Percutaneous biliary stone clearance: is there still a need? A 10-year single-centre experience.


Journal

Clinical radiology
ISSN: 1365-229X
Titre abrégé: Clin Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1306016

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2022
Historique:
received: 11 05 2021
accepted: 21 10 2021
pubmed: 12 12 2021
medline: 5 3 2022
entrez: 11 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous biliary stone clearance in a single hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) centre. All patients who underwent percutaneous biliary stone clearance between 2010 and 2020 at a HPB centre were identified from the radiology information system. Their demographic data, presentation, previous surgery, number/size of biliary calculi, success and complications were collected from patient records. Unpaired student's t-test was used to compare numerical variables and the Chi-square test was used to compare categorical data. Sixty-eight patients aged between 58.5-91.1 years underwent the procedure, and 42.6% (29/68) had the procedure due to surgically altered anatomy precluding endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The most common presentation was cholangitis (62%). The success rate of percutaneous stone clearance was 92.7%. The average number of calculi was two (range 1-12). Of the patients included, 4.4% developed pancreatitis, 4.4% developed cholangitis, and 1.5% had hepatic artery branch pseudoaneurysm successfully treated with transarterial embolisation. There was no significant difference in success or complication rates between the different access sites (right lobe, left lobe, roux-loop, T-tube, p=0.7767). Percutaneous biliary stone clearance is safe and effective and will continue to play an important role where ERCP fails or is impossible due surgically altered anatomy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34893340
pii: S0009-9260(21)00512-2
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.10.015
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

130-135

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Y Kilic (Y)

Imaging Department, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

A Graham (A)

Imaging Department, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

N P Tait (NP)

Imaging Department, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

D Spalding (D)

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.

P Vlavianos (P)

Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

L R Jiao (LR)

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.

A Alsafi (A)

Imaging Department, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: a.alsafi@imperial.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH