A GPU-accelerated framework for individualized estimation of organ doses in digital tomosynthesis.


Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
revised: 16 11 2021
received: 24 07 2021
accepted: 24 11 2021
pubmed: 14 12 2021
medline: 12 2 2022
entrez: 13 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Estimation of organ doses in digital tomosynthesis (DT) is challenging due to the lack of existing tools that accurately and flexibly model protocol- and view-specific collimations and motion trajectories of the source and detector for a variety of exam protocols, and the computational inefficiencies of conducting MC simulations. The purpose of this study was to overcome these limitations by developing and benchmarking a GPU-accelerated MC simulation framework compatible with patient-specific computational phantoms for individualized estimation of organ doses in DT. The framework for individualized estimation of dose in DT was developed as a two-step workflow: (1) a custom MATLAB code that accepts a patient-specific computational phantom and exam description (organ markers for defining the extremities of the anatomical region of interest, tube voltage, source-to-image distance, angular sweep range, number of projection views, and the pivot point to image distance - PPID) to compute the field of views (FOVs) for a clinical DT system, and (2) a MC tool (developed using MC-GPU) modeling the configuration of a clinical DT system to estimate organ doses based on the computed FOVs. Using this framework, we estimated organ doses for 28 radiosensitive organs in an adult reference patient model (M; 30 years) imaged using a commercial DT system (VolumeRad, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). The estimates were benchmarked against values from a comparable organ dose estimation framework (reference dataset developed by the Advanced Laboratory for Radiation Dosimetry Studies at University of Florida) for a posterior-anterior chest exam. The resulting differences were quantified as percent relative errors and analyzed to identify any potential sources of bias and uncertainties. The timing performance (run duration in seconds) of the framework was also quantified for the same simulation to gauge the feasibility of the workflow for time-constrained clinical applications. The organ dose estimates from the developed framework showed a close agreement with the reference dataset, with percent relative errors ranging from -6.9% to 5.0% and a mean absolute percent difference of 1.7% over all radiosensitive organs, with the exception of testes and eye lens, for which the percent relative errors were higher at -18.9% and -27.6%, respectively, due to their relative positioning outside the primary irradiation field, leading to fewer photons depositing energy and consequently higher errors in estimated organ doses. The run duration for the same simulation was 916.3 s, representing a substantial improvement in performance over existing nonparallelized MC tools. This study successfully developed and benchmarked a GPU-accelerated framework compatible with patient-specific anthropomorphic computational phantoms for accurate individualized estimation of organ doses in DT. By enabling patient-specific estimation of organ doses, this framework can aid clinicians and researchers by providing them with tools essential for tracking the radiation burden to patients for dose monitoring purposes and identifying the trends and relationships in organ doses for a patient population to optimize existing and develop new exam protocols.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34902159
doi: 10.1002/mp.15400
pmc: PMC8828666
mid: NIHMS1763745
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

891-900

Subventions

Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : P41 EB028744
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB001838
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01EB001838
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P41EB028744
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Med Phys. 2019 Nov;46(11):4826-4836
pubmed: 31410861
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):890-6
pubmed: 20308487
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Aug;25(8):3061-3072
pubmed: 33651703
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Sep 21;59(18):5225-42
pubmed: 25144322
Med Phys. 2000 May;27(5):828-37
pubmed: 10841384
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):244-51
pubmed: 19616909
Med Phys. 2014 Feb;41(2):023901
pubmed: 24506654
Eur Radiol. 2008 Apr;18(4):759-72
pubmed: 18066555
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011792
pubmed: 32721031
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Apr 21;56(8):2347-65
pubmed: 21427484
Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):3788-800
pubmed: 26133581
Health Phys. 2021 Jul 1;121(1):18-29
pubmed: 33867436
Med Phys. 2014 Apr;41(4):042101
pubmed: 24694149
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jul;4(3):031207
pubmed: 28804729
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Nov 04;64(21):215020
pubmed: 31539892
Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):4878-80
pubmed: 19994495
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2007;127(1-4):12-8
pubmed: 18003712
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Mar;216(3):824-834
pubmed: 33474986
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jun;11(6):594-9
pubmed: 24713501
Radiographics. 2016 May-Jun;36(3):735-50
pubmed: 27163590
Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5480-7
pubmed: 20095260
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Nov 7;51(21):5391-407
pubmed: 17047259
Med Phys. 2010 Sep;37(9):4902-15
pubmed: 20964209
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Apr 21;56(8):2309-46
pubmed: 21427487

Auteurs

Shobhit Sharma (S)

Center for Virtual Imaging Trials and Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Anuj Kapadia (A)

Center for Virtual Imaging Trials and Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Justin Brown (J)

Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

William Paul Segars (WP)

Center for Virtual Imaging Trials and Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Wesley Bolch (W)

Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Ehsan Samei (E)

Center for Virtual Imaging Trials and Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH