Parsing Intra- and Inter-Individual Covariation Between the Sensory Attributes and Appeal of E-Cigarettes: Associations and Gender Differences.


Journal

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
ISSN: 1469-994X
Titre abrégé: Nicotine Tob Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815751

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 06 2022
Historique:
received: 23 07 2021
revised: 24 11 2021
accepted: 08 12 2021
pubmed: 11 12 2021
medline: 18 6 2022
entrez: 10 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Perceived sensory attributes of e-cigarettes may associate with their appeal. However, limited studies have accounted for individuals' variability in sensory attributes or have addressed how associations of sensory attributes with appeal may differ by gender. Individuals (n = 119, 32.8% female) who currently used combustible cigarettes and/or e-cigarettes attended one laboratory session in which they completed a standardized e-cigarette puffing procedure according to a 10 Flavor (green apple, strawberry, chocolate, vanilla, menthol, koolada, peppermint, spearmint, subtle tobacco, and full-flavored tobacco) × 2 Nicotine Formulation (free-base, salt) double-blind factorial design. The mean nicotine concentration was 23.4 (SD = 0.9) mg/mL in the nicotine salt formulations and 23.8 (SD = 1.7) mg/mL in the free-base formulations. Following each trial, participants completed ratings of sensory attributes (sweet, smooth, cool, bitter, harsh) and appeal (mean of liking, disliking [reverse-scored], and willingness-to-use-again ratings). Sensory attributes were partitioned into between-person and within-person variables. Gender was tested as a moderator of associations of sensory attributes with appeal. Sweet, smooth, and cool sensory attributes positively associated with appeal at the between- and within-person level (ps < .001). Bitter and harsh negatively associated with appeal at the between- and within-person level (ps < .001). The associations of between-person sweet, smooth, and cool ratings with appeal was larger in males compared to females. The associations of within-person smooth, bitter, and harsh with appeal was larger in females compared to males. This study showed important gender differences in associations of sensory attributes and appeal. While evidence suggests that sensory attributes may contribute to the appeal of e-cigarettes, there is little experimental evidence accounting for individual variability in sensory attributes and whether sensory attribute-appeal associations differ by gender. The current study provides evidence that average sweet, cool, and smooth ratings positively associated with appeal and that these associations were larger in males. Within-person bitter, harsh, and smooth ratings significantly associated with appeal in both genders, but these associations were larger in females compared to males. Data from the current report reinforces the need for researchers to study gender stratified effects in tobacco regulatory science.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34891167
pii: 6459060
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab255
pmc: PMC9199929
doi:

Substances chimiques

Flavoring Agents 0
Nicotine 6M3C89ZY6R

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1012-1019

Subventions

Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : K24 DA048160
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA180905
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

Food Qual Prefer. 2015 Jun 1;42:12-19
pubmed: 25663751
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Nov 01;168:176-180
pubmed: 27676583
Tob Control. 2016 Nov;25(Suppl 2):ii55-ii61
pubmed: 27708124
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Feb 7;20(3):383-387
pubmed: 28472411
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Mar;34(2):303-307
pubmed: 31961168
Food Qual Prefer. 2018 Apr;65:175-180
pubmed: 31320785
Kans J Med. 2020 Dec 11;13:318-321
pubmed: 33343826
Tob Control. 2020 Nov;29(6):679-686
pubmed: 31852818
Public Health Nurs. 2020 Jul;37(4):569-580
pubmed: 32436297
Food Qual Prefer. 2013 Apr 1;28(1):213-221
pubmed: 23538555
BMJ. 2019 Jul 31;366:l4378
pubmed: 31366597
JAMA. 2019 Nov 12;322(18):1824-1827
pubmed: 31524940
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jul;18(7):1588-95
pubmed: 26783293
Addict Behav. 2019 Apr;91:37-44
pubmed: 30470456
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194145
pubmed: 29543907
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Oct 1;203:99-106
pubmed: 31434028
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2032757
pubmed: 33433597
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2111336
pubmed: 34097049
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Apr;17(4):473-8
pubmed: 25762758
Addict Behav Rep. 2021 Jan 16;13:100338
pubmed: 33644294
Tob Regul Sci. 2017 Jan;3(1):68-80
pubmed: 30713989
Physiol Behav. 2019 Mar 15;201:111-122
pubmed: 30557565
Curr Addict Rep. 2017 Dec;4(4):422-430
pubmed: 29545987
Tob Control. 2021 Mar;30(2):185-191
pubmed: 32041831
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112464
pubmed: 34097051
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Aug 28;8(8):2699-2702
pubmed: 31548959
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Jun;68(6):1162-1169
pubmed: 33478920
Tob Control. 2009 Dec;18(6):459-65
pubmed: 19700436
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106384
pubmed: 33359018
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):806-813
pubmed: 30997500
Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119-27
pubmed: 1932883
Eat Behav. 2021 Apr;41:101497
pubmed: 33714925
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Feb;17(2):186-92
pubmed: 25332459
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 May;227(1):177-92
pubmed: 23271193
Nicotine Tob Res. 2001 May;3(2):141-50
pubmed: 11403728
Prev Med. 2018 Aug;113:109-115
pubmed: 29763683
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):843-847
pubmed: 30312465

Auteurs

Raina D Pang (RD)

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Tyler B Mason (TB)

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Addison K Kapsner (AK)

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Adam M Leventhal (AM)

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH