A framework for involving coproduction partners in research about young people with type 1 diabetes.

consumer engagement coproduction grounded theory impact patient and public involvement patient experience type 1 diabetes mellitus

Journal

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
ISSN: 1369-7625
Titre abrégé: Health Expect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2022
Historique:
revised: 24 06 2021
received: 11 03 2021
accepted: 14 11 2021
pubmed: 11 12 2021
medline: 16 3 2022
entrez: 10 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Involvement of end-users in research can enhance its quality, relevance, credibility and legitimacy; however, the processes through which these changes occur are unclear. Our aim was to explore a coproduction research team's experiences of their involvement in research about young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Semi-structured interviews conducted with two young people with T1DM, two parents, one diabetes educator, one endocrinologist-scientist and one research-engineer explored experiences of coproduction research and its impact on both the research and the participants. Drawing on grounded theory, we undertook inductive analysis and storyline mapping to develop a theorized framework of mechanisms supporting the process of coproduction in T1DM research with young people. The framework involving coproduction partners in research about young people with type 1 diabetes centres on the unique expertize that different team members bring to the research and describes conditions that enable expert contributions through the enactment of a variety of expert roles. The framework also describes outcomes-the impact of the expert contributions on both the research and the team members involved. The findings of this small exploratory study provide a sound foundation to develop further understanding about structures and processes that are integral for the success of coproduction research teams. The framework may provide a guide for researchers planning to incorporate coproduction, on elements that are important for this model of research to succeed. It may also inform coproduction impact assessment research and be used for hypothesis testing and expansion in future studies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Involvement of end-users in research can enhance its quality, relevance, credibility and legitimacy; however, the processes through which these changes occur are unclear. Our aim was to explore a coproduction research team's experiences of their involvement in research about young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
METHODS
Semi-structured interviews conducted with two young people with T1DM, two parents, one diabetes educator, one endocrinologist-scientist and one research-engineer explored experiences of coproduction research and its impact on both the research and the participants. Drawing on grounded theory, we undertook inductive analysis and storyline mapping to develop a theorized framework of mechanisms supporting the process of coproduction in T1DM research with young people.
FINDINGS
The framework involving coproduction partners in research about young people with type 1 diabetes centres on the unique expertize that different team members bring to the research and describes conditions that enable expert contributions through the enactment of a variety of expert roles. The framework also describes outcomes-the impact of the expert contributions on both the research and the team members involved.
CONCLUSION
The findings of this small exploratory study provide a sound foundation to develop further understanding about structures and processes that are integral for the success of coproduction research teams. The framework may provide a guide for researchers planning to incorporate coproduction, on elements that are important for this model of research to succeed. It may also inform coproduction impact assessment research and be used for hypothesis testing and expansion in future studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34890473
doi: 10.1111/hex.13403
pmc: PMC8849360
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

430-442

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89
pubmed: 24568690
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e022154
pubmed: 30121606
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Mar 12;5:14
pubmed: 30915234
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Mar;4(2):133-45
pubmed: 25825842
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 30;8(7):e017124
pubmed: 30061427
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):358-367
pubmed: 31343799
BMJ Open. 2020 May 18;10(5):e033370
pubmed: 32430448
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(2):299-311
pubmed: 31538723
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):430-442
pubmed: 34890473
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:m4785
pubmed: 33593804
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 28;17(1):33
pubmed: 30922339
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):637-50
pubmed: 22809132
J Ment Health. 2016;25(1):28-35
pubmed: 26733079
Health Expect. 2018 Aug;21(4):693-694
pubmed: 30168263
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Jun 25;4:19
pubmed: 29983994
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jul;23(3):158-167
pubmed: 29504424
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801
pubmed: 31012259
Health Expect. 2021 May;24 Suppl 1:3-9
pubmed: 31461561
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):721-730
pubmed: 30927334
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):519-528
pubmed: 27338242
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:n178
pubmed: 33593805
JMIR Diabetes. 2021 Feb 2;6(1):e20973
pubmed: 33528374
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Dec;29(6):1168-1180
pubmed: 32596992
Health Expect. 2014 Dec;17(6):755-64
pubmed: 23107054
Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 May 14;9:18
pubmed: 21569591
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Mar 31;6:11
pubmed: 32266085
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):950-963
pubmed: 29696740
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 May 9;2:16
pubmed: 29062517
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1):45-51
pubmed: 25228453
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jan 5;7(1):1
pubmed: 33402216
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Aug;27(4):1219-1229
pubmed: 29847015
BMJ. 2021 Feb 16;372:n434
pubmed: 33593753
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 21;6:56
pubmed: 32974052
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 May 24;4:16
pubmed: 29850029
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Oct;43(10):924-929
pubmed: 33543685
J Particip Med. 2018 May 10;10(2):e8
pubmed: 33052121
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jun 19;6:33
pubmed: 32579132
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Feb;71(2):105-106
pubmed: 27647137

Auteurs

Jane Desborough (J)

Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, Research School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Anne Parkinson (A)

Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, Research School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Fiona Lewis (F)

Australian National University Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Harry Ebbeck (H)

Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, Research School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Michelle Banfield (M)

Centre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Christine Phillips (C)

Australian National University Medical School, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH