The Anti-Circumsporozoite Antibody Response of Children to Seasonal Vaccination With the RTS,S/AS01E Malaria Vaccine.
Burkina Faso
Mali
RTS
S/AS01E vaccine
anti-circumsporozoite antibody
seasonal vaccination
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 09 2022
10 09 2022
Historique:
received:
18
06
2021
pubmed:
12
12
2021
medline:
14
9
2022
entrez:
11
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A trial in African children showed that combining seasonal vaccination with the RTS,S/AS01E vaccine with seasonal malaria chemoprevention reduced the incidence of uncomplicated and severe malaria compared with either intervention given alone. Here, we report on the anti-circumsporozoite antibody response to seasonal RTS,S/AS01E vaccination in children in this trial. Sera from a randomly selected subset of children collected before and 1 month after 3 priming doses of RTS,S/AS01E and before and 1 month after 2 seasonal booster doses were tested for anti-circumsporozoite antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The association between post-vaccination antibody titer and incidence of malaria was explored. A strong anti-circumsporozoite antibody response to 3 priming doses of RTS,S/AS01E was seen (geometric mean titer, 368.9 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units/mL), but titers fell prior to the first booster dose. A strong antibody response to an annual, pre-malaria transmission season booster dose was observed, but this was lower than after the primary vaccination series and lower after the second than after the first booster dose (ratio of geometric mean rise, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], .57-.77). Children whose antibody response was in the upper tercile post-vaccination had a lower incidence of malaria during the following year than children in the lowest tercile (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, .28-.66). Seasonal vaccination with RTS,S/AS01E induced a strong booster antibody response that was lower after the second than after the first booster dose. The diminished antibody response to the second booster dose was not associated with diminished efficacy. NCT03143218.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A trial in African children showed that combining seasonal vaccination with the RTS,S/AS01E vaccine with seasonal malaria chemoprevention reduced the incidence of uncomplicated and severe malaria compared with either intervention given alone. Here, we report on the anti-circumsporozoite antibody response to seasonal RTS,S/AS01E vaccination in children in this trial.
METHODS
Sera from a randomly selected subset of children collected before and 1 month after 3 priming doses of RTS,S/AS01E and before and 1 month after 2 seasonal booster doses were tested for anti-circumsporozoite antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The association between post-vaccination antibody titer and incidence of malaria was explored.
RESULTS
A strong anti-circumsporozoite antibody response to 3 priming doses of RTS,S/AS01E was seen (geometric mean titer, 368.9 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units/mL), but titers fell prior to the first booster dose. A strong antibody response to an annual, pre-malaria transmission season booster dose was observed, but this was lower than after the primary vaccination series and lower after the second than after the first booster dose (ratio of geometric mean rise, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], .57-.77). Children whose antibody response was in the upper tercile post-vaccination had a lower incidence of malaria during the following year than children in the lowest tercile (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, .28-.66).
CONCLUSIONS
Seasonal vaccination with RTS,S/AS01E induced a strong booster antibody response that was lower after the second than after the first booster dose. The diminished antibody response to the second booster dose was not associated with diminished efficacy.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
NCT03143218.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34894221
pii: 6459764
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab1017
pmc: PMC9464075
doi:
Substances chimiques
Malaria Vaccines
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03143218']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
613-622Subventions
Organisme : PATH MVI
ID : 18269
Organisme : Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society
ID : 220658/Z/20/Z
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P006876/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R010161/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Potential conflicts of interest. O. O.-A. is an employee of the GSK group of companies and has restricted shares in the GSK group of companies. A. D. reports a research grant from Grand Challenges Canada to test safety and efficacy of the PfSPZ vaccine for pregnant women and unborn children and a research contract with Oxford University to conduct a phase 3 randomized, controlled multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy of the R21/Matrix-M vaccine in African children against clinical malaria outside of the submitted work. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Références
J Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;214(5):762-71
pubmed: 27296848
BMC Med. 2019 Aug 14;17(1):157
pubmed: 31409398
BMC Med. 2014 Jul 10;12:117
pubmed: 25012228
Malar J. 2017 May 2;16(1):182
pubmed: 28464937
J Immunol. 2018 Aug 15;201(4):1315-1326
pubmed: 30006374
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 15;9(12):e115126
pubmed: 25506706
Trop Med Int Health. 2007 Jan;12(1):37-46
pubmed: 17207146
PLoS One. 2009 Oct 02;4(10):e7302
pubmed: 19806184
PLoS Med. 2014 Jul 29;11(7):e1001685
pubmed: 25072396
Malar J. 2011 Aug 04;10:223
pubmed: 21816032
J Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 15;210(10):1523-5
pubmed: 24823622
Malar J. 2012 Nov 22;11:384
pubmed: 23173602
Nat Commun. 2019 May 15;10(1):2174
pubmed: 31092823
Vaccine. 2007 May 10;25(19):3816-26
pubmed: 17368878
NPJ Vaccines. 2020 Jun 4;5:46
pubmed: 32550014
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Dec;15(12):1450-8
pubmed: 26342424
Front Immunol. 2017 Aug 23;8:1008
pubmed: 28878775
Clin Exp Immunol. 2004 Feb;135(2):286-93
pubmed: 14738458
J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 13;222(10):1681-1691
pubmed: 32687161
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Jul 22;12(553):
pubmed: 32718991
Infect Immun. 2009 Oct;77(10):4502-9
pubmed: 19651872
J Immunol. 2003 Dec 15;171(12):6961-7
pubmed: 14662904
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25786
pubmed: 21998698
Malar J. 2016 May 31;15:301
pubmed: 27245446
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52870
pubmed: 23300801
J Infect Dis. 1999 Nov;180(5):1656-64
pubmed: 10515829
Front Big Data. 2021 Jun 15;4:672460
pubmed: 34212134
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 15;10(9):e035433
pubmed: 32933955
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 9;385(11):1005-1017
pubmed: 34432975
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 06;380(23):2197-2206
pubmed: 30699301
NPJ Vaccines. 2021 Aug 30;6(1):110
pubmed: 34462438
J Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 13;224(7):1128-1138
pubmed: 32236404
Vaccine. 2020 Nov 3;38(47):7498-7507
pubmed: 33041104
Lancet. 2001 Dec 8;358(9297):1927-34
pubmed: 11747915
Elife. 2020 Apr 29;9:
pubmed: 32342859
Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):31-45
pubmed: 25913272
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Feb 28;114(9):2425-2430
pubmed: 28193898
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 16;8(4):e61395
pubmed: 23613845