Qualitative assessment of the intention of Chinese community health workers to implement advance care planning using theory of planned behavior.
Advance care planning
Community health services
Medical personnel
Theory of planned behavior
Journal
BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Dec 2021
10 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
16
06
2021
accepted:
22
11
2021
entrez:
10
12
2021
pubmed:
11
12
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aging population coupled with progressive medical technology has increased the demand for improved quality of end-of-life in China. However, implementation of an advance care planning (ACP) program in mainland China is still in its infancy owing to the significant influence of filial piety in Chinese culture. Research on implementation of ACP program among community health workers (CHWs) is limited. The current study sought to explore the willingness of CHWs to implement ACP based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and provide a reference for promotion of ACP in Chinese communities. Phenomenological qualitative study using semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded. Colaizzi's method was used for data analysis. The study received ethical approval and all participants provided written consent. Thirteen CHWs from 3 community health service centers (CHSCs) in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China were interviewed. Through the analysis of the interview content, we determined that most CHWs have a supportive attitude towards the implementation of ACP, the reasons for which are as follows: relieve suffering of patients and respect their medical autonomy; relieve economic and psychological burden on family members; promote development of community palliative care. However, some CHWs believe that the implementation of ACP will lead to doctor-patient disputes and medical risks. CHWs reported that the support of patients and their families, community lawyers, psychosocial professionals, and CHSCs senior managers helped them to implement ACP. In addition, they indicated that the improvement of doctor-patient communication ability, the improvement of community medical environment, the support of government policy, and the training of CHWs were the promoting factors influencing their implementation of ACP. The hindrance factors include insufficient allocation of community health human resources, imperfect ACP legislation in China, and deep-rooted traditional culture. Findings demonstrated that Chinese CHWs tend to support the implementation of ACP, but their willingness to implement is affected by different factors. CHSCs should actively organize standardized ACP training and comprehensively consider community medical environment, organizational norms, and human resources in implementation of ACP.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The aging population coupled with progressive medical technology has increased the demand for improved quality of end-of-life in China. However, implementation of an advance care planning (ACP) program in mainland China is still in its infancy owing to the significant influence of filial piety in Chinese culture. Research on implementation of ACP program among community health workers (CHWs) is limited. The current study sought to explore the willingness of CHWs to implement ACP based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and provide a reference for promotion of ACP in Chinese communities.
METHODS
METHODS
Phenomenological qualitative study using semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded. Colaizzi's method was used for data analysis. The study received ethical approval and all participants provided written consent.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Thirteen CHWs from 3 community health service centers (CHSCs) in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China were interviewed. Through the analysis of the interview content, we determined that most CHWs have a supportive attitude towards the implementation of ACP, the reasons for which are as follows: relieve suffering of patients and respect their medical autonomy; relieve economic and psychological burden on family members; promote development of community palliative care. However, some CHWs believe that the implementation of ACP will lead to doctor-patient disputes and medical risks. CHWs reported that the support of patients and their families, community lawyers, psychosocial professionals, and CHSCs senior managers helped them to implement ACP. In addition, they indicated that the improvement of doctor-patient communication ability, the improvement of community medical environment, the support of government policy, and the training of CHWs were the promoting factors influencing their implementation of ACP. The hindrance factors include insufficient allocation of community health human resources, imperfect ACP legislation in China, and deep-rooted traditional culture.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Findings demonstrated that Chinese CHWs tend to support the implementation of ACP, but their willingness to implement is affected by different factors. CHSCs should actively organize standardized ACP training and comprehensively consider community medical environment, organizational norms, and human resources in implementation of ACP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34886846
doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00885-1
pii: 10.1186/s12904-021-00885-1
pmc: PMC8662910
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
187Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(23-24):4276-4297
pubmed: 31494997
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2017 Nov 2;23(11):552-557
pubmed: 29172890
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Aug;56(2):213-221.e4
pubmed: 29775694
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Sep;26(6):1696-1706
pubmed: 29895229
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;36(4):253-263
pubmed: 28570380
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):e023107
pubmed: 30679290
Minn Med. 1992 Aug;75(8):27-9
pubmed: 1406526
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Sep;68(9):2021-33
pubmed: 22117569
Clin Geriatr Med. 2016 May;32(2):247-60
pubmed: 27113144
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2019 Aug;21(4):264-271
pubmed: 30933016
Int J Older People Nurs. 2021 Nov;16(6):e12409
pubmed: 34291574
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):451
pubmed: 33228655
J Palliat Med. 2019 Apr;22(4):427-431
pubmed: 30481086
Health Expect. 2013 Mar;16(1):43-55
pubmed: 21615641
J Health Care Chaplain. 2014;20(3):109-22
pubmed: 24926897
BMJ. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):602-3
pubmed: 1393070
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Nov-Dec;32(6):835-846
pubmed: 31704752
J Formos Med Assoc. 2013 Oct;112(10):589-99
pubmed: 23768949
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Jan;37(1):5-11
pubmed: 31030524
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):821-832.e1
pubmed: 28062339
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):390-400
pubmed: 25680737
Nurs Outlook. 2015 Jan-Feb;63(1):51-9
pubmed: 25645482
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2020 Apr 2;26(4):175-182
pubmed: 32378488
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2019 May 2;80(5):263-267
pubmed: 31059340
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):191-199
pubmed: 31122099
Aust J Rural Health. 2014 Feb;22(1):23-8
pubmed: 24460996
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):362
pubmed: 31174530
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 Nov;37(6):E400-10
pubmed: 21059573
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Sep;37(9):743-749
pubmed: 32052643
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jul;19(7):633-638
pubmed: 29153752
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Sep;26(17-18):2633-2645
pubmed: 27995678
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 6;20(1):721
pubmed: 32762694
Palliat Med. 2008 Sep;22(6):736-43
pubmed: 18715973