Influence of selected factors on the Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes phyla and the Lactobacillaceae family in the digestive tract of sheep.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 12 2021
10 12 2021
Historique:
received:
19
04
2021
accepted:
22
11
2021
entrez:
11
12
2021
pubmed:
12
12
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this study, we used 10 healthy sheep, which gave birth to healthy twins. Stool samples were collected from mothers and their offspring 3 times during the study (0, 28 and 56 day postpartum). Milk samples were taken from the mothers at the same time. RT PCR analysis of faeces and milk was performed in order to assess the level of bacteria from the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla including the family Lactobacillaceae (phylum Firmicutes). The composition of mother's milk was also analyzed and their BCS. The data were compiled statistically. The obtained results showed that the level of the studied groups of bacteria may change due to the change of diet. Additionally, there were significant differences between lambs and mothers in the levels of the studied groups of bacteria. Analysis also shown that in the digestive system of mothers was a smaller disproportion in the level of the studied bacterial phyla than in lambs. The results also indicated the occurrence of differences in the bacterial composition at the individual level, both in ewes and their offspring. Additionally, in the conducted experiment, there were differences in the level of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes groups depending on the sex.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34893656
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03207-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-03207-w
pmc: PMC8664831
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23801Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
FAO. Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM): Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential (2018).
Roszkowski, A. Technologie produkcji zwierzęcej a emisje gazów cieplarnianych. Probl. Inżynierii Rol. 19, 83–97 (2011).
Li, Z. et al. Bacterial community composition and fermentation patterns in the rumen of sika deer (Cervus nippon) fed three different diets. Microbiol. Ecol. 69, 307–318 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0497-z
Jami, E., Israel, A., Kotser, A. & Mizrahi, I. Exploring the bovine rumen bacterial community from birth to adulthood. ISME J. 7(6), 1069–1079 (2013).
pubmed: 23426008
pmcid: 3660679
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.2
Khafipour, E., Li, S., Plaizier, J. C. & Krause, D. O. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75(22), 7115–7124 (2009).
pubmed: 19783747
pmcid: 2786511
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00739-09
Tanca, A. et al. Diversity and functions of the sheep faecal microbiota: A multi-omic characterization. Microb. Biotechnol. 10(3), 541–554 (2017).
pubmed: 28165194
pmcid: 5404191
doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12462
O’Hara, E., Neves, A. L., Song, Y. & Guan, L. L. The role of the gut microbiome in cattle production and health: Driver or passenger?. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 8, 199–220 (2020).
pubmed: 32069435
doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083952
Jami, E., White, B. A. & Mizrahi, I. Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency. PLoS ONE 9(1), e85423 (2014).
pubmed: 24465556
pmcid: 3899005
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085423
Li, Z. et al. Bacterial community composition and fermentation patterns in the rumen of sika deer (Cervus nippon) fed three different diets. Microb. Ecol. 69(2), 307–318 (2015).
pubmed: 25252928
doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0497-z
Cholewińska, P., Czyż, K., Nowakowski, P. & Wyrostek, A. The microbiome of the digestive system of ruminants: A review. Animal Health Res. Rev. 1, 1–12 (2020).
Cholewińska, P. et al. Evaluation of changes in the levels of firmicutes and bacteroidetes phyla of sheep feces depending on the breed. Animals 10(10), 1901 (2020).
pmcid: 7603071
doi: 10.3390/ani10101901
McDonald, P. et al. Animal Nutrition 7th edn, 171–187 (Pearson, 2010).
Henderson, G. et al. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci. Rep. 5, 14567 (2015).
pubmed: 26449758
pmcid: 4598811
doi: 10.1038/srep14567
Wang, L. et al. Dynamics and stabilization of the rumen microbiome in yearling Tibetan sheep. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–9 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56206-3
Zeng, Y. et al. Microbial community compositions in the gastrointestinal tract of Chinese Mongolian sheep using Illumina MiSeq sequencing revealed high microbial diversity. AMB Express 7(1), 1–10 (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s13568-017-0378-1
Khafipour, E. et al. Effects of grain feeding on microbiota in the digestive tract of cattle. Anim. Front. 6(2), 13–19 (2016).
doi: 10.2527/af.2016-0018
Jewell, K. A., McCormick, C. A., Odt, C. L., Weimer, P. J. & Suen, G. Ruminal bacterial community composition in dairy cows is dynamic over the course of two lactations and correlates with feed efficiency. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81(14), 4697–4710 (2015).
pubmed: 25934629
pmcid: 4551193
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00720-15
Paster, B. J. et al. Phylogeny of the ammonia-producing ruminal bacteria Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Clostridium sticklandii, and Clostridium aminophilum sp. nov.. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 43(1), 107–110 (1993).
Skopińska-Różewska, E. & Siwicki, K. A. Rola Immunomodulatorów Pochodzenia Naturalnego w Zaobieganiu i Leczeniu Chorób. Wydawnictwo Medyk, 121–128 (2003).
Li, B. et al. Characterization and comparison of microbiota in the gastrointestinal tracts of the goat (Capra hircus) during preweaning development. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2125 (2019).
pubmed: 31572331
pmcid: 6753876
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02125
Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R., Abecia, L. & Newbold, C. J. Manipulating rumen microbiome and fermentation through interventions during early life: A review. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1133 (2015).
pubmed: 26528276
pmcid: 4604304
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01133
Tomaszewski, A., Hibner, A., Zachwieja, A., Tesyna, E. & Chladek, G. Zmiany w zawartości tłuszczu i białka w mleku krów wysokowydajnych. Med. Weter. 63(7), 350–853 (2007).
Misztal, Z. et al. Mikrobiota a zdrowie noworodka. Med. XXI Wieku 48, 1–10 (2019).
Addis, M. F. et al. The bovine milk microbiota: Insights and perspectives from-omics studies. Mol. BioSyst. 12(8), 2359–2372 (2016).
pubmed: 27216801
doi: 10.1039/C6MB00217J
Rey, M. et al. Establishment of ruminal bacterial community in dairy calves from birth to weaning is sequential. J. Appl. Microbiol. 116(2), 245–257 (2014).
pubmed: 24279326
doi: 10.1111/jam.12405
Lv, X. et al. Ruminal microbiota and fermentation in response to dietary protein and energy levels in weaned lambs. Animals 10(1), 109 (2020).
pmcid: 7022951
doi: 10.3390/ani10010109
Malmuthuge, N. Understanding host-microbial interactions in rumen: searching the best opportunity for microbiota manipulation. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 8(1), 8 (2017).
pubmed: 28116074
pmcid: 5244612
doi: 10.1186/s40104-016-0135-3
De Menezes, A. B. et al. Microbiome analysis of dairy cows fed pasture or total mixed ration diets. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 78(2), 256–265 (2011).
pubmed: 21671962
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01151.x
Fernando, S. C. et al. Rumen microbial population dynamics during adaptation to a high-grain diet. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76(22), 7482–7490 (2010).
pubmed: 20851965
pmcid: 2976194
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00388-10
Deng, L., He, C., Zhou, Y., Xu, L. & Xiong, H. Ground transport stress affects bacteria in the rumen of beef cattle: A real-time PCR analysis. Anim. Sci. J. 88(5), 790–797 (2017).
pubmed: 27696632
doi: 10.1111/asj.12615
Abecia, L., Martín-García, A. I., Martínez, G., Newbold, C. J. & Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R. Nutritional intervention in early life to manipulate rumen microbial colonization and methane output by kid goats postweaning. J. Anim. Sci. 91(10), 4832–4840 (2013).
pubmed: 23965388
doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-6142
Knecht, D., Cholewińska, P., Jankowska-Mąkosa, A. & Czyż, K. Development of swine’s digestive tract microbiota and its relation to production indices: A review. Animals 10(3), 527 (2020).
pmcid: 7143181
doi: 10.3390/ani10030527
Cholewińska, P., Górniak, W. & Wojnarowski, K. Impact of selected environmental factors on microbiome of the digestive tract of ruminants. BMC Vet. Res. 17(1), 1–10 (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02742-y
Mao, S. Y., Huo, W. J. & Zhu, W. Y. Microbiome–metabolome analysis reveals unhealthy alterations in the composition and metabolism of ruminal microbiota with increasing dietary grain in a goat model. Environ. Microbiol. 18(2), 525–541 (2016).
pubmed: 25471302
doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12724
Kim, M. et al. Investigation of bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle fed different diets. J. Anim. Sci. 92(2), 683–694 (2014).
pubmed: 24352967
doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6841
Douglas, J. L. et al. Microbial diversity in the digestive tract of two different breeds of sheep. J. Appl. Microbiol. 120(5), 1382–1389 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/jam.13060
Segata, N. et al. Composition of the adult digestive tract bacterial microbiome based on seven mouth surfaces, tonsils, throat and stool samples. Genome Biol. 13(6), R42 (2012).
pubmed: 22698087
pmcid: 3446314
doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r42
Mamun, M. A. A. et al. The composition and stability of the faecal microbiota of Merino sheep. J. Appl. Microbiol. 128(1), 280–291 (2020).
pubmed: 31563150
doi: 10.1111/jam.14468
Markle, J. G. et al. Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science 339(6123), 1084–1088 (2013).
pubmed: 23328391
doi: 10.1126/science.1233521
Menon, R. et al. Diet complexity and estrogen receptor β status affect the composition of the murine intestinal microbiota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79(18), 5763–5773 (2013).
pubmed: 23872567
pmcid: 3754184
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01182-13
Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. The human microbiome project. Nature 449(7164), 804–810 (2007).
pubmed: 17943116
pmcid: 3709439
doi: 10.1038/nature06244
Lopes, L. D. et al. Exploring the sheep rumen microbiome for carbohydrate-active enzymes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 108(1), 15–30 (2015).
pubmed: 25900454
doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0459-6
Qin, J. et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464(7285), 59–65 (2010).
pubmed: 20203603
pmcid: 3779803
doi: 10.1038/nature08821
Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 457(7228), 480–484 (2009).
pubmed: 19043404
doi: 10.1038/nature07540
Zhang, H. et al. The dynamic distribution of small-tail han sheep microbiota across different intestinal segments. Front. Microbiol. 9, 32 (2018).
pubmed: 29445360
pmcid: 5797768
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00032
Cholewińska, P. et al. Electrical characteristics based on resistance and impedance of Polish Olkuska sheep lambs wool. J. Nat. Fibers 1, 1–12 (2019).
Strzetelski, J. A., Brzóska, F., Kowalski, Z. M. & Osięgłowski, S. Zalecenia Żywieniowe dla Przeżuwaczy i Tabele Wartości Pokarmowej Pasz (Instytut Zootechniki, 2014).
AOAC. Guidelines for Single Laboratory Validation of Chemical Methods for Dietary Supplements and Botanicals (2002).
Thompson, J. M. & Meyer, H. H. Body Condition Scoring of Sheep (Springer, 1994).
Taylor, S. C., Laperriere, G. & Germain, H. Droplet digital PCR versus qPCR for gene expression analysis with low abundant targets: From variable nonsense to publication quality data. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 2409 (2017).
pubmed: 28546538
pmcid: 5445070
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02217-x
Dowd, S. E. et al. Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). BMC Microbiol. 8(1), 1–8 (2008).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-125
De Gregoris, T. B., Aldred, N., Clare, A. S. & Burgess, J. G. Improvement of phylum-and classspecific primers for real-time PCR quantification of bacterial taxa. J. Microbiol. Methods 86(3), 351–356 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.06.010
Walter, J. et al. Detection of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, and Weissella species in human feces by using group-specific PCR primers and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67(6), 2578–2585 (2001).
pubmed: 11375166
pmcid: 92910
doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2578-2585.2001
CFX Maestro, Bio-Rad, Inc, California.
Statistica ver. 13.1., TIBCO, Statsoft Polska (Dell Software).