Emergency endovascular treatment using a Viabahn stent graft for upper and lower extremity arterial bleeding: a retrospective study.

Arterial bleeding Lower extremity Stent graft Upper extremity Viabahn

Journal

CVIR endovascular
ISSN: 2520-8934
Titre abrégé: CVIR Endovasc
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101738484

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 25 09 2021
accepted: 30 11 2021
entrez: 9 12 2021
pubmed: 10 12 2021
medline: 10 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A Viabahn stent graft (SG) is a heparin-coated self-expandable SG for lower extremity arterial disease that exhibits high flexibility and accuracy in the delivery system. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of emergency endovascular treatment (EVT) using a Viabahn SG for upper and lower extremity arterial bleeding (ULEAB). Consecutive patients with ULEAB who underwent emergency EVT using the Viabahn SG between January 2017 and August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The indications for EVT, location of artery, technical success, clinical success, limb ischemia, periprocedural complications, bleeding-related mortality, 30-day mortality, diameter of the target artery, diameter of the SG, neck length, rebleeding, endoleaks, and patency of the SGs at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were evaluated. EVT using the Viabahn SG was performed in 22 patients (mean age, 72.0 ± 13.0 years; 11 men) and 23 arteries (upper, 6; lower, 17). The indications for EVT were pseudoaneurysm (n = 13, 59.1%), extravasation (n = 9, 39.1%), and inadvertent arterial cannulation (n = 1, 4.3%). The anatomical locations of the 23 ULEAB injuries were the brachiocephalic (1 [4.3%]), subclavian (3 [13.0%]), axillary (1 [4.3%]), brachial (1 [4.3%]), common iliac (4 [17.4%]), external iliac (8 [34.8%]), common femoral (2 [8.7%]), superficial femoral (2 [8.7%]), and popliteal (1 [4.3%]) arteries. The technical and clinical success rates were 100%. The rates of limb ischemia, periprocedural complications, and bleeding-related mortality were 0%, whereas the 30-day mortality rate was 22.7%. The mean diameters of the arteries and SGs were 7.7 ± 2.2 and 8.9 ± 2.3 mm, respectively. The mean neck length was 20.4 ± 11.3 mm. No endoleaks or rebleeding occurred during the follow-up period (mean, 169 ± 177 days). Two SG occlusions without limb ischemia occurred in the external iliac and brachial arteries after 1 and 4 months, respectively. Subsequently, cumulative SG patency was confirmed after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months in 91.7%, 91.7%, 81.5%, and 81.5% of patients, respectively. Emergency EVT using the Viabahn SG for ULEAB was effective and safe according to short-term outcomes. Appropriate size selection and neck length are important for successful treatment. SG patency was good after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
A Viabahn stent graft (SG) is a heparin-coated self-expandable SG for lower extremity arterial disease that exhibits high flexibility and accuracy in the delivery system. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of emergency endovascular treatment (EVT) using a Viabahn SG for upper and lower extremity arterial bleeding (ULEAB).
METHODS METHODS
Consecutive patients with ULEAB who underwent emergency EVT using the Viabahn SG between January 2017 and August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The indications for EVT, location of artery, technical success, clinical success, limb ischemia, periprocedural complications, bleeding-related mortality, 30-day mortality, diameter of the target artery, diameter of the SG, neck length, rebleeding, endoleaks, and patency of the SGs at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
EVT using the Viabahn SG was performed in 22 patients (mean age, 72.0 ± 13.0 years; 11 men) and 23 arteries (upper, 6; lower, 17). The indications for EVT were pseudoaneurysm (n = 13, 59.1%), extravasation (n = 9, 39.1%), and inadvertent arterial cannulation (n = 1, 4.3%). The anatomical locations of the 23 ULEAB injuries were the brachiocephalic (1 [4.3%]), subclavian (3 [13.0%]), axillary (1 [4.3%]), brachial (1 [4.3%]), common iliac (4 [17.4%]), external iliac (8 [34.8%]), common femoral (2 [8.7%]), superficial femoral (2 [8.7%]), and popliteal (1 [4.3%]) arteries. The technical and clinical success rates were 100%. The rates of limb ischemia, periprocedural complications, and bleeding-related mortality were 0%, whereas the 30-day mortality rate was 22.7%. The mean diameters of the arteries and SGs were 7.7 ± 2.2 and 8.9 ± 2.3 mm, respectively. The mean neck length was 20.4 ± 11.3 mm. No endoleaks or rebleeding occurred during the follow-up period (mean, 169 ± 177 days). Two SG occlusions without limb ischemia occurred in the external iliac and brachial arteries after 1 and 4 months, respectively. Subsequently, cumulative SG patency was confirmed after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months in 91.7%, 91.7%, 81.5%, and 81.5% of patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Emergency EVT using the Viabahn SG for ULEAB was effective and safe according to short-term outcomes. Appropriate size selection and neck length are important for successful treatment. SG patency was good after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34882296
doi: 10.1186/s42155-021-00273-z
pii: 10.1186/s42155-021-00273-z
pmc: PMC8660932
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

83

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5 Suppl 4):S315-20
pubmed: 23114487
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Dec;43(12):1946-1948
pubmed: 32851426
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Sep;19(5):405-10
pubmed: 24214780
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Feb;45(2):381-6
pubmed: 17264020
J Nippon Med Sch. 2017;84(1):41-44
pubmed: 28331143
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Oct;24(5):709-717
pubmed: 28659059
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Apr-May;16(3):156-62
pubmed: 25770666
Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1785-92
pubmed: 22921384
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Nov;60(5):1309-1314
pubmed: 24997806
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Feb;24(2):165-73; quiz 174
pubmed: 23369553
Jpn J Radiol. 2021 Sep 4;:
pubmed: 34480719
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;115(8):1123-9
pubmed: 25728645
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Oct;28(10):1432-1437.e3
pubmed: 28757285
Emerg Radiol. 2009 May;16(3):175-84
pubmed: 18941810

Auteurs

Tatsuo Ueda (T)

Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8603, Tokyo, Japan. s9015@nms.ac.jp.

Satoru Murata (S)

Center for Interventional Radiology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, 3426-3 Anesaki, 299-0011, Ichihara City, Chiba, Japan.

Hiroyuki Tajima (H)

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Saitama, 350-1298, Hidaka City, Japan.

Hidemasa Saito (H)

Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8603, Tokyo, Japan.

Daisuke Yasui (D)

Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, 1-396 Kosugi-machi, Nakahara-ku, 211-8533, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan.

Fumie Sugihara (F)

Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8603, Tokyo, Japan.

Shohei Mizushima (S)

Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Chiba, 270-1694, Inzai City, Japan.

Takahiko Mine (T)

Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Chiba, 270-1694, Inzai City, Japan.

Hiroshi Kawamata (H)

Department of Radiology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, 3211 Kozukue-Cho, Kohoku-Ku, 222-0036, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, Japan.

Hiromitsu Hayashi (H)

Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8603, Tokyo, Japan.

Shin-Ichiro Kumita (SI)

Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8603, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH