Bothersome Hematospermia Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

5-alpha reductase inhibitors CyberKnife SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) hematospermia prostate cancer

Journal

Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 26 08 2021
accepted: 05 10 2021
entrez: 13 12 2021
pubmed: 14 12 2021
medline: 14 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hematospermia following prostate radiation therapy is a benign and often self-limiting side effect. However, it may be bothersome to some men and their partners with a negative impact on sexual quality of life (QOL). This study sought to evaluate the incidence, duration, and resolution of hematospermia in patients following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer. 227 patients treated with SBRT from 2013 to 2019 at Georgetown University Hospital for localized prostate carcinoma with a minimum follow up of two years were included in this retrospective review of data that was prospectively collected. Patients who were greater than 70 years old and/or received hormonal therapy were excluded. Hematospermia was defined as bright red blood in the ejaculate. Time points for data collection included initial consultation, pre-treatment, 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, 18-, 24-month. All patients were treated with the CyberKnife Radiosurgical System (Accuray). Data on hematospermia including duration, resolution and recurrence was collected. Utilization of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors was documented at each visit. 227 patients (45 low-, 177 intermediate-, and 5 high-risk according to the D'Amico classification) at a median age of 65 years (range 47-70) received SBRT for their localized prostate cancer. The 2-year cumulative incidence of hematospermia was 5.6%(14 patients). For these patients, all but one patient (93%) saw resolution of their hematospermia by two years post-SBRT. The median time for hematospermia was 9 months post-treatment. Of the 14 patients who reported hematospermia, 70% were managed with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. Hematospermia was transient in most patients with 70% of the men reporting resolution by the next follow-up visit. The incidence of bothersome hematospermia following SBRT was low. Hematospermia, as noted by other studies, often self-resolves. 5-alpha reductase inhibitors may lead to quicker resolution of bothersome hematospermia.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Hematospermia following prostate radiation therapy is a benign and often self-limiting side effect. However, it may be bothersome to some men and their partners with a negative impact on sexual quality of life (QOL). This study sought to evaluate the incidence, duration, and resolution of hematospermia in patients following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer.
METHODS METHODS
227 patients treated with SBRT from 2013 to 2019 at Georgetown University Hospital for localized prostate carcinoma with a minimum follow up of two years were included in this retrospective review of data that was prospectively collected. Patients who were greater than 70 years old and/or received hormonal therapy were excluded. Hematospermia was defined as bright red blood in the ejaculate. Time points for data collection included initial consultation, pre-treatment, 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, 18-, 24-month. All patients were treated with the CyberKnife Radiosurgical System (Accuray). Data on hematospermia including duration, resolution and recurrence was collected. Utilization of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors was documented at each visit.
RESULTS RESULTS
227 patients (45 low-, 177 intermediate-, and 5 high-risk according to the D'Amico classification) at a median age of 65 years (range 47-70) received SBRT for their localized prostate cancer. The 2-year cumulative incidence of hematospermia was 5.6%(14 patients). For these patients, all but one patient (93%) saw resolution of their hematospermia by two years post-SBRT. The median time for hematospermia was 9 months post-treatment. Of the 14 patients who reported hematospermia, 70% were managed with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. Hematospermia was transient in most patients with 70% of the men reporting resolution by the next follow-up visit.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of bothersome hematospermia following SBRT was low. Hematospermia, as noted by other studies, often self-resolves. 5-alpha reductase inhibitors may lead to quicker resolution of bothersome hematospermia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34900713
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.765171
pmc: PMC8654776
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

765171

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Shah, Sholklapper, Creswell, Pepin, Cantalino, Hankins, Suy and Collins.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

SC serves as clinical consultants to Accuray Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Urology. 2005 Aug;66(2):377-81
pubmed: 16098365
Urology. 2001 Apr;57(4):763-8
pubmed: 11306400
J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1291-4
pubmed: 14501744
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Oct;6(5):959-972
pubmed: 29184797
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Apr;44(2):371-5
pubmed: 21956168
Acta Radiol. 2001 Jan;42(1):70-3
pubmed: 11167335
Urology. 1999 Sep;54(3):503-8
pubmed: 10475362
Andrology. 2017 Jul;5(4):671-678
pubmed: 28453908
Urology. 1995 Oct;46(4):463-7
pubmed: 7571212
Front Oncol. 2014 May 26;4:122
pubmed: 24904833
J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2189-92
pubmed: 15538229
Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):876-92
pubmed: 23787356
Radiology. 1995 May;195(2):385-90
pubmed: 7724756
J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2296-302
pubmed: 19758610
Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):190-6
pubmed: 12559294
Transl Androl Urol. 2016 Aug;5(4):592-601
pubmed: 27652230
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Mar 13;8:58
pubmed: 23497695
J Sex Med. 2013 May;10(5):1410-6
pubmed: 23433425
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jan;25(1):4-10
pubmed: 25481260
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 May;195(5):393-401
pubmed: 30406289
Acta Oncol. 2016;55(1):52-8
pubmed: 25972264
Int J Cancer. 2001 Oct 20;96(5):313-9
pubmed: 11582584
Radiother Oncol. 2010 Jul;96(1):38-42
pubmed: 20334942

Auteurs

Sarthak Shah (S)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.

Tamir Sholklapper (T)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.

Michael Creswell (M)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.

Abigail Pepin (A)

Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Jonathan Cantalino (J)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.

Ryan Andrew Hankins (RA)

Department of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.

Simeng Suy (S)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.

Sean P Collins (SP)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.

Classifications MeSH