Trastuzumab Emtansine Plus Pertuzumab Versus Taxane Plus Trastuzumab Plus Pertuzumab After Anthracycline for High-Risk Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: The Phase III KAITLIN Study.
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
/ adverse effects
Adult
Aged
Anthracyclines
/ adverse effects
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic
/ adverse effects
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ adverse effects
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Time Factors
Trastuzumab
/ adverse effects
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 02 2022
10 02 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
11
12
2021
medline:
22
2
2022
entrez:
10
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to improve efficacy and reduce toxicity of high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer (EBC) treatment by replacing taxanes and trastuzumab with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). The phase III KAITLIN study (NCT01966471) included adults with excised HER2-positive EBC (node-positive or node-negative, hormone receptor-negative, and tumor > 2.0 cm). Postsurgery, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to anthracycline-based chemotherapy (three-four cycles) and then 18 cycles of T-DM1 plus pertuzumab (AC-KP) or taxane (three-four cycles) plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (AC-THP). Adjuvant radiotherapy/endocrine therapy was permitted. Coprimary end points were invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in the intention-to-treat node-positive and overall populations with hierarchical testing. The median follow-up was 57.1 months (interquartile range, 52.1-60.1 months) for AC-THP (n = 918) and 57.0 months (interquartile range, 52.1-59.8 months) for AC-KP (n = 928). There was no significant IDFS difference between arms in the node-positive (n = 1,658; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.32) or overall population (n = 1846; stratified HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.32). In the overall population, the three-year IDFS was 94.2% (95% CI, 92.7 to 95.8) for AC-THP and 93.1% (95% CI, 91.4 to 94.7) for AC-KP. Treatment completion rates (ie, 18 cycles) were 88.4% for AC-THP and 65.0% for AC-KP (difference driven by T-DM1 discontinuation because of laboratory abnormalities [12.5%]). Similar rates of grade ≥ 3 (55.4% The primary end point was not met. Both arms achieved favorable IDFS. Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab plus chemotherapy remains the standard of care for high-risk HER2-positive EBC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34890214
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00896
pmc: PMC8824393
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anthracyclines
0
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic
0
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
pertuzumab
K16AIQ8CTM
Trastuzumab
P188ANX8CK
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
SE2KH7T06F
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01966471']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
438-448Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 02;9:CD004421
pubmed: 31476253
Cancer. 2019 Nov 15;125(22):3974-3984
pubmed: 31318460
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;37(25):2206-2216
pubmed: 31157583
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 1;29(1):89-96
pubmed: 21098316
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):689-99
pubmed: 24793816
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):141-148
pubmed: 28056202
Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2278-84
pubmed: 23704196
Cancer Res. 2008 Nov 15;68(22):9280-90
pubmed: 19010901
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):122-131
pubmed: 28581356
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):25-32
pubmed: 22153890
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):732-742
pubmed: 28526536
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1783-91
pubmed: 23020162
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):115-126
pubmed: 29175149
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44
pubmed: 9440735
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jul;128(2):347-56
pubmed: 20730488
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Mar;12(3):236-44
pubmed: 21354370
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 8;372(2):134-41
pubmed: 25564897
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 20;30(33):4071-6
pubmed: 22826271
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb;16(2):77-78
pubmed: 30644455
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 17;358(16):1663-71
pubmed: 18420499
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jan 15;20(2):456-68
pubmed: 24097864
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):743-754
pubmed: 28526538
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 20;23(12):2676-85
pubmed: 15837982
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):617-628
pubmed: 30516102
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):109-19
pubmed: 22149875
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1437-44
pubmed: 24733796
Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1194-1220
pubmed: 31161190
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1673-84
pubmed: 16236738
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1273-83
pubmed: 21991949