Absence of first-pass isolation is associated with poor pulmonary vein isolation durability and atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes.
adenosine triphosphate
atrial fibrillation
durable pulmonary vein isolation
first‐pass isolation
pulmonary vein reconnection
Journal
Journal of arrhythmia
ISSN: 1880-4276
Titre abrégé: J Arrhythm
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101263026
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
22
05
2021
revised:
17
08
2021
accepted:
19
08
2021
entrez:
10
12
2021
pubmed:
11
12
2021
medline:
11
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is the main cause of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. This study aimed to examine the effect of first-pass PV isolation (PVI) on PV reconnection frequency during the procedure and on AF ablation outcomes. This retrospective study included 446 patients with drug-refractory AF (370 men, aged 64 ± 10 years) who underwent initial PVI using an open-irrigated contact force catheter between January 2015 and October 2016. We investigated the effect of first-pass PVI on PV reconnection during spontaneous PV reconnection and dormant conduction after an adenosine triphosphate challenge. First-pass PVI was achieved in 69% (617/892) of ipsilateral PVs, of which we observed PV reconnection during the procedure in 134 (22%) PVs. This value was significantly lower than that observed in those without first-pass PVI (50%, 138/275) ( Absence of first-pass PVI was associated with a higher frequency of spontaneous PV reconnection and dormant conduction and poor ablation outcomes. First-pass isolation may be a useful marker for better PVI durability.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is the main cause of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. This study aimed to examine the effect of first-pass PV isolation (PVI) on PV reconnection frequency during the procedure and on AF ablation outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective study included 446 patients with drug-refractory AF (370 men, aged 64 ± 10 years) who underwent initial PVI using an open-irrigated contact force catheter between January 2015 and October 2016. We investigated the effect of first-pass PVI on PV reconnection during spontaneous PV reconnection and dormant conduction after an adenosine triphosphate challenge.
RESULTS
RESULTS
First-pass PVI was achieved in 69% (617/892) of ipsilateral PVs, of which we observed PV reconnection during the procedure in 134 (22%) PVs. This value was significantly lower than that observed in those without first-pass PVI (50%, 138/275) (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Absence of first-pass PVI was associated with a higher frequency of spontaneous PV reconnection and dormant conduction and poor ablation outcomes. First-pass isolation may be a useful marker for better PVI durability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34887951
doi: 10.1002/joa3.12629
pii: JOA312629
pmc: PMC8637089
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1468-1476Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
KI received honoraria from Johnson KK and Medtronic, Inc The other authors (YN, NT, KT, TO, YH, TO, MO, HI, KT, RN, RK, YK, AO, KI, MO, and KF) declare no conflicts of interest for this article.
Références
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;4(1):99-108
pubmed: 29600792
Front Physiol. 2020 Dec 15;11:594654
pubmed: 33384608
J Cardiol. 2016 Oct;68(4):335-41
pubmed: 26603325
Circulation. 2005 Jan 18;111(2):127-35
pubmed: 15623542
Circulation. 2004 Oct 12;110(15):2090-6
pubmed: 15466640
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Feb 15;301:96-102
pubmed: 31759685
Circ J. 2007 May;71(5):753-60
pubmed: 17457004
Circ J. 2017 Oct 25;81(11):1596-1602
pubmed: 28579576
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Apr;5(2):295-301
pubmed: 22042883
Circulation. 2005 Aug 2;112(5):627-35
pubmed: 16061753
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug 1;5(4):691-700
pubmed: 22652692
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):e275-e444
pubmed: 28506916
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Oct;32(10):1307-12
pubmed: 19796347
Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 7;36(46):3276-87
pubmed: 26321237