The economic impact of schistosomiasis.
Agriculture
Neglected Tropical Diseases
Poverty
Schistosomiasis
Sub-Saharan Africa
Water Resources Development
Journal
Infectious diseases of poverty
ISSN: 2049-9957
Titre abrégé: Infect Dis Poverty
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101606645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Dec 2021
13 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
18
08
2021
accepted:
04
11
2021
entrez:
13
12
2021
pubmed:
14
12
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The economic impact of schistosomiasis and the underlying tradeoffs between water resources development and public health concerns have yet to be quantified. Schistosomiasis exerts large health, social and financial burdens on infected individuals and households. While irrigation schemes are one of the most important policy responses designed to reduce poverty, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, they facilitate the propagation of schistosomiasis and other diseases. We estimate the economic impact of schistosomiasis in Burkina Faso via its effect on agricultural production. We create an original dataset that combines detailed household and agricultural surveys with high-resolution geo-statistical disease maps. We develop new methods that use the densities of the intermediate host snails of schistosomiasis as instrumental variables together with panel, spatial and machine learning techniques. We estimate that the elimination of schistosomiasis in Burkina Faso would increase average crop yields by around 7%, rising to 32% for high infection clusters. Keeping schistosomiasis unchecked, in turn, would correspond to a loss of gross domestic product of approximately 0.8%. We identify the disease burden as a shock to the agricultural productivity of farmers. The poorest households engaged in subsistence agriculture bear a far heavier disease burden than their wealthier counterparts, experiencing an average yield loss due to schistosomiasis of between 32 and 45%. We show that the returns to water resources development are substantially reduced once its health effects are taken into account: villages in proximity of large-scale dams suffer an average yield loss of around 20%, and this burden decreases as distance between dams and villages increases. This study provides a rigorous estimation of how schistosomiasis affects agricultural production and how it is both a driver and a consequence of poverty. It further quantifies the tradeoff between the economics of water infrastructures and their impact on public health. Although we focus on Burkina Faso, our approach can be applied to any country in which schistosomiasis is endemic.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The economic impact of schistosomiasis and the underlying tradeoffs between water resources development and public health concerns have yet to be quantified. Schistosomiasis exerts large health, social and financial burdens on infected individuals and households. While irrigation schemes are one of the most important policy responses designed to reduce poverty, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, they facilitate the propagation of schistosomiasis and other diseases.
METHODS
METHODS
We estimate the economic impact of schistosomiasis in Burkina Faso via its effect on agricultural production. We create an original dataset that combines detailed household and agricultural surveys with high-resolution geo-statistical disease maps. We develop new methods that use the densities of the intermediate host snails of schistosomiasis as instrumental variables together with panel, spatial and machine learning techniques.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We estimate that the elimination of schistosomiasis in Burkina Faso would increase average crop yields by around 7%, rising to 32% for high infection clusters. Keeping schistosomiasis unchecked, in turn, would correspond to a loss of gross domestic product of approximately 0.8%. We identify the disease burden as a shock to the agricultural productivity of farmers. The poorest households engaged in subsistence agriculture bear a far heavier disease burden than their wealthier counterparts, experiencing an average yield loss due to schistosomiasis of between 32 and 45%. We show that the returns to water resources development are substantially reduced once its health effects are taken into account: villages in proximity of large-scale dams suffer an average yield loss of around 20%, and this burden decreases as distance between dams and villages increases.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides a rigorous estimation of how schistosomiasis affects agricultural production and how it is both a driver and a consequence of poverty. It further quantifies the tradeoff between the economics of water infrastructures and their impact on public health. Although we focus on Burkina Faso, our approach can be applied to any country in which schistosomiasis is endemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34895355
doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00919-z
pii: 10.1186/s40249-021-00919-z
pmc: PMC8667389
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
134Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Rev Econ Stat. 2009 Jan 28;91(1):52-65
pubmed: 24163482
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858
pubmed: 30496104
Lancet. 2014 Jun 28;383(9936):2253-64
pubmed: 24698483
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Oct;7(10):e1414-e1422
pubmed: 31537371
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Jan 1;94(1):37-45
pubmed: 26769995
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jan 12;12(1):e0005524
pubmed: 29329293
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Jul;5(7):e688-e698
pubmed: 28619227
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2004 Feb;97(1):47-52
pubmed: 15104159
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Aug;15(8):927-40
pubmed: 26004859
Chronic Illn. 2008 Mar;4(1):65-79
pubmed: 18322031
Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 Jul;6(7):411-25
pubmed: 16790382
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Nov 20;9(11):e0004217
pubmed: 26587839
Lancet. 2018 Jan 27;391(10118):307-308
pubmed: 29413041
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Sep;16(9):1065-1075
pubmed: 27286968
Trop Med Int Health. 2003 May;8(5):471-83
pubmed: 12753643
Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 May 4;6(1):93
pubmed: 28468667
J R Soc Interface. 2009 Jun 6;6(35):495-508
pubmed: 18782722
Acta Trop. 2010 Feb;113(2):95-104
pubmed: 19962954
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Dec;5(12):e1396
pubmed: 22163056
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1118-e1129
pubmed: 31255591
Trends Parasitol. 2006 Jul;22(7):322-6
pubmed: 16690357
Acta Trop. 2003 May;86(2-3):161-83
pubmed: 12745135
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jun 7;113(23):6427-32
pubmed: 27162339