Are sex differences in the outcome of peritoneal dialysis explained by nurse assistance? A cohort study with data from the Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française.
mediation analysis
peritoneal dialysis
sex difference
Journal
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
ISSN: 1460-2385
Titre abrégé: Nephrol Dial Transplant
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8706402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 07 2022
26 07 2022
Historique:
received:
28
06
2021
pubmed:
12
12
2021
medline:
29
7
2022
entrez:
11
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to evaluate sex differences in peritoneal dialysis (PD) outcomes and to explore direct and indirect effects of nurse-assisted PD on outcomes. This was a retrospective study using data from the Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française of incident PD patients between 2005 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to analyse transfer to haemodialysis (HD), death, PD failure, peritonitis and renal transplantation. Mediation analyses with a counterfactual approach were carried out to evaluate natural direct and indirect effects of sex on transfer to HD and peritonitis, with nurse-assisted PD as a mediator a priori. Of the 14 659 patients included, there were 5970 females (41%) and 8689 males (59%). Women were more frequently treated by nurse-assisted PD than men [2926/5970 (49.1%) versus 3357/8689 (38.7%)]. In the multivariable analysis, women had a lower risk of transfer to HD [cause-specific hazard ratio {cs-HR} 0.82 {95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.88}], death [cs-HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95)], peritonitis [cs-HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.87)], PD failure [cs-HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.90)] and a lower chance of undergoing transplant [cs-HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.90)] than men. There was a direct effect of sex on the risk of transfer to HD [cs-HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.82-0.83)], with an indirect effect of nurse-assisted PD [cs-HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.99)]. Nurse-assisted PD had no indirect effect on the risk of peritonitis. Our results suggest that compared with men, women have a lower risk of both transfer to HD and peritonitis. Mediation analysis showed that nurse assistance was a potential mediator in the causal pathway between sex and transfer to HD.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
We aimed to evaluate sex differences in peritoneal dialysis (PD) outcomes and to explore direct and indirect effects of nurse-assisted PD on outcomes.
METHODS
This was a retrospective study using data from the Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française of incident PD patients between 2005 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to analyse transfer to haemodialysis (HD), death, PD failure, peritonitis and renal transplantation. Mediation analyses with a counterfactual approach were carried out to evaluate natural direct and indirect effects of sex on transfer to HD and peritonitis, with nurse-assisted PD as a mediator a priori.
RESULTS
Of the 14 659 patients included, there were 5970 females (41%) and 8689 males (59%). Women were more frequently treated by nurse-assisted PD than men [2926/5970 (49.1%) versus 3357/8689 (38.7%)]. In the multivariable analysis, women had a lower risk of transfer to HD [cause-specific hazard ratio {cs-HR} 0.82 {95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.88}], death [cs-HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95)], peritonitis [cs-HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.87)], PD failure [cs-HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.90)] and a lower chance of undergoing transplant [cs-HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.90)] than men. There was a direct effect of sex on the risk of transfer to HD [cs-HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.82-0.83)], with an indirect effect of nurse-assisted PD [cs-HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.99)]. Nurse-assisted PD had no indirect effect on the risk of peritonitis.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that compared with men, women have a lower risk of both transfer to HD and peritonitis. Mediation analysis showed that nurse assistance was a potential mediator in the causal pathway between sex and transfer to HD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34893901
pii: 6459211
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab354
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1520-1528Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared. The authors declare that the results presented in this article have not been published previously in whole or part except in abstract format.