Abacavir dosing in neonates from birth to 3 months of life: a population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation study.
Journal
The lancet. HIV
ISSN: 2352-3018
Titre abrégé: Lancet HIV
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101645355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
received:
08
06
2021
revised:
17
09
2021
accepted:
21
09
2021
pubmed:
10
12
2021
medline:
15
3
2022
entrez:
9
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
No evidence-based optimal dosing guidance is available for abacavir liquid formulation use from birth. We used abacavir pharmacokinetic data from neonates and infants to determine an exact abacavir dosing strategy (mg/kg) for infants aged 0-3 months and to propose dosing by WHO weight band for neonates. Abacavir pharmacokinetic and safety data were pooled from three completed studies (1997-2020): PACTG 321 (USA), the Tygerberg Cohort (South Africa), and IMPAACT P1106 (South Africa). PACTG 321 and the Tygerberg Cohort were performed in neonates exposed to HIV receiving a single dose of abacavir. IMPAACT P1106 included predominantly low birthweight (<2500 g) infants on antiretroviral therapy enrolled when they were younger than 3 months. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model and performed simulations to achieve abacavir exposures (area under the curve for 0-12 h) within the target range of 3·2-25·2 μg·h/mL, previously reported in older children. 45 infants contributed 308 abacavir concentrations; 21 neonates were younger than 15 days. At first pharmacokinetic assessment, median postnatal age for PACTG 321 was 1 day and median bodyweight was 3·1 kg; for the Tygerberg Cohort it was 10 days and 3·3 kg; and for IMPAACT P1106 it was 73 days and 3·8 kg. Our model predicted a slow abacavir clearance of 2·51 mL/min per kg at birth, which doubled by 4 weeks of age. Therapeutic targets were achieved with exact abacavir doses of 2·0 mg/kg twice daily from 0 weeks to 4 weeks and 4·0 mg/kg twice daily from 4 weeks to 12 weeks. A fixed weight-band dosing strategy of 8 mg (for 2-3 kg), 10 mg (3-4 kg), and 12 mg (4-5 kg) abacavir twice daily achieved target exposures throughout the first 4 weeks of life without the need for dose adjustment due to age or bodyweight changes. No adverse events of grade 3 or higher were related to abacavir. Integration of these dosing strategies into national and international guidelines for the abacavir liquid formulation will expand antiretroviral options from birth and simplify the clinical management of neonates with HIV. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Mental Health, and the Collaborative Initiative for Paediatric HIV Education and Research Programme.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
No evidence-based optimal dosing guidance is available for abacavir liquid formulation use from birth. We used abacavir pharmacokinetic data from neonates and infants to determine an exact abacavir dosing strategy (mg/kg) for infants aged 0-3 months and to propose dosing by WHO weight band for neonates.
METHODS
Abacavir pharmacokinetic and safety data were pooled from three completed studies (1997-2020): PACTG 321 (USA), the Tygerberg Cohort (South Africa), and IMPAACT P1106 (South Africa). PACTG 321 and the Tygerberg Cohort were performed in neonates exposed to HIV receiving a single dose of abacavir. IMPAACT P1106 included predominantly low birthweight (<2500 g) infants on antiretroviral therapy enrolled when they were younger than 3 months. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model and performed simulations to achieve abacavir exposures (area under the curve for 0-12 h) within the target range of 3·2-25·2 μg·h/mL, previously reported in older children.
FINDINGS
45 infants contributed 308 abacavir concentrations; 21 neonates were younger than 15 days. At first pharmacokinetic assessment, median postnatal age for PACTG 321 was 1 day and median bodyweight was 3·1 kg; for the Tygerberg Cohort it was 10 days and 3·3 kg; and for IMPAACT P1106 it was 73 days and 3·8 kg. Our model predicted a slow abacavir clearance of 2·51 mL/min per kg at birth, which doubled by 4 weeks of age. Therapeutic targets were achieved with exact abacavir doses of 2·0 mg/kg twice daily from 0 weeks to 4 weeks and 4·0 mg/kg twice daily from 4 weeks to 12 weeks. A fixed weight-band dosing strategy of 8 mg (for 2-3 kg), 10 mg (3-4 kg), and 12 mg (4-5 kg) abacavir twice daily achieved target exposures throughout the first 4 weeks of life without the need for dose adjustment due to age or bodyweight changes. No adverse events of grade 3 or higher were related to abacavir.
INTERPRETATION
Integration of these dosing strategies into national and international guidelines for the abacavir liquid formulation will expand antiretroviral options from birth and simplify the clinical management of neonates with HIV.
FUNDING
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Mental Health, and the Collaborative Initiative for Paediatric HIV Education and Research Programme.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34883066
pii: S2352-3018(21)00266-6
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00266-6
pmc: PMC8760861
mid: NIHMS1765685
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-HIV Agents
0
Anti-Retroviral Agents
0
Dideoxynucleosides
0
abacavir
WR2TIP26VS
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e24-e31Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275201800001C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068632
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI069453
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068616
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI106716
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI069536
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275201800001I
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests AB, EVC, AV, MFC, RM, HR, and MM received funding from the IMPAACT Network. MM received funding from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare. AV received funding from ViiV Healthcare, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Gilead Sciences, and from Jansen for participation in a data and safety monitoring board. HR received funding from AbbVie. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Jun;44(6):1686-90
pubmed: 10817729
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47(6):351-71
pubmed: 18479171
N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 20;359(21):2233-44
pubmed: 19020325
Lancet HIV. 2016 Feb;3(2):e64-75
pubmed: 26847228
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jun;93(6):479-82
pubmed: 23588323
Antivir Ther. 2007;12(5):825-30
pubmed: 17713166
N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 18;349(12):1157-67
pubmed: 13679531
AAPS PharmSci. 2002;4(4):E27
pubmed: 12645999
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:303-32
pubmed: 17914927
Biochem J. 1979 Dec 15;184(3):705-7
pubmed: 120201
AAPS J. 2009 Jun;11(2):371-80
pubmed: 19452283
J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Mar;45(3):257-64
pubmed: 15703361
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):1362-4
pubmed: 15520122
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;85(9):2066-2075
pubmed: 31141195
Pediatr Res. 1967 May;1(3):165-8
pubmed: 6080860
Lancet HIV. 2021 Mar;8(3):e149-e157
pubmed: 33242457
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 1;72(11):2032-2034
pubmed: 32697327