancer Pract. 2002 May-Jun;10(3):147-54
pubmed: 11972569