Success and complication rate of miniscrew assisted non-surgical palatal expansion in adults - a consecutive study using a novel force-controlled polycyclic activation protocol.
Adult patients
Bone-borne
Complication
MAPE
MARPE
Maxillary expansion
Miniscrew
Non-surgical
Success
Journal
Head & face medicine
ISSN: 1746-160X
Titre abrégé: Head Face Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245792
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Dec 2021
11 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
04
06
2021
accepted:
13
11
2021
entrez:
13
12
2021
pubmed:
14
12
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Bone-borne miniscrew assisted palatal expansion (MAPE) is a common technique to improve maxillary transverse deficiency in young adolescents. Adult patients usually present a challenge, as they often require additional surgical assisted maxillary expansion (SARPE). There is still no clear statement about non-surgical expansion in adult patients using this technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success and complication rate of non-surgical palatal expansion in adults utilizing MAPE with a novel force-controlled polycyclic expansion protocol (FCPC). This consecutive study consisted of 33 adult patients with an average age of 29.1 ± 10.2 years (min. 18 years, max. 58 years), including one dropout patient. First, four miniscrews were inserted and after 12-weeks latency, the expander was placed and the FCPC protocol was applied (MAPE group). In case of missing expansion, a SARPE was performed (SARPE group). After maximum expansion, a cone beam CT was made and widening of the midpalatal suture was measured. The outcome variables were successful non-surgical expansion and, with sample size power above 80%, the odds of failed non-surgical expansion and associated complications were evaluated. The primary predictor variable was age. Statistical analysis was performed using R (Version 3.1) to calculate power, to construct various models for measuring the odds of requiring surgical intervention/complications, and others. Successful non-surgical expansion was achieved in 27 patients (84.4%), ranging from 18 to 49 years. Mean age differed significantly between both groups (26.8 ± 8.2 years vs. 41.3 ± 9.9 years; p < 0.001). Mean expansion at the anterior and posterior palate for the MAPE group was 5.4 ± 1.5 mm and 2.5 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. Among these subjects' complications were observed in 18.5%. Age significantly increased the odds of complications (p = 0.019). 1. The success rate of MAPE among individuals aged 18 to 49 years was 84.4%. 2. A V-shaped expansion pattern in the antero-posterior dimension was mostly observed. 3. Complications were significantly associated with age. 4. A careful expansion protocol seems to be beneficial to prevent unfavorable results in adult patients. Consecutive cohort study, Review Board No. EK-2-2014/0016.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34895287
doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00301-2
pii: 10.1186/s13005-021-00301-2
pmc: PMC8665552
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
50Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):711-4
pubmed: 15529509
J Clin Orthod. 2013 Jun;47(6):375-81; quiz 388
pubmed: 23863561
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Feb;22(1):110-125
pubmed: 28444019
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jun;137(6):830-9
pubmed: 20685540
J Craniofac Surg. 2000 Sep;11(5):491-4
pubmed: 11314070
Angle Orthod. 2021 Mar 1;91(2):187-194
pubmed: 33351888
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Oct;70(10):2394-402
pubmed: 22516838
Angle Orthod. 2015 Mar;85(2):253-62
pubmed: 25490552
Prog Orthod. 2017 Nov 1;18(1):34
pubmed: 29090368
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Aug;37(4):268-72
pubmed: 10475647
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 May;149(5):716-28
pubmed: 27131254
Prog Orthod. 2014 Aug 29;15:52
pubmed: 25242527
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):759-69
pubmed: 24182592
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Feb;39(1):76-84
pubmed: 27036133
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Jun;153(6):818-824
pubmed: 29853239
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jan;151(1):3-4
pubmed: 28024780
Angle Orthod. 2006 Jul;76(4):543-50
pubmed: 16808557
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;38(4):308-15
pubmed: 19278832
Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep;86(5):713-20
pubmed: 26938955
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;79(1):213-224
pubmed: 32422194
J Dent Res. 2002 Dec;81(12):810-6
pubmed: 12454093
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;69(3):899-905
pubmed: 21236540
Biology (Basel). 2021 Mar 03;10(3):
pubmed: 33802266
Eur J Orthod. 1998 Jun;20(3):255-61
pubmed: 9699403
Angle Orthod. 2019 Sep;89(5):713-720
pubmed: 30896250
Korean J Orthod. 2017 Mar;47(2):77-86
pubmed: 28337417
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 May;143(5):633-44
pubmed: 23631965
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Mar;42(2):121-7
pubmed: 15748102
Bone. 2006 May;38(5):722-30
pubmed: 16413234
Am J Orthod. 1981 Jun;79(6):630-52
pubmed: 7015868
Korean J Orthod. 2019 Nov;49(6):360-371
pubmed: 31815104
Angle Orthod. 2018 Sep;88(5):649-664
pubmed: 29714067
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Oct;36(5):541-9
pubmed: 23221896
Angle Orthod. 2020 May 1;90(3):432-441
pubmed: 33378437